interviews with the first participants were done on April 13, 2016, April 20, 2016, May 11, 2016, and June 6, 2016. While, the interview with the second participants
were done on April 11, 2016, April 18, 2016, May 23, 2016, and June 17, 2016. By having interview as the data collection technique, useful information that
could not be directly observed could be gained. Besides, the interviewer also had better control over the types of information received, because the interviewer
could ask specific questions to elicit this information Ary, et al, 2010. Both participants would be interviewed to clarify things and ask for clearer explanation
for what had happen during the TSs interaction in class. As the last technique, the teachers were interviewed again to cross- check the result of data analysis.
3.6 Data Analysis
In this research, the process of analyzing data was adopted from Creswell 2012. It consists of collecting data, preparing data for analysis, reading through
data, coding the data, and coding the text for themes and description to be used in the research report. After the observation notes and interview transcript have been
ready to a, the process of reading, coding, and describing will be done. Table 3.1 Procedures of Data Analysis
Process Results
collecting data observation
notes, audio files of observation and interview
preparing data for analysis observation
notes, transcripts
of classroom observation and interview
reading through data notes of important understanding
coding data coded data
coding the text for description to be used in the research report
description coding the text for themes to be used
in the research report themes
3.7 Trustworthiness
To keep the trustworthiness for this research, the data and the analysis should be trustworthy. The instruments as well as the finding should be valid and
reliable. In this research, the trustworthiness of the data was achieved by doing cross- checking. It is done by having multiple data instrumentation namely direct
observation and interview. According to Ary et al. 2010, if multiple data sources result in similar findings, the reliability of the research is improved. The data was
compared whether they supported each other. What was found during the observation was discussed and investigated further during the interview. This was
why the interviews were done right after the observation. It aimed to know the teachers’ consideration affecting their actions during TSs interaction at that time.
Besides aiming to achieve the trustworthiness of data, the interviews were also done to confirm the results of the analysis. After having enough data, the
analysis was presented and discussed with the teacher on the interview. As a result, the discussions in the chapter 4 were presented with the teachers’
confirmation. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
