Abbreviation Pronoun Formality Errors

47 would thus discuss each category to reveal the errors thoroughly. The following were some of the students’ diction containing errors requiring analysis.

1. Formality Errors

Table 4.6 shows that 86 errors covered four features, namely abbreviation, pronoun, expression, and subjective words. Table 4.6 The Percentage of Formality Errors No. Error Type Total 1. Abbreviation 20 7.49 2. Pronoun 37 13.86 3. Expression 18 6.74 4. Subjective words 11 4.12 TOTAL 86 32.21 The writer thus sequentially elaborated some examples of formality errors in the following sections:

a. Abbreviation

There were 20 errors 7.49 of abbreviation in students’ composition. These errors covered wrong use of initialism and contraction. Examples of initialism error were: 1 Even though in the GBPP states that elementary school students … 2 People still consider that human intelligence can be measured only by IQ test. The above sentences included incorrect initialisms as the students placed the initialism without elucidating the meaning. It was probably inappropriate as some of the readers might be unaware what those initialisms stood for. Plausible rectifications of these sentences were: 48 1 Even though in the GBPP Garis-garis Besar Pedoman Pengajaran states that elementary school students … 2 People still consider that human intelligence can be measured only by IQ Intelligence Quotient test. Meanwhile, examples of contraction found in the students’ composition were: 1 If it doesn’t work, give him a punishment. 2 In sum, experiential learning method in writing process helps the students to reach high level thinking. The italic words were the contractions. Contractions are avoided since they are informal English Harder et al, 1965: 17; Wresch et al, 1988: 186. These sentences were informal sentences since they expressed the spoken form rather than the written form. ‘Doesn’t’ and ‘in sum’ were appropriate in speaking but inappropriate in writing. In this case the students should write the whole words. Plausible rectifications of the sentences were: 1 If it does not work, give him a punishment. 2 In summary, experiential learning method in writing process helps the students to reach high level thinking.

b. Pronoun

Writers must avoid a masculine bias in pronouns or other words that indicate gender as sexist pronouns are not allowed in academic writing 49 Memering, 1989: 249. From 37 errors, most of the errors appeared in employing sexist pronoun. For example: 1 … integrated into the individual’s system of constructs which he imposes on the world. 2 the learner can utilize his experiences and learning strengths in the process of constructing knowledge. The use of he and his above implies a totally masculine group. In other words, the students overlook the feminine group. As this is unacceptable in academic writing, the students should use a pronoun that explicitly indicates both men and women. Plausible rectifications of the sentences were: 1 … integrated into the individual’s system of constructs which he or she imposes on the world. 2 … the learner can utilize his or her experiences and learning strengths in the process of constructing knowledge. Addressing you was mostly considered as informal in academic writing as well. The detailed data enclosed in Appendix 5 specifically showed that 16 errors found in this sub-category. For example: 1 Studying public speaking is important to you not only personally but also professionally. 2 You can not edit and revise what you wish to say. 50

c. Expression

Dokumen yang terkait

The English sound changes among Javanese students of the English language education study program of Sanata Dharma University.

0 1 154

Students` perception on the use of blog in basic writing class in English Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University.

0 0 110

The mastery of English phrasal verbs among the sixth semester students of the English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University.

0 0 158

Students` perception of the use of internet in writing VI course in english language education study program of Sanata Dharma University.

0 0 85

The acquisition of noun premodification in the writing of the first semester students of the English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University.

0 1 121

Pronunciation accuracy in vowel production of the students of the English Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University the minimum competence.

0 1 133

Finite-verb errors in the students` writing D assignments of the English language education study programme of Sanata Dharma University.

0 1 129

The mastery of English phrasal verbs among the sixth semester students of the English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University

0 1 155

Diction in academic writing of the sixth semeter students of the english education study program of Sanata Dharma University - USD Repository

0 0 126

Learning strategies in writing used by writing III students of the english language education study program of Sanata Dharma University - USD Repository

0 0 127