Attitude and Engagement Analysis Table 4.2.1 Attitudes and Engagement Analysis 50 Graduation Analysis Table 4.2.2 Graduation Analysis

commit to user 78 one of the artist and does not find the rival to drop her. Even though there are some negative evaluations, they are only about the bad character of the artist hunger or hungry but still support the artist. Third, he also finds other references heterogloss which also similar with his, in this case he takes from Keith and Mary Hudson which also give support to Katy Perry. Hence, the ideology of the text is right antagonist.

2. Text 2 Katy Perry – “Katy and Russell, Going Strong”

a. Attitude and Engagement Analysis Table 4.2.1 Attitudes and Engagement Analysis

– ―Katy and Russell, Going Strong‖ Clause no. Appraising items Engagement Affect Judg. Appr. Appraised Types of items 1. Katy and Russell, going strong Monogloss + cap Katy Perry and Russell Clause: Relational Process 3. and its been at least a few months Monogloss + reac quality Month Nominal group: Epithet 4. Katy Perry and Russell Brand went on a romantic outing to catch a movie in Hollywood on Tuesday Monogloss + reac quality Katy Perry and Russell’s outing Nominal group: Epithet 5. The two have a lot in common – Monogloss + norm Katy Perry and Russell’s Nom. group: Epithet 6. sunglasses, skinny jeans and a love for films? Monogloss + reac quality Films Words: Attitudinal Lexis 7. More power to ya Monogloss + sat Admi- ration Support to Katy Perry and Russell’s relationship Minor clause Number 1 2 3 Percentage 16.7

33.3 50

commit to user 79 There are 7 attitudes from 7 clauses in this text, which spreads evenly within them. Not only affect and appreciation, but judgment is also often used here. They are 1 affect, 2 judgments, and 3 appreciations. The type of affect is satisfaction , the types of judgment are capacity and normality, and the type of appreciation is reaction: quality. Again, Perez Hilton puts his own affect at the end part of the text. 100 attitudes are positive. Those positive attitudes are directed to the artist Katy Perry, and they are truly positive. It means the writer gives good evaluations to Katy Perry. The appraising items are in the form of word 1 attitudinal lexis item, nominal group 3 items of epithet, clause 1 item of relational process, and minor clause 1 item. Meanwhile, the source of the attitudes is all monogloss, which means that the writer likes to put attitudes on his text and does not find other sources to support the information.

b. Graduation Analysis Table 4.2.2 Graduation Analysis

– ―Katy and Russell, Going Strong‖ Clause No. Appraising items Force Focus Form Meaning Intensification Quantification 1. Katy and Russell, going strong Process - - Iso – up-scaled – intensifier 3. and its been at least a few months - Number - Iso – down-scaled – intensifier 4. Katy Perry and Russell Brand went on a romantic outing to catch a movie in Hollywood on Quality - Inf – up-scaled – Attitudinal Lexis commit to user 80 Tuesday 5. The two have a lot in common - Number - Iso – up-scaled – intensifier 6. sunglasses, skinny jeans and a love for films? Quality - - Inf – up-scaled – Attitudinal lexis 7. More power to ya Process - - Iso – up-scaled – intensifier The amplifications of the attitudes in this text are up-scaled and down- scaled as well. This means Perez Hilton does not too accentuate the diction, but he just expresses his understandable words to clarify the evaluation to the artist. The graduation is all force; 4 intensifications and 2 quantifications. The intensification is process and quality, the quantification is number only. The forms are 4 isolating items and 2 infusion items. Meanwhile, the types of the force are 5 intensifier, and 1 attitudinal lexis.

c. Genre Analysis

Dokumen yang terkait

AN ANALYSIS OF REGISTER, GENRE AND IDEOLOGY OF ARTICLES IN READER’S DIGEST MAGAZINE (A Comparative Study Based on Systemic Functional Linguistics)

0 4 116

A TENOR ANALYSIS OF SHORT STORY ENTITLED CAT IN THE RAIN BY ERNEST HEMINGWAY (A Study Based On Systemic Functional Linguistics)

2 7 166

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF APPRAISALS OF TWO TEXTS ON OPINION COLUMN IN THE JAKARTA POST EXPOSING THE BAILOUT OF BANK CENTURY (Based on Systemic Functional Linguistics Approach)

0 3 110

A Comparative Analysis of Appraisal between Editorial and Opinion Column Exposing Ahmadiyah Issue Published on The Jakarta Globe and The Jakarta Post Websites (A Study Based on Systemic Functional Linguistics)

0 2 216

A Comparative Analysis on Appraisal of Two Texts Exposing the Controversy of Sex Education Given in US Public Schools (Based on Systemic Functional Linguistics Study)

1 3 115

PENGGUNAAN SOFTWARE FESTO FLUIDSIM UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN SISWA PADA A SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS PERSPECTIVE: AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS (A Case Study).

0 0 17

THEMATIC PROGRESSION IN STUDENTS’ EXPLANATORY TEXTS: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective.

0 0 26

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF APPRAISAL IN YOUR LETTERS COLUMN EXPOSING THE ISSUE OF INFOTAINMENT BANNING TAKEN FROM WWW.THEJAKARTAPOST.COM (Systemic Functional Linguistics Approach).

0 0 119

INTERPERSONAL MEANING ANALYSIS OF MUSE SONG LYRICS IN BLACK HOLES AND REVELATIONS’ ALBUM (A Study Based on Systemic Functional Linguistics).

0 1 82

AN ANALYSIS OF READABILITY LEVEL OF SHORT STORIES WITH LESS THAN 300 WORDS TAKEN FROM O, THE OPRAH MAGAZINE (A STUDY BASED ON A SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS APPROACH)

0 0 14