second meeting would be guided practice. In this meeting, the teacher would give some tasks so that the students could practice using Mind Mapping technique in reading. In the
third meeting, the students would independently use Mind Mapping Bubble to help them comprehend the text.
In the beginning of each meeting, the teacher, that was also the researcher, would remind  them  about  the  previous  materials  and  explain  how  to  use  Mind  Mapping
technique  in  reading.  The  teacher  would  also  use  slide  shows  as  the  media  to  attract students’ interest. At the end of the cycle, the teacher would do some assessments.
2. Actions and Observation
During the actions, the researcher worked with a collaborator, the English teacher of  SMP  BOPKRI  3.  When  the  researcher  played  the  role  as  a  teacher,  the  collaborator
helped  him  observe  the  class  and  give  feedback.  In  the  end  of  the  meeting,  the collaborator would gave some reflection and recommendation about the meeting.
As it was planned, Cycle I was conducted in three meetings. In the first meeting, the  teacher  gave  some  examples  or  models  on  how  using  Mind  Mapping  to  help  the
students comprehend the content of written text. In the second meeting, the students were guided  by  the  teacher  to  practice  using  Mind  Mapping  in  reading.  In  the  third  meeting,
the  students  practiced  using  Mind  Mapping  independently.  The  details  of  each  meeting are presented below.
a.  Meeting 1 The first meeting was conducted on March 4
th,
2014. Previously on February 28
th
, 2014, the researcher conducted a pretest and gave some briefing about the research. The
researcher explained his attempt to solve the students’ reading comprehension problems through  Mind  Mapping  technique.  The  researcher  also  gave  a  brief  explanation  about
Mind Mapping technique. On  March  4
th
,  the  researcher  started  the  lesson  by  asking  about  the  students’ favorite story. The students answered variously. Then the researcher asked them to retell
the  story  briefly  but  the  students  suddenly  felt  shy  and  kept  silent.  After  the  researcher
allowed  them  to  used  mixed  language  English-Indonesia  to  retell  the  story,  some students  wanted  to  try.  Then  the  researcher  started  to  introduce  The  Ugly  Duckling
narrative text. The researcher distributed the students’ sheet and prepared the text in slide show.
Then the researcher asked some students randomly to read the text. The first student read the first paragraph, then the next one should read the second paragraph and so on. After
reading the text  once, the researcher checked the student understanding by  asking some questions related to the text. The students could answer the simple question such as about
the  name  of  the  characters  correctly,  but  for  the  next  questions,  they  kept  silent.  The researchers  asked  about  their  difficulty  in  comprehending  the  text.  One  of  the  students
answered in Bahasa Indonesia, “gak paham pak, teksnya panjang jadi bingung jawab soal dan nyari artinya nya”
Then,  the  researcher  read  the  text  once  again  in  order  to  make  the  students understand  better.  After  reading  the  text,  the  researcher  asked  the  students  to  mention
difficult vocabularies and try to find the meaning together from the dictionary. Moreover, the  researcher  also  helped  the  students  to  translate  some  sentences.  Therefore,  the
students could comprehend the text better since they knew the meaning of the words used in  the  text.  Then,  the  researcher  introduced  them  about  how  to  use  Mind  Mapping
technique. The researcher showed the Mind Mapping of narrative text in the slide show. Together  with  the  students,  the  researcher  filled  the  bubble  based  on  the  story.  Some
students actively answered each question from the researcher. After finishing the bubble, the researcher called on some students to answer about the detailed information from the
story.  Most  of  them  could  answer  the  questions  correctly  although  they  mixed  it  with Bahasa Indonesia in answering.
In the end of the meeting, the researcher explained about the activities they would do in the next meeting. The researcher also asked if the students still had questions during
the lesson. b.  Meeting 2