41
was successful or not. In this case, the writer and the observer collaboratively discussed
how far this method can improve the students’ understanding in degrees of comparison of adjectives. From the data
observation in implementation of CAR showed that the student can improve their grammar comprehension of the material on degrees of
comparison of adjectives.
c. The Result of Post Questionnaire
The post- questionnaire was conducted to know about the students’
response after learning degrees of comparison of adjectives through CTL. The following was the description of the result of post questionnaire:
Table 4.2 The Result of Post Questionnaire
Students’ Answer The Result of Student’s Answer
Yes No
Students like the material degrees of comparison of adjectives
20 71.4
8 28.6
The teaching learning process was
easier to understand
.
23 82.1
5 17.9
The students felt motivated in teaching learning process after the implementation of
CTL
18 64.2
10 35.8
The strategy was suitable with the students’ expectation.
26 92.8
2 7.2
The students could remember the formula of degree of comparison easier than before.
19 67.9
9 32.1
The students could do the exercise of degrees of comparison of adjectives
25 89.3
3 10.7
The students ability in making the sentence was better than before the implementation of
CTL
27 96.4
1 3.6
42
The students could make sentences of degrees of comparison of adjectives quickly
and easily after the implementation of CTL
25 89.3
3 10.7
The Students prefer of CTL method than the teaching method before the implementation
of CTL
27 96.4
1 3.6
CTL method made students more active and creative in learning English
25 89.3
3 10.7
Students used the opportunity to give question
8 28.6
20 71.4
The students are
able to do the tasks assigned by teachers individually after the
implementation of CTL
24 85.7
4 14.3
CTL makes students happy and easy to understand lessons
27 96.4
1 3.6
The students feel more enjoy in learning degrees of comparison of adjectives
than before the implementation of CTL
23 82.1
5 17.9
The strategy could help the students to implement the material in their daily life.
23 82.1
5 17.9
Based on preceding the result of post questionnaire, the researcher concluded that there was improvement since most the students really
responded positively and research has already met the criterion of action research. It showed that 26 students 92.8 the strategy was suitable with
the students’ expatiation, 27 students 96.4
The students’ ability in making the sentence was better than before the implementation of CTL, 27 students
96.4 The Students prefer of CTL method than the teaching method before the implementation of CTL, and 27 students 96.4
CTL makes students happy and easy to understand lessons.
43
d. The result of Pre-test, Post-test I and Post-test II
