CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

121 activities and resources. The fourth step of RD was preliminary field testing. In this step, the writer involved the last step of Kemp’s Instructional Design named evaluation in which the feedbacks from the teachers, language teaching expert and Information and Technology experts were taking into account in revising the designed material. Feedbacks are needed in order to get the perspective and opinions from the experts concerning the designed material. As a result, questionnaires were distributed to the experts after the material have been designed. The questionnaires were distributed to two English teachers of SMP Maria Immaculata Yogyakarta, two English lecturers of Sanata Dharma University Yogyakarta, and two Information and Technology IT lecturers from Sanata Dharma University Yogy akarta and STIMIK Akakom Yogyakarta. Based on the experts’ judgments results, it could be concluded that the material were good and could be used for the students. It was showed by the questionnaire results which showed the mean score of 3.8. This activity belongs to the fifth step of RD named main field testing. Some revisions have been made based on the feedbacks given by the experts covering the revision for the ungrammatical sentences, scoring system, navigation, and lay out. After being revised, the material were given to the students in order to get their opinions and feedbacks. The input from the students was being used for the main product revision which could be concluded as the last step of RD employed by the writer. There were some findings found that might not match the core of the designed material after the material being given to the students. The material were 122 designed as semi-flexible for the students still could select which exercises they want to do first but there was a track that students need to walk on. The material was designed applying reading principles which consisted of pre-reading activities, main reading activities, and post-reading activities. The flexible area in the learning material was in the main reading activity only covering text exploration, vocabulary, exercises, and reading skills. The students were flexible in selecting which one they want to do first. In the reality, the students were not a hundred percent ready to be given the chance to select which one they could learn first. There were two main reasons for that. First, it will consume more time since the students would find difficulty in choosing the material they pick. On the contrary, their time was limited concerning to the learning hours allocated and the media provided. As addition, the material would be given in the school only by taking a consideration that not all students had computer at home to work on the computer-assisted reading material. Second, by having random exercises, the students will have different score to document. It would be better to decide which exercises that they have to work on. There were other two findings that could be taken into account for the improvement of the teaching learning activities using computer as learning media. First, the students found out that learning reading using computer as the media gave them new atmosphere that could boost up their enthusiasm in learning. Thus, they could explore the material by themselves with minimum dependency on the teacher. Supported with clear instructions, computer-assisted reading material could be alternative for them in finding the excitement of learning reading by their 123 own. Second, the variety of learning exercises attracted the students’ attention to explore more on the reading material . It was effective in reducing the students’ boredom in learning reading since the exercises were also completed with colorful illustration. The students agreed that there were four exercises that they like to work on. Those exercises were stated according to the one with highest rank to the lowest rank, namely multiple choice, matching, crossword, and cloze test.

B. SUGGESTIONS

In this part, the writer provides suggestions for the English teachers of SMP Maria Immaculata Yogyakarta and future researchers who are interested in conducting research in similar topic. The first suggestion goes for the English teachers. It would be essential for the teachers to gain information on the alternative teaching media that could be used in class. Then, they need to seek for information of the students’ interest in learning so that it could be a good input that could help them providing the appropriate teaching media for the students. Gaining information on the tools to create the learning media is another essential thing that the teachers need to prepare. Well preparation and careful design will give a good result. A will to study a new thing is a must. The new things could be everything, but in this research, the new thing refers to the maximal use of computer as the learning media. Computer should be seen as supportive device that could be used maximally to support their teaching and learning process instead of something hard to learn and not the thing they have to master. 124 The second suggestion will be for the future researchers. It would be better to be updated to the new applications or any other tools to develop computer- assisted learning material. Thus, having broad knowledge of what is the learning media trend especially in using computer as the learning media could be taken into account. Moreover, being creative in selecting the kinds of exercises, layout and in designing the designed material would be a very beneficial thing. 125 BIBLIOGRAPHY Anderson, N. 2003. Teaching Reading. In David Nunan Ed.. Practical English Language Teaching First Edition. New York: McGraw Hill. Beatty, K. 2003. Teaching and Researching Computer-Assisted Language Learning. New York: Longman. Bhatti, M.R. 2013. Teaching Reading through Computer Assisted Language Learning. The Electronic Journal for English as Second Language, Volume 17, number 2. Retrieved from http:www.tesl- ej.orgwordpressissuesvolume17ej66ej66a3 , accessed on Dec 10, 2014. Brown, H. Douglas. 2007. Teaching by Principles, An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy 3 rd Edition. New York: Pearson Education, Inc. Bryant, A and Bryant and Charmaz, K. Eds. 2007. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: Sage. Chapelle, C. A. 2001. Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Cambridge. Christensen, Larry and Johnson, Burke. 2012. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches 4 th Edition. Los Angeles: Sage Publication Inc. Cohen, Louis, Manion, Lawrence, and Morrison, Keith. 2011. Research Methods in Education 7 th Edition. New York: Routledge. Dale, E. and O’Rourke, J. 1971. Techniques of Teaching Vocabulary. Memo Park: The BenjaminCummings Publishing Company. Darwesh, Abu-Jabbar Ali. 2010. Cloze Test: An Integrative Approach. Journal of the College of the Basic Education 15, 105-116. Davies, G., Rendall, H., and Walker, R. 2004. ICT4LT Module 1.4: Introduction to Computer Assisted Language Learning CALL, retrieved on October 18, 2014from http:www.ict4lt.orgenen_mod1-4.htm . Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2007. Materi Sosialisasi dan Pelatihan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan SMP. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.