a. Problems
From data description above, the writer gives some analyses; they are: 1.  Students are still not absolutely sure or connect with their understanding,
exactly  when  the  writer  gave  them  an  essay  test.  Sometimes,  they  still need many times to think the answer or to find the answer. Clearly, they
still need any times to solve the problems in essay test. 2.  Students still feel so seriously during the test. And it is still not match
with  the  function  of  Smart  Solution  Method  exactly  in  using  right brain  process.  So  it  could  be  a big  effect  for  them  in  solving  such  a
test. 3.  The writer found any problems especially coming from the students as
participant. The writer can not take any guarantee for their attendance 100 percent in the classroom.
b. Advantages
From description data above, the writer extremely believes that Smart Solution could be one solution of English teaching method in  Indonesia.
In  case  of  multiple  choice  tests,  using  Smart  Solution  Method  is  very effective  and  efficient  than  any  others.  They  can  answer  easily  many
questions  in  multiple  choice  tests  so  it  could be absolutely  effective  and efficient in time.
Adapted from Twelfth Grade students observation at PRIMAGAMA Pisangan -Ciputat
3.  Data of using smart solution method is effective
The  writer  did  this  research  on  May  31
st
2008.  Before  the  activity  of teaching  gerund  is  begun,  the  writer  gave  the  question  sheet  see  on  the
appendix about  gerund  to  Miss  Mujiati,  S.Pd  as  an  English  tentor,  then  she
delivered  it  to  the  students.  This  activity  was  handled by Miss  Mujiati,  S.Pd. and followed by twelve students. Here is the result that can be presented in the
table 3.2 below:
Table 3.2 The Result of Using Smart solution method in teaching gerund
First session on May 31
st
2008 Numbers of True
Number of False No
Names of Student
Multiple Choice
Essays Total
Multiple Choice
Essays Total
1. Ferry Herdiansyah
9 3
12 1
2 3
2. Dimas
9 4
13 1
1 2
3 Racka
8 4
12 2
1 3
4 Ika Yuliandri
8 4
12 2
1 3
5 Friska Septiani
8 5
13 1
1 2
6 Sulistia
9 5
14 1
1 7
Indah Permata Sari 9
5 14
1 1
8 Wildan Nugroho
7 4
11 3
1 4
9 Muh. Wahid
10 4
14 1
1 10
Meydina
Kusumawati
9 5
14 1
1 11
Linda 8
5 13
2 2
12 Diana sari
8 4
12 2
1 3
Adapted from twelfth grade students of PRIMAGAMA Pisangan-Ciputat
We can see that the comparison the total  numbers of true is still  higher than the  total  numbers  of  false.  We  also  can  see  that  the  error of  total  numbers  from
their  answers  only  a  few.  The  participants  in  this  observation  are  absolutely enthusiastic.  The  total  numbers  of  participant  should  have  twelve  students  and
nobody was absent in this observation. The writer did this research again on November 25
th
2008. Before the activity of  teaching  gerund  is  begun,  the  writer  gave  the  question  sheet  see  on  the
appendix about  gerund  to  Miss  Rika  Rostika  as  an  English  tentor,  then  she
delivered it to the  students. This activity was  handled by Miss Rika  Rostika and
followed by twelve  students. Here  is the result that can be presented in the table 3.3 below:
Table 3.3 The Result of Using Smart solution method in teaching gerund
Second session on November 25
th
2008 Numbers of True
Number of False No
Names of Student
Multiple Choice
Essays Total
Multiple Choice
Essays Total
1. Ferry Herdiansyah
10 4
14 1
1 2.
Dimas 10
3 13
2 2
3 Racka
10 4
14 1
1 4
Ika Yuliandri 10
3 13
2 2
5 Friska Septiani
10 3
13 2
2 6
Sulistia 10
4 14
1 1
7 Indah Permata Sari
10 4
14 1
1 8
Wildan Nugroho 10
4 14
1 1
9 Muh. Wahid
10 4
14 1
1 10
Meydina
Kusumawati
9 5
14 1
1 11
Linda 10
3 13
2 2
12 Diana sari
10 4
14 1
1
Adapted from twelfth grade students of PRIMAGAMA Pisangan-Ciputat
We can see that the comparison the total  numbers of true is still  higher than the  total  numbers  of  false.  We  also  can  see  that  the  error of  total  numbers  from
their  answers  only  a  few.  The  participants  in  this  observation  are  absolutely enthusiastic.  Moreover,  there  are  some  great  scores’  changing  from  the  total
number  of  true  more  significantly  than  the  result  of  first  observation.  The  total numbers of participant should have twelve students and nobody was absent in this
observation.
CHAPTER IV CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
In this chapter, the writer concludes the results of study based on the research
was done at PRIMAGAMA Pisangan-Ciputat and suggests for the English tentor in particular and for PRIMAGAMA itself in general. It consists of conclusion and
suggestion.
A.  Conclusion
Based on the research conducted by the writer, he concludes some points as follows;
1.  About teaching procedure using smart solution method The  teaching  procedure  of  using  smart  solution  method  in  teaching
gerund was good and has fulfilled the good criteria of lesson plan based on KTSP  curriculum  and  it  has  fulfilled  the  aspects  of  language  learning
domains  such  as  cognitive  domain,  affective  domain,  and  psychometric domain.
2.  About the advantage of using Smart solution method The  advantage  using  Smart  solution  method  was  really  effective  and
efficient  in  time  in  case  of  multiple  choice  tests  than  any  others  and  it could be one alternative of English teaching method in Indonesia. But the
critic  for PRIMAGAMA about the effect of using  smart solution method that  smart  solution  method  is  not  successful  enough  to  make  students
interested  in  joining  in  PRMAGAMA  in  general  because  we  can  know from  the  result  of  students’  documentation  that  the  total  numbers  of
student  in  the  class  does  not  fulfill  the  capacity  of  an  ideal  class.  The capacity  of  class  ideally  consists  of  fifteen  students  but  the  writer  found
that the quota for class at PRIMAGAMA is still shortage of number.