Background of The Study

2 It is important to understand the meaning of someone utterances, so both the speaker and the hearer understand each other and they can communicate well. There will be misunderstanding if the hearer can not get the meaning of the speaker utterances. For example, when someone says “do that again, and I’ll kick you”, it means that the speaker doesn’t try to make a request to do something, but he tries to make a threat in order to stop what the hearer do. In case of this situation, the hearer should be able to understand the meaning of the speaker utterances to avoid the misunderstanding. This study describes the form of speech acts in a dialogue at the Faculty of Cultural Studies USU in data collection, see the method used followed by a technical note as advanced techniques. While the assessment of data used descriptive analysis method. The theory used in this research is the theory of speech acts by JL Austin. From the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that the acts of locutions, illocutionary acts, and acts perlocution many students in dialogue Faculty of Cultural Studies USU, Follow locutions is a form of speech acts are most commonly found in the dialogue. Furthermore, forms of speech acts less common in the dialogue dialogue is illocutionary acts and perlocution. One way of appreciating the distinctive features of speech acts is in contrast with other well-established phenomena within the philosophy of language. Accordingly in this entry I will consider the relation among speech acts and: semantic content, grammatical mood, speaker- meaning, logically perfect languages, perlocutions, performatives, presuppositions, and implicature. This will enable us to situate speech acts within their ecological niche. 3 The background of this thesis is about the uses of the students’ speech act at Faculty of Cultural Studies Canteen University of Sumatera Utara, but only covers some of the department, why I chose this title? because most students very compose in their speech act, with a slang term that is often used to talk during activity but not all students know what they talking about, therefore occurred to me to analyze what they are saying that all students of Culture Science understand what the meaning of the utterance. Pragmatics, as a branch of linguistics, plays its role to study about the meaning of language and its relation to the context. In the theory of pragmatics, there are three types of acts locutionary acts, illocutionary acts, and perlocutionary acts, they are called speech acts. Speech acts as the center of pragmatic study, is defined as a study of how to do the things with words. In general, we recognize the types of act performed by a speaker in uttering a sentence such as ordering, requesting, begging, offering, inviting and others.In studying pragmatics, we focus on how to utter a speech, so the hearer can interpret its meaning. J.R. Searle 1965:105 states:“Behind the word, there is a hidden meaning we want to convey.” He states that on the utterance has two kinds of meaning, i.e. propositional meaning and illocutionary meaning. Propositional meaning is a basic literal meaning of the utterance which is conveyed by the particular words and a structure which the utterance contains while illocutionary meaning is the hidden meaning or the effect of the utterance or written text has on the hearer or reader. When a speaker says “can you take the rubbish outside?” to his maid, It is more than just a question of the ability of the maid whether she is strong enough to take the rubbish outside, but it is a kind of command that is uttered in such away. 4 Semantically, we may interpret the utterance as the act of questioning, but we can interpret it as an act of ordering pragmatically. The example above is a kind of illocutionary act that may be concluded that in language there should be an act can be performed. So, the sentence “can you take the rubbish outside?” contains at least two acts, i.e. requesting and ordering. Illocutionary act is an act performed in saying something. It is something the speaker intends to do in making the utterance. This act is performed within the full control of the speaker and it is the evident after the utterance is made. The illocutionary act is carried out by speaker in making an utterance’s significance within a conventional system of social intention. It is important to understand the meaning of someone utterances, so both the speaker and the hearer understand each other and they can communicate well. There will be misunderstanding if the hearer can not get the meaning of the speaker utterances. For example, when someone says “do that again, and I’ll kick you”, it means that the speaker doesn’t try to make a request to do something, but he tries to make a threat in order to stop what the hearer do. In case of this situation, the hearer should be able to understand the meaning of the speaker utterances to avoid the misunderstanding. J.R. Searle in Said 1997 categorizes the types of illocutionary acts into five categories. 1. Representatives, Which commits the speaker to the truth of the expressed proposition paradigm cases: asserting, concluding; 2. Directives, 5 Which are attempted by the speaker to get the addressee to do something paradigm cases: requesting, questioning; 3.Commissives, Which commits the speaker to some future course of action paradigm cases: promising, threatening, offering; 4. Expressive, Which expresses a psychological state paradigm cases: thanking, apologizing, welcoming and congratulating; 5. Declarations, Which effects immediate changes in the institutional state of affairs and which tends to rely on elaborate extra linguistic institution paradigm cases: excommunicating, declaring war, christening, marrying and firing from employment. This is the reason why this topic is chosen and needed to be discussed. This topic, an analysis of Students’ Speech Act At Faculty of Cultural Studies Canteen Of University of Sumatera Utarawill be analyzed to find out the type of speech act whether To find the meaning of the speaker to analysis the meaning of the speaker.

1.2 The Problem of The Study

Speech act is the actions of performed via utterances. The used of the term speech acts cover such as request, command, and question. Related to the background explained, he problem of the study are formulated as a following : a. What speech act reflected At faculty of Cultural Studies Canteen University Sumatera Utara? 6 b. What type speech act reflected At Faculty of Cultural Studies University Sumatera Utara?

1.3 The Objectives of The Study

This study with the interferences of the student or speaker to the listener in Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera Utara.So the main objectivities of this study are : • To find the meaning of students’ speech act at Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera Utara • To find the type and analyze of students’ speech act at Faculty of Cultural Studies Canteen University of Sumatera Utara

1.4 The Scope of The Study

The scope of the study are the students of Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera Utara who used the speech act language in their dialogue and the writer try to analyze their utterances and the writer try to find the meaning of the speaker and to analysis the meaning of the speaker. The speaker only take four departments, and while that would be observation from the English Department, Arabic department, Japanese Department and Chinese Department. Not all students that I observed, only several years previously the only so within the confines of this issue I just observe and analyze students per Stambuk, and every department would I take two people, who belong from 2010-2014.

1.5 The Significant of The Study