19.0 within Motivasi Kerja 10.5 26.3 63.2 100.0 Total Count 3 14 13 30 Expected Count 3.0 14.0 13.0 30.0 within Motivasi Kerja 10.0 46.7 43.3 100.0 - Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Motivasi Kerja Penyuluh Pertanian di Kabupaten Karo
Lampiran 1. Hasil Uji Chi-Square untuk Penyuluh Pertanian PNS Kabupaten Karo Motivasi Kerja * Kematangan Pribadi Crosstab Kematangan Pribadi Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
14.0
19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 10.5% 26.3% 63.2% 100.0%
Total Count
3
14
13
30 Expected Count
3.0
13.0
8.9
30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 10.0% 46.7% 43.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 12.019
a
4 .017 Likelihood Ratio 13.667 4 .008 Linear-by-Linear Association 5.459 1 .019 N of Valid Cases
30
Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .535 .017
N of Valid Cases
30
8.2
1.9
Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count
7
1
2
3 Expected Count .3
1.4
1.3
3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 33.3% 66.7% .0% 100.0%
Sedang Count
1
19 Expected Count
8 Expected Count .8
3.7
3.5
8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%
Tinggi Count
2
5
12
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,30.
Motivasi Kerja * Tingkat Pendidikan Crosstab Tingkat Pendidikan Total Rendah Tinggi
19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 21.1% 78.9% 100.0% Total Count
30
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .275 .292
Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.
30
2 .292 Likelihood Ratio 3.658 2 .161 Linear-by-Linear Association .057 1 .811 N of Valid Cases
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 2.463 a
30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 16.7% 83.3% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests
25.0
5.0
30 Expected Count
25
5
15.8
Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count
3.2
19 Expected Count
15
4
8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 100.0% 100.0% Tinggi Count
6.7
1.3
8 Expected Count
8
3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% Sedang Count
2.5
3 Expected Count .5
2
1
a. 4 cells (66,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,50.
Motivasi Kerja * Kelelahan dan Kebosanan Crosstab Kelelahan dan Kebosanan Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
4.0
Total Count
7
19
4
30 Expected Count
7.0
19.0
30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 23.3% 63.3% 13.3% 100.0%
2.5
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 3.101 a
4 .541 Likelihood Ratio 4.585 4 .333 Linear-by-Linear Association .394 1 .530 N of Valid Cases
30
Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .306 .541
N of Valid Cases
30
19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 26.3% 57.9% 15.8% 100.0%
12.0
Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count
8 Expected Count
2
1
3 Expected Count .7 1.9 .4
3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
Sedang Count
2
6
1.9
4.4
5.1
1.1
8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 25.0% 75.0% .0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count
5
11
3
19 Expected Count
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,40.
Motivasi Kerja * Keinginan Crosstab Keinginan Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
17.0
19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 5.3% 78.9% 15.8% 100.0%
Total Count
8
17
5
30 Expected Count
8.0
5.0
10.8
30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 26.7% 56.7% 16.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 14.465 a
4 .006 Likelihood Ratio 16.098 4 .003 Linear-by-Linear Association 5.318 1 .021 N of Valid Cases
30
Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .570 .006
N of Valid Cases
30
3.2
5.1
Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count
2
2
1
3 Expected Count .8 1.7 .5
3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 66.7% 33.3% .0% 100.0%
Sedang Count
5
1
8 Expected Count
19 Expected Count
2.1
4.5
1.3
8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 62.5% 12.5% 25.0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count
1
15
3
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,50.
Motivasi Kerja * Kepuasan Kerja Crosstab Kepuasan Kerja Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
13.0
7.0
19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 15.8% 31.6% 52.6% 100.0%
Total Count
6
13
11
30 Expected Count
6.0
11.0
3.8
30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 20.0% 43.3% 36.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 9.881
a
4 .042 Likelihood Ratio 9.795 4 .044 Linear-by-Linear Association 5.343 1 .021 N of Valid Cases
30
Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient
.498 .042 N of Valid Cases
30
8.2
19 Expected Count
Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count
6
2
1
3 Expected Count .6
1.3
1.1
3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 66.7% 33.3% .0% 100.0%
Sedang Count
1
1
10
8 Expected Count
1.6
3.5
2.9
8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 12.5% 75.0% 12.5% 100.0%
Tinggi Count
3
6
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,60.
Motivasi Kerja * Kompensasi Crosstab Kompensasi Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
15.0
19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 10.5% 36.8% 52.6% 100.0%
Total Count
5
15
10
30 Expected Count
5.0
10.0
9.5
30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 16.7% 50.0% 33.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 13.877
a
4 .008 Likelihood Ratio 15.015 4 .005 Linear-by-Linear Association 8.175 1 .004 N of Valid Cases
30
Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .562 .008
N of Valid Cases
30
6.3
3.2
Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count
7
2
1
3 Expected Count .5
1.5
1.0
3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 66.7% 33.3% .0% 100.0%
Sedang Count
1
8 Expected Count
19 Expected Count
1.3
4.0
2.7
8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 12.5% 87.5% .0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count
2
7
10
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,50.
Motivasi Kerja * Peraturan Crosstab Peraturan Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
4.0
19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 26.3% 10.5% 63.2% 100.0%
Total Count
6
4
20
30 Expected Count
6.0
20.0
2.5
30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 20.0% 13.3% 66.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 2.339 a
4 .674 Likelihood Ratio 2.678 4 .613 Linear-by-Linear Association .673 1 .412 N of Valid Cases
30
Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .269 .674
N of Valid Cases
30
12.7
3.8
Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count
6
1
2
3 Expected Count .6 .4
2.0
3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%
Sedang Count
1
1
8 Expected Count
19 Expected Count
1.6
1.1
5.3
8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 12.5% 12.5% 75.0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count
5
2
12
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,40.
Lampiran 2. Hasil Uji Chi-Square untuk Penyuluh Pertanian THL-TB PP Kabupaten Karo Motivasi Kerja * Kematangan Pribadi Crosstab Kematangan Pribadi Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
4.0
Total Count
5
21
4
30 Expected Count
5.0
21.0
30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 16.7% 70.0% 13.3% 100.0%
2.5
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 9.890 a
4 .042 Likelihood Ratio 10.629 4 .031 Linear-by-Linear Association 2.998 1 .083 N of Valid Cases
30
Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .498 .042
N of Valid Cases
30
19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 15.8% 63.2% 21.1% 100.0%
13.3
Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count
1.3
2
1
3 Expected Count .5 2.1 .4
3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 66.7% 33.3% .0% 100.0%
Sedang Count
8
8 Expected Count
5.6
3.2
1.1
8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count
3
12
4
19 Expected Count
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,40.
Lampiran 2. Hasil Uji Chi-Square untuk Penyuluh Pertanian THL-TB PP Kabupaten Karo Motivasi Kerja * Kematangan Pribadi Crosstab Kematangan Pribadi Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
4.0
Total Count
5
21
4
30 Expected Count
5.0
21.0
30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 16.7% 70.0% 13.3% 100.0%
2.5
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 9.890 a
4 .042 Likelihood Ratio 10.629 4 .031 Linear-by-Linear Association 2.998 1 .083 N of Valid Cases
30
Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .498 .042
N of Valid Cases
30
19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 15.8% 63.2% 21.1% 100.0%
13.3
Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count
1.3
2
1
3 Expected Count .5 2.1 .4
3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 66.7% 33.3% .0% 100.0%
Sedang Count
8
8 Expected Count
5.6
3.2
1.1
8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count
3
12
4
19 Expected Count
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,40.
Motivasi Kerja * Tingkat Pendidikan Crosstab Tingkat Pendidikan Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
22.0
6
2
22
30 Expected Count
6.0
2.0
30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 20.0% 6.7% 73.3% 100.0%
19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 26.3% 10.5% 63.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Pearson Chi-Square 4.466 a
4 .347 Likelihood Ratio 6.589 4 .159 Linear-by-Linear Association .710 1 .399 N of Valid Cases
30
Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .360 .347
N of Valid Cases
30
Total Count
13.9
Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count
8 Expected Count 1.6 .5
1
2
3 Expected Count .6 .2
2.2
3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 33.3% .0% 66.7% 100.0%
Sedang Count
8
5.9
1.3
8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% .0% 100.0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count
5
2
12
19 Expected Count
3.8
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,20.
Motivasi Kerja * Kelelahan dan Kebosanan Crosstab Kelelahan dan Kebosanan
5.0
Total Count
4
21
5
30 Expected Count
4.0
21.0
30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 13.3% 70.0% 16.7% 100.0%
3.2
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 3.422 a
4 .490 Likelihood Ratio 4.864 4 .302 Linear-by-Linear Association .052 1 .819 N of Valid Cases
30
Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .320 .490
N of Valid Cases
30
19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 10.5% 68.4% 21.1% 100.0%
13.3
Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count
8 Expected Count
2
1
3 Expected Count .4 2.1 .5
3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
Sedang Count
2
6
1.1
2.5
5.6
1.3
8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 25.0% 75.0% .0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count
2
13
4
19 Expected Count
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,40.
Motivasi Kerja * Keinginan Crosstab Keinginan Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
17.0
Total Count
2
11
17
30 Expected Count
2.0
11.0
30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 6.7% 36.7% 56.7% 100.0%
10.8
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 23.210 a
4 .000 Likelihood Ratio 15.912 4 .003 Linear-by-Linear Association 11.985 1 .001 N of Valid Cases
30
Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .660 .000
N of Valid Cases
30
19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 26.3% 73.7% 100.0%
7.0
Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count
5
2
1
3 Expected Count .2
1.1
1.7
3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 66.7% 33.3% .0% 100.0%
Sedang Count
3
1.3
8 Expected Count .5
2.9
4.5
8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 62.5% 37.5% 100.0%
Tinggi Count
5
14
19 Expected Count
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,20.
Motivasi Kerja * Kepuasan Kerja Crosstab Kepuasan Kerja Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
14.0
19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 21.1% 26.3% 52.6% 100.0%
Total Count
4
14
12
30 Expected Count
4.0
12.0
8.9
30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 13.3% 46.7% 40.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 9.615 a
4 .047 Likelihood Ratio 11.801 4 .019 Linear-by-Linear Association .467 1 .495 N of Valid Cases
30
Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .493 .047
N of Valid Cases
30
7.6
2.5
Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count
2
3
3 Expected Count .4
1.4
1.2
3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%
Sedang Count
6
8 Expected Count
19 Expected Count
1.1
3.7
3.2
8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count
4
5
10
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,40.
Motivasi Kerja * Kompensasi Crosstab Kompensasi Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 3.3% 73.3% 23.3% 100.0%
22
7
30 Expected Count
1.0
22.0
7.0
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 14.115
a
Total Count
4 .007 Likelihood Ratio 11.996 4 .017 Linear-by-Linear Association 7.296 1 .007 N of Valid Cases
30
Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient
.566 .007 N of Valid Cases
30
1
19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 63.2% 36.8% 100.0%
Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count
8 Expected Count .3
1
2
3 Expected Count .1 2.2 .7
3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 33.3% 66.7% .0% 100.0%
Sedang Count
8
5.9
4.4
1.9
8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count
12
7
19 Expected Count .6
13.9
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,10.
Motivasi Kerja * Peraturan Crosstab Peraturan Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
24.0
4
2
24
30 Expected Count
4.0
2.0
30.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 13.3% 6.7% 80.0% 100.0%
19.0 % within Motivasi Kerja 21.1% 5.3% 73.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 3.281
a
4 .512 Likelihood Ratio 4.729 4 .316 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.974 1 .160 N of Valid Cases
30
Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .314 .512
N of Valid Cases
30
Total Count
15.2
Motivasi Kerja Rendah Count
8 Expected Count 1.1 .5
3
3 Expected Count .4 .2
2.4
3.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% .0% 100.0% 100.0%
Sedang Count
1
7
6.4
1.3
8.0 % within Motivasi Kerja .0% 12.5% 87.5% 100.0%
Tinggi Count
4
1
14
19 Expected Count
2.5
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,20.
Lampiran 3. Data Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Motivasi Kerja Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo
1. Data Faktor Kematangan Pribadi Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo No. Resp Gangguan kesehatan Masa kerja Ilmu Pengetahuan Faktor Lingkungan Pesta Adat Jumlah Score 1.
3
21
4
4
3
19
2 21.
4
3
4
5
5
3 22.
4
4
4
4
5
4
21
3 23.
4
3
4
4
3 20.
5
4
1
16
2 17.
5
4
3
5
4
21
3 18.
3
21
4
5
5
21
3 19.
3
4
4
5
5
5
21
3
4
2 28.
5
4
3
5
5
22
3 29.
4
3
5
3
5
21
3 30.
4
3
4
5
1
17
2 Score : Rendah = 10-15 Sedang = 16-20 Tinggi = ˃ 20
17
4
3 24.
3
4
3
3
3
3
16
2 25.
4
3
2
1
3
13
1 26.
3
3
3
3
2
14
1 27.
4
3
5
3
3
21
3
4
2
17
2 6.
5
4
3
4
5
3 7.
4
4
4
2
5
1
16
2 8.
5
4
3
4
3 5.
3
2 3.
3
3
16
2 2.
4
3
2
3
5
17
4
21
3
3
4
2
16
2 4.
4
4
3
5
5
4
19
4
3
1 13.
4
3
2
3
4
16
2 14.
4
4
5
2
1
17
2 15.
4
4
4
5
4
21
3 16.
15
3
2 9.
5
3
3
3
3
4
16
2 10.
5
4
3
4
3
21
3 11.
5
3
4
5
4
21
3 12.
4
3
4
2. Data Faktor Tingkat Pendidikan Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo No. Resp Tingkat Pendidikan Score 1.
2
5
3 19.
4
3 20.
4
3 21.
4
3 22.
4
3 23.
4
3 24.
2 25.
4
2
2 26.
1
3 27.
1
1 28.
1
1 29.
3
3 30.
1
1 Score : Rendah = 1
Sedang = 2-3 Tinggi = 4-5
3 18.
4
3 2.
3 9.
4
3 3.
4
3 4.
4
3 5.
4
3 6.
4
3 7.
4
3 8.
4
1
4
1 10.
4
3 11.
4
3 12.
4
3 13.
4
3 14.
1
1 15.
4
3 16.
3 17.
3. Data Faktor Kelelahan dan Kebosanan Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo
4
3
2
3
12
2 21.
4
3
5
16
2 20.
3 22.
4
4
2
5
15
3 23.
4
4
4
12
3
9
2
4
12
2 17.
4
2
1
2
1 18.
3
4
4
2
2
12
2 19.
4
2
3
2
13
4
2
5
1
5
3
14
2 29.
4
3
4
15
13
2 30.
4
3
3
4
14
2 Score : Rendah = 9-14
Sedang = 12-14 Tinggi = ˃ 14
3 28.
3
2 24.
2
5
3
3
4
15
2 25.
4
3
2
11
4
1 26.
4
3
3
2
12
2 27.
4
4
2
No. Resp Kebijakan Pimpinan Jam Kerja Dinas
Jam Kerja diluar Dinas Pekerjaan sebagai Penyuluh Jumlah Score
4
14
2 5.
4
3
1
4
12
2 6.
3
2
3
3
13
2 7.
4
3
1
4
12
3
5
4
2
1.
4
3
5
2
14
2 2.
4
1
4
3
10
1 3.
4
3
1
3
11
1 4.
2 8.
2
11
2 14.
1
12
2 13.
4
4
2
2
12
4
3
3
2
2
11
1 15.
4
2
2
3
4
4
2
4
5
13
2 9.
5
4
3
4
16
2 10.
5
1 12.
5
3
17
3 11.
4
2
2
2
10
1 16.
4. Data Faktor Keinginan Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo
5
5
5
3
3
1
5
1
23
1 21.
4
4
5
5
4
4
28
31
3 22.
5
5
1
5
4
5
2
27
2 23.
5
5
5
2 20.
2
3
5
4
5
5
3
5
5
31
3 17.
3
3
2
5
3
5
26
5
24
5
5
5
3
3
1 19.
2
2 18.
5
3
5
5
2
2
5
5
2 16.
5
4
26
2 28.
4
4
5
5
3
5
2
28
2 29.
4
4
5
3
5
˃ 28
2 Score : Rendah = 21-24 Sedang = 25-28 Tinggi =
27
2
5
2
5
2
4
4
2 30.
27
2
5
5
5
3
3
31
3 24.
4
4
5
4
1
5
2
25
2 25.
4
4
5
1
3
5
3
3
3 27.
30
4
5
5
5
5
3
3
2 26.
26
4
4
No.Resp Penghasi lan Pengelu aran
Benda yg dibutuhkan Perlengkapan kerja
5
5
2
27
2 5.
4
3
3
5
3
5
1
24
1 6.
5
3
3
5
3
5
1
27
2 7.
3
3
5
5
4
5
2
27
5
5
5
1
Kebutu han rasa aman Jaminan peker jaan
Penghar gaan yg diharap kan
Jum lah Score 1.
3
3
1
5
5
5
4
26
2 2.
4
4
4
3
5
4
1 4.
23
1
5
1
5
3
2
4
1 3.
23
2
5
2 8.
2
5
24
5
5
1
5
2
22
1 13.
3
3
1
5
3
5
4
1 14.
2
2 15.
5
3
5
5
2
2
28
4
1
5
4
5
5
4
2
3 12.
5
2 10.
3
3
5
1
24
1 9.
3
3
5
5
4
5
3
28
3
30
5
4
5
1
5
5
5
2 11.
3
27
2
5
4
5
5
27
5. Data Faktor Kepuasan Kerja Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo No.
3
2
4
3
1
14
2 21.
5
2
4
4
18
3 20.
3 22.
4
4
5
2
2
17
2 23.
4
2
5
4
18
3
15
4
4
2
15
2 17.
4
1
4
3
3
2 18.
4
4
2
4
4
4
18
3 19.
3
3
4
4
4
18
4
4
1 28.
5
2
4
3
2
16
2 29.
3
2
1
2
1
11
1 30.
3
2
5
4
4
18
3 Score : Rendah = 10-13
Sedang = 14-17 Tinggi = ˃ 17
12
2
3 24.
4
5
1
2
1
2
11
1 25.
4
3
4
4
2
19
3 26.
5
2
4
4
3
18
3 27.
4
2
1
Resp Wilayah kerja
Dukungan rekan sekerja
4
2
19
3 5.
5
1
3
2
3
14
2 6.
2
5
4
2
3
15
2 7.
4
1
4
3
1
13
4
4
4
2
Hubungan kerja Hasil kerja
Penghargaan pimpinan Jumlah Score 1.
3
3
4
5
2
17
2 2.
4
4
4
2
1
13
1 3.
4
1
4
3
2
14
2 4.
1 8.
2
18
1 14.
4
2
17
2 13.
3
2
4
2
2
13
4
3
2
4
5
4
19
3 15.
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
2
2
14
2 9.
5
2
4
2
2
15
2 10.
3
2 12.
4
4
4
18
3 11.
5
2
4
2
3
16
3 16.
6. Data Faktor Kompensasi Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo
5
1
2
3
8
2 21.
2
2
2
11
3 20.
3 22.
2
1
1
1
5
1 23.
2
2
2
11
3
8
2
1
7
2 17.
2
1
2
3
2 18.
5
1
1
2
3
7
2 19.
2
2
2
1
8
2
2
2
1
2
3
8
2 29.
1
2
5
6
10
3 30.
2
1
2
5
10
3 Score : Rendah = 4-6
Sedang = 7-9 Tinggi = ˃ 9
1 28.
1
2 24.
5
2
2
2
2
8
2 25.
2
2
2
11
2
3 26.
1
2
1
1
5
1 27.
2
1
2
No. Resp Tingkat Pendidikan
Jarak tempat tugas
2
11
3 5.
2
2
1
1
6
1 6.
2
2
2
5
11
3 7.
2
2
1
2
7
5
2
2
1
Prestasi kerja Jujur dan adil
Jumlah Score 1.
1
2
2
3
8
2 2.
2
1
2
3
7
2 3.
2
2
1
3
8
2 4.
2 8.
2
11
2 14.
1
5
1 13.
2
2
2
3
9
2
1
2
2
1
7
2 15.
2
2
2
5
2
1
1
2
2
7
2 9.
2
1
2
5
10
3 10.
2
3 12.
1
2
7
2 11.
2
2
2
5
11
3 16.