6
CHAPTER II REVIEW OF LITERATURE
In this chapter, the writer provides three parts that will be discussed. The first part is review of related studies, including other related studies previously.
Second part is review of related theories which provides some theories in doing this research. Third part is theoretical framework which explains the contribution
between the theories and the reviews to solve the problem formulation.
A. Review of Related Studies
This research consists of only one previous study. That research tells about discussing the analysis of directive speech act.
The first undergraduate thesis entitled Politeness Strategies Applied in Directive Speech
Acts According to The Interpersonal Relationships in “The IT Crowd: Moss and The German by Ciptaningrum 2011 from Sanata
Dharma University. The results of the research are: there are five directive speech acts request, suggestion, comment, prohibition, and invitation, four
politeness strategies off record, bald on record, positive, and negative strategy, six types of interpersonal relationship among the characters same-
sex friendship, cross-sex friendship, friendship association, workplace mentoring relationship, networking workplace relationship, and romantic
workplace relationship. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Related to the Ciptaningrum’s research which analyzes about directive speech ach, politeness strategy, and interpersonal relation among the
characters, the writer uses different ways in conducting the result through linguistics. However, Ciptaningrum only focuses on those matters without
analyzing the factors influencing the character to apply politeness strategy in directive speech act.
B. Review of Related Theories
1. Pragmatics
Pragmatics refers to speaker’s meaning or utterance interpretation. The first definition of pragmatics is quoted from Steven C. Levinson,
followed by Jenny Thomas and the last is George Yule. Levinson 1983: 21 states that pragmatics is the study of the ability
of language users to pair sentences with the contexts in which they would be appropriate. It means that pragmatics cannot be separated from context and
principles of language usage. Then, Thomas 1995: 23 defines pragmatics as meaning in interaction.
Another definition of pragmatics is also proposed by Yule 1996: 3- 4. He says that pragmatics is the study of the relationship between
linguistic forms and the users of those forms. Yule divides the definition of pragmatics into four. First, Pragmatics is the study of speaker meaning. It
means that pragmatics analyzes the meaning behind what people say rather than what the words mean literally. Second, Pragmatics is the study of
contextual meaning. Context here includes to whom the speaker talking, where, when, and under what circumstances. Context has important role in
communication between the speaker and the hearer. Third, Pragmatics is the study of how more gets communicated than what is said. By understanding
pragmatics, people can explore what is unsaid be recognized as part of what is communicated. Fourth, Pragmatics is the study of the expression of
relative distance. Relative distances means how close between the speaker and the hearer are communicating each other including physical, social or
conceptual closeness. From the definitions above, it can be concluded that Pragmatics is a
significant field to study in communication that is about language, context, and the meaning of the utterances between the speaker and the hearer.
2. Speech Act
Pragmatics studies how people understand and produce a speech act in a social situation, usually in conversation. Speech act is a part of pragmatics
that studies about utterances. According to Searle in Levinson, 1983: 240, speech act can be classified into five categories, they are representative,
directive, commisive, expressive and declaration.
a. Representative
Representative is a kind of speech acts that commits the speaker to state hisher belief about something. Acts of asserting, describing,
explaining, concluding and making a statement are the examples of the PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
speakers’s intention in uttering hisher belief. Example: The earth is flat. Yule, 1996: 53
b. Directive
Directive is a kind of speech act that is intended to make someone do something. In this case, the speaker utters directive in order to get the
prospective action. Acts of requesting, commanding and persuading can be classified into directive.
Example: Could you lend me a pen, please? Yule, 1996: 54
c. Commisive
Commisive is kind of speech act that commits the speaker to some future action. Acts of promising, refusing, threatening and pledging can
be classified into commisive. Example: We will not do that. Yule, 1996: 54
d. Expressive
Expressive is a kind of speech act that is used by the speaker to express their feeling that are either pain or pleasure. Acts of apologizing,
congratulating and thanking can be classified into expressive. Example: Congratulations Yule, 1996: 53
e. Declarative
Declarative is kind of speech act that is used by the speaker to change the reality in accordance with proposition content of the
declaration. Act of naming and pronouncing are the example of declarative.
Example: I now pronounce you husband and wife. Yule, 1996: 53
3. Requesting speech act
Requesting speech act is commonly used in daily communication which focuses on asking someone the addressee hearer to do something
by giving him or her an option for complying and not complying the request. It is a part of directive speech act in pragmatics as stated by Searle
because request action has an illocutionary purpose to get the hearer to do something. Trosborg 1995: 192 has divided the requesting speech act
according to what the benefit to the speaker and the hearer when they are having conversation. This strategy classifies requesting speech act into four
catagories and involves them eight-sub strategies, namely indirect request, hearer-oriented condition, speaker-based condition and direct request.
a Indirect request
Indirect request is a request without explicit requestive illocutionary force. Consequently, the speaker omits to mention or
specify the desired act and avoids mentioning the hearer as the intended agent Trosborg, 1995:192. There is only one strategy of
indirect request called hinting strategy. Hinting strategy is used by the speaker by making a request which does not explicitly state that the
speaker’s request for the desired action. There are two kinds of hinting strategy. They are 1 mild hint, used by the speaker by leaving out the
desired action altogether, and 2 strong hint, used by the speaker by mentioning hisher wish.
For example: I have to be at the airport in half an hour. Trosborg, 1995: 205
The request above employs indirect request expression with mild hint strategy. The speaker does not explictly mention that the speaker
asks the taxi driver to speed up the taxi since he is in hurry. The speaker leaves out the request, he lets the hearer to figure out by
himself whether the speaker wants to speed up the taxi.
b Hearer-oriented condition
This request conveys that hearer is in a position of control to decide whether or not to perform the request. This request uses two
strategies, that strategies are ability willingness and suggestory formula. 1.
Ability willingness The condition of ability refers to hearer’s capacity to perform the
desired act. Two different conditions are relevant: 1 the inherent capacities of the hearer both physical and mental, 2 the external
circumstances relates to time and place of the action. For example : Could you lend me your car? Trosborg, 1995: 205
2. Suggestory formulae
By using suggestory formulae, the speaker makes hisher request more tentative and plays down hisher own interest as a beneficinary
of the action. For example : How about lending me your car? Trosborg, 1995: 205
c Speaker-based condition
By placing the speaker interest above the hearer’s, this request
becomes more direct in its demand. There are two strategies in speaker-based condition. They are by using whisesdesires and
needsdemands. 1.
Wishes or desires The speaker’s statement of hisher intention maybe expressed
politely as a wish. For example : I would like to borrow your car. Trosborg, 1995:
205 2.
Needs or demands Its a request strategy which expresses the speaker’s request
more blindly as demand. For example : I needs to borrow your car. Trosborg, 1995: 205
d Direct Request
The speaker who wants to make the request in the form of performative statement or an imperative, thereby isuing an order. This
request uses three strategies namely obligation, performative, and imperative.
1. Obligation
This strategy is used by employing a statement of obligation. When employing this strategy, the speaker exerts either hisher authority, or
heshe refers to some authority outside the speaker. For example : You have to lend me your car. Trosborg, 1995: 205
2. Performative
The inclusion of performative verb conveys requestive intent, e.g. asking, requesting, demanding, commanding, and explicitly marking
the utterence as an order. For example : I would like to ask you to borrow your car. Trosborg,
1995: 205 3.
Imperative Imperative is the grammatical form directly signaling that the
utterance is an order. An order issued by authority figures must be obeyed, such as the
older’s to the younger’s. For example : Lend me your car Trosborg, 1995: 205
4. Politeness
Politeness is a complex system for softening face threats Brown and Levinson, 1978: 13. It is also defined as the strategies employed
by the speaker to achieve a variety of goals, such as promoting or maintaing harmonious relationship. Then, Leech 1983: 19 states that
politeness is strategic conflic avoidance which can be measured in terms of the degree of effort put into the avoidance of a conflict
situation. In short, politeness is defined as using communicative strategies to create and maintain social harmony as stated by Culpeper
1996: 349. Politeness can be done in many various ways, they are being contextually appropriate, following social and cultural norms,
and being socially positive by addresing face needs. There are many experts discussing about politeness strategy. This
research only uses politeness strategy proposed by Brown and Lenvinson as an approach to analyze the data. This theory is choosen
to explain about politeness strategy in detail. Brown and Levinson 1987: 92 have divided the politeness strategies according to how
much the speakers and the hearers minimize the threat when they are having conversation. The strategies range from doing the FTA directly
without minimizing the threat at all to not doing FTA. They are bald- on record, positive politeness, negative politeness, and off-record
strategy.
a. Bald-on Record
Bald-on record strategy does not attempt to minimize the threat to hearer’s face. Brown and Levinson state that speaker mostly uses
bald-on record strategy when she wants to do FTA Face Threatening Acts with maximum efficiency toward the hearer’s
face Brown and Levinson, 1987: 95. This strategy will make the PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
hearer feels uncomfortable. This strategy is a direct way of saying things, without any minimization to the imposition, in a direct,
clear, unambiguous, and concise way. This strategy is usually employed in some occasion, such as in emergency situation,
unequal power relationship, and task oriented activities. For example: Give me a pen Yule, 1996: 63
b. Positive Politiness
Positive politeness provides an attempt to minimize the damage to the hearer’s face Brown and Levinson, 1987: 101. This strategy is
intended to avoid the conflict and to minimize the social distance between the speaker and the hearer. There are some indication of
positive politeness strategy, such as using in-group indetity makers, offering solidarity through friendship, seeking agreement, avoiding
disagreement, presupposition raise assert common ground, joking, asserting or presuppose speaker’s knowledge, concerning for
hearer’s wants, offering and promising, being optimistic, including both speaker and hearer in the actvity, giving or asking reasons,
assuming or asserting recipocity, giving gifts to hearer goods, sympathy, understanding, cooperation, etc 1987: 102.
For example : How about letting me use your pen? Yule, 1996: 64
c. Negative Politeness
Brown and Levinson 1987: 129 state that negative politeness attends to a person’s negative face needs, which appeals to the
hearer’s desire not to be impeded or put upon and to be left free to act as they want. This strategy is to express respect and
consideration. There are some indication of negative politeness strategy, such as being conventionally indirect, questioning, hedge,
being pesimistic, minimizing the imposition or friction, formality in language use, apoligizing, giving deference and respect 1987:
130. For example: Could you lend me your pen? Yule, 1996: 64
d. Off-record Strategy
A communicative act is done by using off record strategy if it is not possible to attribute only one clear intention act Brown and
Levinson, 1987. When the speaker uses this strategy, she he wants to avoid the responsibility for doing FTA. As stated by Brown and
Levinson, 1987: 211, this strategy is used when the speaker wants to damage another’s face without any responsibility of doing it, by
leaving it up to the hearers to be interpreted by themselves. For example: Uh, I forgot my pen. Yule, 1996: 63
C. Theoretical Framework
The aim of this study is to know the strategy of requesting speech act in the Frozen and the types of politeness strategy applied in that movie. Some
applicable theories are used in this research to support the process of the data analysis.
First, researcher uses Searle’s theory about classification speech act
especially directive requesting speech act. And then, researcher uses Trosborg
’s theory in Searle’s statement about speaker based-condition and hearer oriented-condition to solve the problem one. From that theory,
researcher can classify the strategies is applied in Frozen. Last, the researcher uses Brown and Levinson
’s theory about politeness strategy to solve last problem that is the type of politeness strategy that applied
in the movie. The end of this process produces the classification of speaker- based condition and hearer-oriented condition also politeness strategy applied
in Frozen. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
18
CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY
Research methodology is important to know how research is done scientifically to solve the research problem Kothari, 1990: 8. This research
belongs to descriptive qualitative study. It means that this research uses descriptive method which emphasis on describing the data used in the research. In
conducting the research, the researcher only examines the data and it is not propose any hypothesis as it started from a phenomenon. In qualitative research,
the data can be in the form of words, sentences, and terminology. Milles and Huberman 1984: 21 state that the qualitative research is essentially an
investigating process: someone investigates a kind of social phenomenon by contrasting, comparing, replicating, cataloging, or classifying the object. This
research does not include any calculation or enumeration, since the data produced are in the form of word. It is like what is stated by Bogdan and Taylor in
Moleong, 2000: 3 that qualitative research is a research that produces descriptive data consisting of written and spoken words and also behavior.
In this research, the researcher finds the phenomena which are in the form of subtitle of original movie script Frozen. There are some utterances to be
analyzed. Therefore, the researcher is interested in conducting a research to analyze request speech act of the subtitle.