students’ progress after using the model, and the usefulness of the modelling for each topic. To ease the data presentation and analysis, the researcher divided the
data presentation and analysis into 4 categories; the students’ responses on previous experiences and the class activities using the model, on the model used,
on the students’ progress after using the model, and on the usefulness of the model for each topic.
a. Previous Experience and Class Activities Using the Model
There were 5 items related to the students’ previous experience and the class activities using the model. The researcher added 3 items related to students’ self-
concept and students’ perceptions of ability. Table 4.1 shows the percentages of the students’ responses on the questionnaire.
Table 4.1 Table of Data on Students’ Responses on Previous Experience and Class Activities Using the Model
N X1
X2 X3
X4 X1
X2 X3
X4
є
M 1 4 16 7 4 12.9032 51.6129 22.5806 12.9032 73 2.354839
2 0 3 21 7 0 9.6774 67.7419 22.5806 97 3.129032
3 0 5 18 8 0 16.129 58.0645 25.8065 96 3.096774
4 0 2 17 12 0 6.4516 54.8387 38.7097 103 3.322581
5 5 13 8 5 16.129 41.9355 25.8065 16.129 75 2.419355
6 0 4 18 9 0 12.9032 58.0645 29.0323 98 3.16129
7 0 5 18 8 0 16.129 58.0645 25.8065 96 3.096774
8 0 2 20 9 0 6.4516 64.5161 29.0323 100 3.225806
For statement number 1, the students tended to choose the choice number 2 disagree, and the percentage was 51.61. There were 12.90 students who
strongly disagreed with the statement while 22.58 of them agreed and 12.90
of them strongly agreed. The average was 2.65. It means that most of the students have never had the same model in their previous speaking classes. It means that
most of them agree that the model is a new model. It is a positive response toward the model.
The table showed that most students chose 3 agree, the percentage was 67.74. It could be summarized that the students made positive responses in the
speaking class activities. Besides, there were 22.58 students who strongly agreed that they made positive responses in the speaking class activity. There
were 9.68 of them who disagreed with the statement and no student strongly disagreed about the statement. Here, the average was 3.13. It could be interpreted
that the students’ responses to statement number 2 are positive. There were 58.06 students who agreed and 26.81 of them strongly agreed,
no student strongly disagreed and 16.13 of them disagreed with statement number 3. The average was 3.10. It means that they also have positive responses
in the speaking class activities since most of them agree that they are attentive and always involved in the speaking class activities. Hence, the students’ responses
are definitely positive. From the students’ responses to statement number 4, the researcher could
check whether the students perceive the ability in understanding the topic positively or not. The result showed that 54.84 students agreed, 38.71 of them
strongly agreed, 6.45 of them disagreed and no student strongly disagreed with the statement. The average of this item was 3.32. It means that the students’
responses to the statement are positive.
The table showed that 41.94 students disagreed and 16.13 of them strongly disagreed, 25.81 of them agreed, and 16.13 of them strongly
disagreed with statement number 5. In this case, 25.81 students and 16.13 of them never did the other class activities outside the speaking class activities. The
average of this item was 2.42. It means that the students’ responses to statement number 5 are negative.
The result of the students’ responses to statement number 6 showed that no student strongly disagreed and 12.90 students disagreed with the statement.
Meanwhile, 58.06 students agreed and 29.03 of them strongly agreed with the statement. The average was 3.16. It means that most students are always interested
to follow the class activities, pay attention to the model and the teacher. In this case, it could be concluded that the students have positive responses to the model.
For statement number 9, 58.06 students agreed that they were not afraid to ask questions in the speaking class and 32.26 of them strongly agreed with the
statement. Meanwhile, no student strongly disagreed and 9.68 of them disagreed with the statement. The average was 3.23. It could be interpreted that the students
in the speaking class felt free to ask questions in the speaking class. It means that they have positive self-concept in the speaking class. Hence, it is positive
responses of the students in the speaking class. The result showed that no student strongly disagreed and 9.68 of them
disagreed that they felt free to speak up and express their ideas in the speaking class. There were 67.74 of them agreed and 22.58 of them strongly agreed
with the statement. The average was 3.13. It means that in the speaking class almost all of the students feel free to speak up and express their ideas. It could
also be interpreted that the students did not have any problems to speak up and express their ideas in the speaking class. For, they have positive self-concept in
the speaking class. It adds more conviction to this research that the students have positive responses in the speaking class.
From the students’ responses on the eight items above, it can be concluded that the students have positive responses on 7 items, 1 item has a negative
responses. It could be interpreted that the students do not only agree that the model is a new model for them, but they also agree that they have made positive
responses in the speaking class activities. It indicates that the students have good perceptions on the organization and situation of the stimuli which in the research
is the organization and situation of the use of the model as a teaching technique.
b. The Use of the Model in the Speaking Class
