Participants Analysis Transitivity Analysis Realizing Ideational Meaning

Verbiage 3 0,3 Behavioural Behaver 3 0,3 Range 2 0,2 Existential Existent 21 2,09 Relational Attributive Carrier 140 13,92 Attribute 124 12,33 Causative Construction Agent 2 0,2 Total 1006 100 As the table shows above, the total of participants which occur in the students‘ recount texts is 1006 participants, and they are divided into many types of participants. 4.2.2.1 Actor, Goal, Range Actor, goal, and range are the participants of material process. The total participants are 512, and the percentage is about 50,89 in the students‘ recount texts. Actor is the doer of the process; there are 373 actors in the students‘ recount texts, and the percentage is 37,01. Goal is the constituent at whom process is directed; there are 117 goals in the students‘ recount texts, and the percentage is 11,63. Then range is the constituent that specifies the domain of the process. In the material process, the total of range is 22, and the percentage is 2,19. Some examples that related to the participants are: 1 At 06.00 p.m. we went pray in the mosque. cl. 10, text 3 In this clause ‘we’ is the actor, and pray is the range. 2 I tried to catch the fish cl.8, text 7 In this clause ‘I’ is the actor, and ‗the fish‘ is the goal. 3 I have a lunch in a cottage cl. 12, text 7 In this clause ‘I’ is the actor, and a lunch is the range. 4 Last weekend I got a fantastic holiday.cl. 1, text 11 In this clause ‘I’ is the actor, and ‗a fantastic holiday‘ is the goal. 5 There I bought a jacket, bag, clothes.cl. 8, text 12 In this clause ‘I’ is the actor, and ‗a jacket, bag, clothes.‘ is the goal. There are still many examples related to the participants above, but the researcher only took 5 clauses to represent the participants. The examples above shows the participants who are the actors do the process to get the goal or range. 4.2.2.2 Client, Recipient Client and recipient are two participants which may occur in material process clause, they are also called beneficiary. The total beneficiaries are only 3 participant, and the percentage is about 0,3 in the students‘ recount texts. Client is the participant that is the one the service is done for, there is 2 client in the students‘ recount texts, and the percentage is 0,2. And, recipient is the participant that is the one the goods are given to, there are1 recipients in the s tudents‘ recount texts, and the percentage is 0,1. Here are the clauses. 1 Then, I and my family with grandmother walked around in the Marlboro to buy clothes and watches for uncle. cl.8, text 5 2 After that, my big family and I said good bye to my cousinscl.15, text 20 3 Suddenly my friends gave a surprise for me. cl.10, text 28 The clauses above are the examples of beneficiary in material process. In the 1 clause is the example of recipient, and in the 2 and 3 clauses are the examples of client. 4.2.2.3 Senser, Phenomenon Senser and phenomenon are the participants of mental process. The total of mental process participants are 185, and the percentage is about 18,38 in the students‘ recount texts. Senser is the conscious human participants who feel, think or see. There are 95 sensers in the students‘ recount texts, and the percentage is 9,44. Phenomenon is the participant that is thought, felt, or perceived by senser, there are 90 phenomenon in the students‘ recount texts, and the percentage is 8,94. Some examples related to the participants are: 1 I saw two kids sitting on the white sand. cl. 11, text 1 2 I felt very scary cl. 15, text 2 3 I felt happy cl. 16, text 6 4 We enjoyed the meal. cl. 16, text 8 5 we enjoyed a beautiful sunset. cl. 22, text 11 There are still many examples related to the participants above, but the researcher only took 5 clauses to represent the participants. From the examples above, we can see that the sensers are I, and we; and the phenomenon are two kids sitting on the white sand, very scary, happy, the meal, a beautiful sunset. 4.2.2.4 Sayer, Receiver, Verbiage, Target Sayer, receiver, verbiage, and target are the participants of verbal process. The total participants are 14, and the percentage is about 1,39 in the students‘ recount texts. Sayer is the participant responsible for signaling process; there are 7 sayers in the students‘ recount texts, and the percentage is 0,7. Receiver is the one to whom the verbal process is directed; there are 3 receivers in the students‘ recount texts, and the percentage is 0,3. Then, verbiage is a nominalized statement of the verbal process; there are 3 verbiages, and the percentage is 0,3. Target is the participant who one acted upon verbally; there is only 1 target, and the frequency is 0,1. Some examples related to the participants are: 1 Time Monday yesterday, around 15:30 hours list school breaktime, me and my friend called fransisca, the asr. prayer at the mosque.cl. 1, text 9 2 I scream cl. 9, text 11 3 After that, my big family and I said good bye to my cousinscl. 15, text 20 4 in the classroom all of my friends did not talk to me. cl. 7, text 28 5 the beach is called pindangan beach, cl. 16, text 8 There are still many examples related to the participants above, but the researcher only took 5 clauses to represent the participants. From the examples 1, 2, 3, 4 above shows that the sayers are me and my friend, I, my big family and I, and my friends; and the receivers are found in clauses 3, 4, 5, those are my cousins, to me, and the beach; the verbiages are found in clauses 3 and 5, those are good bye and pindangan beach; then the target is found in clause 1, that is fransisca. 4.2.2.5 Behaver, Range Behaver and range are the participants of behavioral process. The total participants are only 5, and the percentage is about 0,5 in the students‘ recount texts. Behaver is the conscious participant in the behavioural process; there are 3 behavers, and the percentage is 0,3. Range is the participant that specifies the domain of the process; there are 2 ranges, and the percentage is 0,2. Some examples related to the participants are: 1 While we watching TV. cl. 12, text 6 2 While I watched sunset cl. 13, text 7 3 We looked many people in the beach. cl. 6, 11 4 We looked many people in the beach. cl. 6, text 16 5 we look in there, cl. 11, text 25 6 we look out the vast ocean. cl. 14, text 26 From the examples above, it can be seen that the behavers are we, and I; and the ranges are TV, sunset, many people, and the vast ocean. 4.2.2.6 Existent Existent is the participants of existential process. The total of existential process participants are 21, and the percentage is about 2,09 in the students‘ recount texts. Existent is the only participant who receives a functional label in the existential process. Some examples related to the participants are: 1 There were many people in the bus. cl. 6, text 6 2 There are passengers, singers, and traders drinks in the bus. cl. 7, text 6 3 There was a reef, fish, white sand and blue water. cl. 4, text 7 4 There were some people in the beach. cl. 8, text 10 There are still many examples related to the participants above, but the researcher only took 4 clauses to represent the participants. From the examples above shows that the existents are many people, passengers, singers, and the tranders, a reef, white sand and blue ater, and some people. 4.2.2.7 Carrier, Attribute Carrier and attribute are the participants of relational attributive process. The total participants are 264, and the percent age is about 26,25 in the students‘ recount texts. Carrier is the noun or nominal group in the relational attributive process; there are 140 carriers in the students‘ recount texts, and the percentage is 13,92. Attribute is the quality, classification, or descriptive of carrier; there are 124 attributes, and the percentage is 12,33. Some examples related to the participants are: 1 There was very beautiful, clean cl.9, text 1 2 It was a great day. cl.3, text 2 3 That ‘s best day ever. cl.25, text 3 4 The driver is handsome and cool. cl. 4, text 4 5 I ‘m so tired. cl. 14, text 5 There are still many examples related to the participants above, but the researcher only took 5 clauses to represent the participants. The examples above show that the carriers are there, it, that, the driver and I; and the attributes are to very beautiful, clean, a great day, best day, handsome and cool, and so tired. 4.2.2.8 Agent Agent is the participants of causative construction. The total of agents are only 2, and the percentage is about 0,2 in the students‘ recount texts. Agent is the participant who causing other participants to carry out the action. Some examples related to the participants are: 1 But it made us feel happy. cl. 24, text 3 2 but it made us feel happy cl. 24, text 4 From the examples above shows that the agents are it. The agent ‘it’ made someone can feel happy. Agent ‘it’ refers to the students‘ experiences that can make the students‘ feel happy.

4.2.3 Circumstances Analysis

In transitivity analysis, the researcher also analyzed the circumstance types which occurred in the students‘ recount texts. They are realized in the table below. Table 4.7 Data Summary of Circumstances Analysis Circumstances Sum of Analyzed Items Percentage Extent 5 1,06 Location 408 86,81 Matter 1 0,21 Manner 22 4,68 Role Cause 19 4,04 Accompaniment 15 3,19 TOTAL 470 100 According to Eggins, there are 7 circumstances in ideational meaning; they are circumstance of extent, location, role, accompaniment, manner, matter, and cause. 4.2.3.1 Circumstance of extent Circumstance of extent expresses duration and spatial distance and is probed by how long? and how far?. As the table shows above, there are 5 circumstances of extent which occurred in the students‘ recount texts, and the frequency is 1,06. The examples related to the circumstance of extent are listed below. 1 There, we stayed for 4 days. cl. 2, text 8 2 The air is very cold there once. cl.5, text 13 3 Fiting coincidence when I was there during the rainy season. cl.6, text 13 4 Very beautiful day it will not be me forget all my life. cl.11, text 16 5 I felt something wrong until the break time. cl.8, text 28 All of the clauses above show about circumstance of extent, the verbs that show the circumstance of extent are for 4 days, once, during the rainy season, all my life, and until the break time. All of them expressed duration by how long?. Most of the students gave information about duration of time how long they did their experiences or actions in the recount texts. 4.2.3.2 Circumstance of location The dominant circumstance that occurs in all of students‘ recount texts are circumstance of location. Circumstance of location expresses temporal and spatial probed by when? and where? As the table shows above, the total circumstance of

Dokumen yang terkait

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY OF THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN WRITING A RECOUNT TEXT AT SMP NEGERI 6 JEMBER IN THE 2013/2014 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 4 16

LEARNER’S STRATEGY IN DEVELOPING WRITING SKILL : A CASE STUDY AT THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMP N 2 BANYUDONO Learner’s Strategy In Developing Writing Skill : A Case Study At The Eighth Grade Of Smp N 2 Banyudono Students In 2016/2017 Academic Year.

0 2 13

LEARNER’S STRATEGY IN DEVELOPING WRITING SKILL : A CASE STUDY AT THE EIGHTH GRADE OF Learner’s Strategy In Developing Writing Skill : A Case Study At The Eighth Grade Of Smp N 2 Banyudono Students In 2016/2017 Academic Year.

0 2 12

INTRODUCTION Learner’s Strategy In Developing Writing Skill : A Case Study At The Eighth Grade Of Smp N 2 Banyudono Students In 2016/2017 Academic Year.

0 2 5

STUDENTS’ DIFFICULTIES IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT AT THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMP MURNI 1 SURAKARTA IN 2014/2015 Students’ Difficulties In Writing Recount Text At The Eighth Grade Of Smp Murni 1 Surakarta In 2014/2015 Academic Year.

0 6 17

ERROR ANALYSIS ON DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS MADE BY THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS AT SMP N 2 COLOMADU Error Analysis Of Descriptive Texts Made By The Eighth Grade Students At SMP N 2 Colomadu In 2014/2015 Academic Year.

0 2 15

ERROR ANALYSIS ON DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS MADE BY THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS AT SMP N 2 COLOMADU Error Analysis Of Descriptive Texts Made By The Eighth Grade Students At SMP N 2 Colomadu In 2014/2015 Academic Year.

0 2 12

ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN USING GRAMMAR IN DESCRIPTIVE TEXT: A CASE STUDY AT EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMPN 1 PRAYA IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2014/2015. - Repository UNRAM

0 0 16

ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ ERRORS IN USING PRONOUN IN ENGLISH COMPOSITION: A CASE STUDY AT THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMPN 1 NARMADA IN ACADEMIC YEAR 20172018

0 0 14

STUDENTS’ DIFFICULTIES IN COMPREHENDING ENGLISH DESCRIPTIVE TEXT: A CASE STUDY AT THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMPN 11 MATARAM IN ACADEMIC YEAR 20172018

0 1 16