Instruments and Data Gathering Technique

28 � � x 100 x = The number of the students based on the degree agreement n = The number of all participants Then, the researcher used content analysis to analyse the results of the interviews, students’ self-reflection sheets, and documents. According to Ary, Jacobs, and Sorensen 2010, the focus of content analysis is on analyzing and interpreting recorded materials to have deeper understanding about human behaviour. The recorded materials can be in the form of public records, textbooks, letters, films, tapes, diaries, themes, reports, and other documents. As the researcher explained before, this research used some interviews, self- reflection sheets, and documents. In analyzing the results of those three instruments, the researcher focused on the content of the results. Since the results of the interview were in the form of voice records, the researcher made a transcript of each voice record. For the transcript of the lecturer’s interview, the researcher made a table to ease the researcher in analyzing the lecturers’ answers. Then, the researcher made a table for the students’ interview results. This helped the researcher to see and compare the answers of the students. In analyzing the content of the interviews, self-reflection sheets, and documents, the researcher focused on the main idea of each answer. The main ideas which were obtained were based on the questionnaire and related to theories used by the researcher. It is supported by Wahyuni 2012 that “a summative content analysis involves counting and comparisons, usually of keywords or content, followed by the interpretatio n of the underlying context.” 29

F. Research Procedure

In this part, the researcher presents the research procedure of conducting the research. The procedure is presented as follows:  Consulting the topic to the advisor  Asking the advisor whether the topic was accepted or not  Asking for permission to the lecturer of Interpreting class B to conduct research in her class  Arranging the questionnaire  Consulting the questionnaire to the advisor  Doing the first data gathering using a questionnaire at the end of the class in the last meeting of Interpreting class B  Explaining the topic of the research  Distributing the questionnaire to the twenty five students in the class  Collecting all sheets of the questionnaire  Analysing the results of the questionnaire  Conducting questions of the interview for lecturer and students  Consulting the questions to the advisor  Contacting the lecturer to have an interview with her  Doing an interview with the lecturer  Confirming the lecturer’s statements orally  Consulting six chosen students as the participants of the interview to the lecturer  Contacting all chosen participants  Confirming their willingness as participants 30  Doing some interviews in three different days  Explaining the participants about the interview  Asking some questions to the participants  Taking some notes while listening to the participants’ answers  Recording the interview  Confirming the participants’ statements  Analysing the data

G. Triangulation of Data Analysis

This research was a mixed-method research. It relied on quantitative and qualitative data instruments in gathering the data. In this case, the researcher was the member of Interpreting class B which was studied by the researcher. Therefore, the data triangulation was achieved by following this procedure. First, the researcher investigated deep understanding of the theoretical framework of this research. The theoretical framework was conducted by using some theories related to this research. Second, empirical data were obtained through the questionnaire, interview, self-reflection, and document analysis. From the questionnaire, the researcher depicted the general phenomenon in the class. Third, the results were confirmed to the lecturer to meet further information. It was also confirmed to the students. Then, the researcher could see deeper ideas and information from two sides; the lecturer and the students. Moreover, the results of the interview with the student were supported by self-reflection and documents. Last, the researcher conducted data analysis independently based on the theoretical 31 framework and findings which were obtained. It was presented to the thesis advisor to obtain constructive enhancement of the analysis.