IJFMT April June 2018 2

Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine Toxicology

EDITOR Prof. R K Sharma

  Formerly at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi E-mail: editor.ijfmtgmail.com

  INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD

  NATIONAL EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD

  1.

  1. Dr Nuwadatta Subedi (In Charge) Dept of Forensic Med and

  Prof. Shashidhar C Mestri (Professor) Forensic Medicine Toxicology, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences,

  Toxicology College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur, Nepal

  2. Dr. Birendra Kumar Mandal (In charge) Forensic Medicine and

  Palayanoor Kanchipuram Distric, Tamil Nadu

  Toxicology, Chitwan Medical College, Bharatpur, Nepal

  2. Dr. Madhuri Gawande (Professor) Department of Oral Pathology

  3. Dr. Sarathchandra Kodikara (Senior Lecturer) Forensic Medicine,

  and Microbiology, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Sawangi,

  Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University

  Wardha.

  of Peradeniya,Sri Lanka

  3. Dr. T.K.K. Naidu (Prof Head) Dept of Forensic Medicine, Prathima

  4. Prof. Elisabetta Bertol (Full Professor) Forensic Toxicology at

  Institute of Medical Sciences, Karimnagar, A.P.

  the University of Florence, Italy

  4. Dr. Shalini Gupta (Head) Faculty of Dental Sciences, King George

  5. Babak Mostafazadeh (Associate Professor) Department of

  Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh

  Forensic Medicine Toxicology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran-Iran

  5. Dr. Pratik Patel (Professor Head) Forensic Medicine Dept, Smt NHL Mun Med College, Ahmedabad

  6.

  6. Dr. Mokhtar Ahmed Alhrani (Specialist) Forensic Medicine

  Devinder Singh (Professor) Department of Zoology Environmental Sciences, Punjabi University, Patiala

  Clinical Toxicology, Director of Forensic Medicine Unit, Attorney

  General’s Office, Sana’a, Yemen

  7.

  Dr. Rahul Pathak (Lecturer) Forensic Science, Dept of Life 7.

  Dr. Pankaj Datta (Principal Head) Department of Prosthodontics,

  Sciences Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom

  Inderprasth Dental College Hospital, Ghaziabad

  8.

  Dr. Mahindra Nagar (Head) Department of Anatomy, University

  8.

  Dr. Hareesh (Professor Head) Forensic Medicine, Ayder Referral

  College of Medical Science Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi

  Hospital,College of Health Sciences,Mekelle University, Mekelle Ethiopia East Africa

  9. Dr. D Harish (Professor Head) Dept. Forensic Medicine Toxicology, Government Medical College Hospital, Sector 32,

  SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE

  Chandigarh

  1. Pradeep Bokariya (Assistant Professor) Anatomy Dept.

  10. Dr. Dayanand G Gannur (Professor) Department of Forensic

  Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha,

  Medicine Toxicology, Shri B M Patil Medical College, Hospital

  Maharashtra

  Research centre, Bijapur-586101, Karnataka

  2. Dr Anil Rahule (Associate Professor) Dept of Anatomy, Govt

  11. Dr. Alok Kumar (Additional Professor Head) Department of

  Medical College Nagpur

  Forensic Medicine Toxicology, UP Rural Institute of Medical

  3.

  Sciences and Research, Saifai, Etawah. -206130 (U.P.), India.

  MNR Medical College, Hyderabad

  12. Prof. SK Dhattarwal, Forensic Medicine, PGIMS, Rohtak,

  4. Dr Vandana Mudda (Awati) (Associate Prof) Dept of FMT,

  Haryana

  M.R.Medical College,Gulbarga, Karnataka,

  13. Prof. N K Aggrawal (Head) Forensic Medicine, UCMS, Delhi

  5. Dr. Lav Kesharwani (Asst.Prof.) School of Forensic Science, Sam

  14. Dr. Virender Kumar Chhoker (Professor) Forensic Medicine and

  Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture Technology Sciences,

  Toxicology, Santosh Medical College, Ghaziabad, UP

  Allahabad U.P, 6. Dr. NIshat Ahmed Sheikh (Associate Professor) Forensic

  Print-ISSN:0973-9122 Electronic - ISSn: 0973-9130

  Medicine, KIMS Narketpally, Andhra Pradesh

  Frequency: Quarterly, © All Rights reserved The views and opinions expressed are of the

  7. Dr K. Srinivasulu (Associate Professor) Dept of Forensic

  authors and not of the Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine Toxicology. Indian Journal of

  Medicine Toxicology, Mediciti Institute of Medical sciences,

  Forensic Medicine Toxicology does not guarantee directly or indirectly the quality or efficacy

  Ghanpur, MEDCHAL Ranga Reddy. Dist.AP_501401.

  of any products or service featured in the advertisement in the journal, which are purely

  8. Dr. Mukesh Sharma (Senior Scientific Officer) Physics Division,

  commercial.

  State Forensic Science Laboratory, Jaipur, Rajasthan 9. Dr. Amarantha Donna Ropmay (Associate Professor)

  Website: www.ijfmt.com

  NEIGRIHMS, Shillong 10. Dr Basappa S. Hugar (Associate Professor) Forensic Medicine,

  Editor

  M.S. Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore

  Dr. R.K. Sharma

  11. Dr. Anu Sharma (Associate Prof) Dept of Anatomy, DMCH,

  Institute of Medico-legal Publications

  Ludhiana (PB)

  4 th Floor, Statesman House Building, Barakhamba Road, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110 001

  Printed, published and owned by

  “Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine Toxicology” is peer reviewed

  six monthly journal. It deals with Forensic Medicine, Forensic Science, Toxicology, DNA

  Dr. R.K. Sharma

  fingerprinting, sexual medicine and environment medicine. It has been assigned International

  Institute of Medico-legal Publications

  standard serial No. p-0973-9122 and e- 0973-9130. The Journal has been assigned RNI

  4 th Floor, Statesman House Building, Barakhamba Road,

  No. DELENG200821789. The journal is indexed with Index Copernicus (Poland) and is

  Connaught Place, New Delhi-110 001

  covered by EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database). The journal is also abstracted in Chemical Abstracts (CAS) database (USA. The journal is also covered by EBSCO (USA) database.

  Published at

  The Journal is now part of UGC, DST and CSIR Consortia. It is now offical publication of

  Institute of Medico-legal Publications

  Indian Association of Medico-Legal Experts (Regd.).

  DOI Number: 10.59580973-9130.2018.00062.2

Socio-demographic Profile of Pattern of Solvent Abuse among Street Children in Bengaluru

Murali Mohan MC 1 , Yadukul s 2 , Satish KV 3

  1 Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine Toxicology, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar,

  2 Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine Toxicology, Chamarajanagar Institute of Medical

  Sciences, Chamarajanagar, 3 Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine Toxicology, Bangalore Medical

  College Research Institute, Bengaluru

ABSTRACT

  Background: Solvent use among children and adolescents is a major concern across the world. Solvents are easily available, convenient to use, relatively inexpensive, and legal for certain uses; and all these factors promote their use and also abuse at later stages in youngsters.

  Objectives:

  a) To study the socio-demographic pattern of solvent abuse.

  b) To describe the patterns and consequences of solvent abuse.

  c) To design a better preventive and rehabilitative approach to help these children. Methodology: The present observational study was conducted in the Department of Forensic Medicine

  Toxicology, Bangalore Medical College Research Institute, Bengaluru during the study period of 2 years from 1 st Aug 2010 till 31st Aug 2012. The study was done on the street children, who stay in the areas of Railway Station, Kalasipalya and Shivajinagar of Bangalore City; who were interviewed based on a predesigned proforma relating to solvent abuse and the data were analyzed.Totally 200 street children with history of solvent abuse were enrolled into the study.

  Results: In the present study, Solvent abuse was common among male children in the age group of 13- 15yrs. Majority of the children were coolie by occupation, started working by the age of 10 years most of them took shelter on foot path. Tobacco was the most common other substance of abuse followed by Gutka, Alcohol Ganja.

  Conclusion: This study has identified key issues requiring urgent public health action. The widespread use of solvents is particularly concerning due to easy, cheap availability and unrestricted sales to minors, as well

  as detrimental health effects of the same should be a major concern for law and policy makers. It is likely that the use of solvents could impact upon the ability of street children to be integrated into society and resume a normal social life.

  Keywords: Solvent; Abuse; Streetchildren; Bengaluru

INTRODUCTION

  Corresponding author: Dr. Yadukul s

  Streets throughout the world are home to millions

  Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine

  of children who endure hardships and injustices while

  Toxicology, Chamarajanagar Institute of Medical

  struggling to survive 1 . The United Nations Children’s

  Sciences, Chamarajanagar, (+91 9986510681)

  Emergency Fund (UNICEF) defines children living

  Email: yadukul.mysurugmail.com

  and working on the street in three categories: ‘children

  Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine Toxicology, April-June 2018, Vol. 12, No. 2 2

  of the street’,‘children on the street’ and ‘children

  RESULTS OBSERVATION

  from street families’ 2 . Children on the street spend

  In the present study, 93.5 were male and 6.5

  a proportion of their time on the street, working to

  were female. Among the different age groups (Table

  provide an economic contribution to their family, but

  1), it was observed that the highest numbers of children

  often return home at night, maintaining familial ties.

  were aged 14 years (31.5) and the lowest were aged

  Children of the streetboth work and sleep on the streets

  11 years (1.5). It was observed that, most of the street

  and have an absence of regular contact with family

  children lived (Table 2) in the premises of Gandhinagar

  members. Children from street families live with their families in the street 2

  (34); followed by Shivaji nagar(16), K R Market

  (14) Magadi (6.5). It is noted that majority of

  Although street-involved children and youth

  the children were coolie (39) by occupation (Table

  (SICY) are a world-wide phenomenon, the dynamics

  3) followed by begging (28.5), rag picking (24),

  that drive children to the streets are quite diverse and

  hotel cleaner (6) and parking toll collector (2.5).

  vary between high-income and low to middle-income

  Majority of the street children were from Karnataka

  countries 3 . While youth in developed countries usually

  (91), followed by Tamil Nadu (6.5) and Andhra

  become street-involved due to familial conflict and

  Pradesh (2.5). In 64.5 of children, the parents were

  child abuse 4 , children in resource-constrained settings

  uneducated (illiterates).

  (RCS) succumb to street life due to abject poverty, child abuse, neglect and familial dysfunction, death of

  Table 1: Age wise distribution of cases

  one or both parents, warand socio-cultural and religious

  number of

  beliefs . Additionally, the solvent use habits adopted

  by SICY in RCS are often divergent from those of their

  counterparts in high income countries 10 . Youth in street

  circumstances in high-income settings engage in using

  injection drugs and other substances that are not used

  commonly among children and youth on the streets in

  RCS 10-12 .

  There are an estimated 100 million street children

  worldwide of which 30 million are in Asia and 10

  million in Africa. India alone has an estimated number

  Table 2: Place of Living Native Place

  of 414,700 street children in its major cities. It is found that about 80,000 street children live in and around

  Total number

  Bengaluru. Roughly about 60 new children land percentage up on bus stands and railway stations every day in

  sl no. Place

  of cases

  1 Gandhi nagar

  Bengaluru 13 .

  2 Shivaji nagar

  3 K.R. Market

  MetHoDooGY

  The present observational study was conducted in

  6 Srirampura

  the Department of Forensic Medicine Toxicology,

  7 Hosur

  Bangalore Medical College Research Institute,

  8 Ananthpur

  Bengaluru during the study period of 2 years from 1 st 9 Sunkada katte

  Aug 2010 till 31st Aug 2012. The study was done on the

  10 Kamakshipalya

  13 street children who stay in the areas of Railway Station, 6.5

  11 Magadi

  12 K.G. Halli

  Kalasipalya and Shivajinagar of Bangalore City, who

  13 Whitefield

  were interviewed based on a predesigned proforma

  14 Banashankari

  relating to solvent abuse and the data were analyzed.

  15 Wilson garden

  Totally 200 street children with history of solvent abuse

  16 Bannerghatta

  were enrolled into the study.

  17 Other places

  3 Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine Toxicology, April-June 2018, Vol. 12, No. 2

  Table 3: Type of Work Occupation among

  Table 6: Reason for Using Solvent:

  Children:

  Reason For Using

  sl no.

  number Percentage

  sl

  Work

  number of

  1. Friends peer pressure 141 70.5

  Parking Toll

  3. For Kick

  4. To Sleep

  3. Hotel Cleaner

DISCUSSION

  4. Rag Picker

  Benegalet al 13 in a similar study in Bangalore

  5. Begging

  57 28.5 found that 69 of these children preferred to be on the streets and 24 hailed from economically poor

  In this study, we found out that majority of the

  families. 81.9 of these children were male and earned

  children took shelter (Table 4) on foot path (45),

  up to 150 rupees a day. Majority of them took to solvent

  followed by shelter home (27), railway station (14),

  abuse to feel happy, and felt it as form of relief from

  market (7) and home (7). It was interesting to note

  various problems. They started with tobacco, solvents

  that, in 41 of cases, children started to work from an

  and proceeded to use of cannabis and alcohol. Pagore et

  early age of 10years. Tobacco (59.5) was the most

  al 14 in a study of 115 children in Delhi found that 68.7

  common other substance of abuse (Table 5), followed

  of the children faced some form of abuse at home and

  by Gutka (19), Alcohol (19), Ganja (2.5) and

  57.4 took to substance abuse on the streets. Earliest

  the other major part did not abuse any other substance

  age to begin substance abuse was 5.5 years compared

  (32.5). Influence of friends (70.5) was the most

  to 11 years as in our study. Poonam et al 15 in a study in

  common reason for solvent abuse (Table 6) reported by

  Mumbai of 217 children found that 44.23 of them on

  most of the children followed by curiosity (15), for

  the streets reported substance abuse. 11.3 years was the

  kick (12) and for sleeping (2).

  mean age to start use of these solvents. Males (63.54)

  Table 4: Shelter Place

  had higher rate of solvent abuse compared to females, which is similar to our study. According to them

  sl no

  Shelter Place

  number

  Percentage

  39.34 used cannabis, 37.7 used alcohol and 32.8

  1 Foot Path

  90 45 took to solvent abuse. 70.5 of the children said they

  54 27 started use of drugs out of inquisitiveness.

  2 Shelter Home

  3 Railway Station

  28 14 Sharma et al 16 in a study of 487 children in Delhi

  4 Home

  14 7 showed that 25.7 of them addicted to tobacco. 17

  14 7 used alcohol, 15.8 used solvents and 26.3 were involved in poly substance abuse. Peer pressure was

  5 Market

  Table 5: Other Substances of Abuse Reported:

  considered primarily responsible for driving these children to drug abuse. Immaculate Mary et al 17

  sl

  Other Substances of

  number

  Percentage

  suggests that 32.1 of children below 18 years of

  no

  Abuse Reported:

  age take to sovent abuse on the street. They usually

  1. Tobacco

  59.5 start with tobacco and proceed to solvents. Cannabis

  2. Gutka

  38 19 is usually started by bigger children above 13 years of

  3. Alcohol

  38 19 age. Though lots of laws are existent to prevent use of

  4. Ganja

  5 2.5 dangerous solvents by children these are not effective

  5. Fevi Bond

  6 3 enough in controlling the problem. Khan et al 18 in a

  65 32.5 study of street children in Pakistan claimed that 90 of the children have taken to glue sniffing as it is cheap

  6. None

  and easily available without any strict regulations. 40

  Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine Toxicology, April-June 2018, Vol. 12, No. 2 4

  of these children suffer from some form of ill health due

  31: 965–71.

  to this habit. Similar conditions have been reported in

  4. Hadland SE, Kerr T, Li K, MontanerJS,Wood

  various cities of Nepal, East Timor, Vietnam, Hongkong

  E. Access to drug and alcohol treatment among

  etc. that 65.9 of these children live on the street with

  a cohort of streetinvolved youth. Drug Alcohol

  their families and 66.8 have some form of physical

  Depend 2009; 101: 1–7.

  abuse .

  5. Olley BO. Social and health behaviors in youth

  These children face a variety of personal problems

  of the streets of Ibadan, Nigeria. Child Abuse

  at their homes and work place. They are exposed to a

  Negl2006; 30: 271–82.

  variety of risk factors normally considered for substance

  6. Ayaya SO, Esamai FO. Health problems of street

  abuse. Peer pressure, work stress, easy availability of

  children in Eldoret, Kenya. East Afr Med J 2001;

  drugs, rebelliousness and development of anti social

  78: 624–9.

  behavior on the streets push these children into solvent

  7. Abdelgalil S, Gurgel RG, Theobald S, Cuevas

  and other substance abuse.

  LE. Household and family characteristics of street

  CONCLUSION

  children in Aracaju, Brazil. Arch Dis Child 2004;

  89: 817–20.

  This study has identified key issues requiring

  8. Morakinyo J, Odejide AO. A community based

  urgent public health action. The widespread use of

  study of patterns of psychoactive substance use

  solvents is particularly concerning due to easy, cheap

  among street children in a local government area

  availability and unrestricted sales to minors, as well

  of Nigeria. Drug Alcohol Depend 2003; 71: 109–

  as detrimental health effects of the same should be a

  major concern for law and policymakers. It is likely that the use of solvents could impact upon the ability of

  9. Njord L, Merrill RM., Njord R., Lindsay R.,

  street children to be integrated into society and resume

  Pachano JD. Drug use among street children and

  a normal social life. Additional effort and collaboration

  non-street children in the Philippines. Asia Pac J

  between policy makers, communities and researchers is

  Public Health 2010; 22: 203–11.

  essential to understand and implement mechanisms to

  10. De Carvalho FT, Neiva-Silva L, Ramos MC,

  reduce the harms associated with using inhalants, while

  Evans J, Koller SH., Piccinini CA. et al. Sexual

  also preventing and stopping solvent use among this

  and drug use risk behaviors among children and

  vulnerable population.

  youth in street circumstances in Porto Alegre, Brazil. AIDS Behav2006; 4: S57–66.

  Ethical Clearance: Taken from Ethics Committee from Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute,

  11. Roy E, Boudreau JF, Leclerc P, Boivin JF, Godin

  Bengaluru.

  G. Trends in injection drug use behaviors over 10 years among street youth. Drug Alcohol Depend

  Source of Funding: Self

  2007; 89: 170–5.7

  Conflict of InteresT: Nil

  12. Hadland SE, Marshall BDL, Kerr T, Zhang R., MontanerJS, Wood EA. Comparison of drug use

  REFERENCE

  and risk behavior profiles among younger and older street youth. Subst Use Misuse 2011; 46:

  1. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). The

  1486–94.

  State of the World’s Children 2012: Children in an UrbanWorld. NewYork: UNICEF; 2012.

  13. Benegal V, Kulbhusan, Seshadri S, Karott M. Drug abuse among street children in Bangalore.

  2. World Health Organization (WHO). Working

  A project in Collaboration between NIMHANS,

  With Street Children: Module 1. A Profile of

  Bangalore and the Bangalore Forum for street and

  Street Children. In: Dependence. Geneva: World

  working children, Monograph funded by CRY.

  Health Organization; 2000.

  3. Le Roux J. The worldwide phenomenon of street

  14. Pagare D, Meena G S, Singh M M, Saha R. Risk

  children: conceptual analysis. Adolescence 1996;

  Factors of Substance Use Among Street Children

  5 Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine Toxicology, April-June 2018, Vol. 12, No. 2

  from Delhi. INDIAN PEDIATRICS 2004 Mar;

  Meaningful Achievement of Millennium

  41: 221-225.

  Development Goals. URL:http:www.ihsnet.

  15. Poonam R.Naik, Seema S. BansodeGokhe,

  org.inIHSPresentations Protecting Children

  RatnendraR.Shinde, AbhayS.Nirgude. Street

  FromSubstanceAbuse08Jan09.pdf.

  children of Mumbai: Demographic profile and

  18. Khan A S, A Situational Analysis of the

  substance abuse. Biomedical Research 2011;

  Street Child phenomenon in Pakistan: A

  22(4): 495-498.

  Literature Review. University College London.

  16. Sharma S, Lal R. Volatile Substance Misuse

  URL:

  http:cfsc.trunky.netdownload.

  Among Street Children in India: A Preliminary

  asp?doc=Publicationsid=405.

  Report. Substance Use Misuse 2011; 46:46–49.

  19. Street Children Statistics. Consortium for street

  children.URL:http:www.streetchildren.org.

  from Substance Abuse: A Critical Need for

  uk_...Street_Children_Stats_FINAL.pdf.

  DOI Number: 10.59580973-9130.2018.00063.4

  A Retrospective Analysis of Mandibular Fractures: An Autopsy Study - 2012-2016

Ajay Kumar T S 1 , Deepa C 2

  1 Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology,

  2 Assistant Professor, Department of Dentistry, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar

ABSTRACT

  Background and objectives: Mandibular fracture, also known as fracture of the jaw, is one of the most commonly fractured facial bones and the most commonly fractured sites are the body of the mandible. The cause of the injury may be road traffic accidents, assault, falls, industrial injuries or sports injuries but the relative number of each varies considerably between countries and areas. This study intends to evaluate the age, gender distribution, the cause and anatomical distribution of mandibular fractures among autopsied cases.

  Method: A retrospective study was conducted at Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar from 2012 to 2016 and a total of 72 cases were studied.

  Results: Out of 72 (100) cases, the males 54 (75) outnumbered females with 18 (25) cases. 45.1 of fractured cases were seen in the age group of 21 – 30 years. Road Traffic Accidents 40 (55.6) was the cause of mandibular fractures in majority of the subjects. The most common site of mandibular fracture was body of mandible with 28 (38.8) cases.

  Conclusion and interpretation: The results could be useful in interpreting the pattern of mandibular fractures among autopsied cases. Since the high frequency of mandibular fractures are due to RTA, the various preventive measures can be employed to minimize the sequelae of mandibular fractures like creating awareness among public about safety measures.

  Keywords: Mandibular fractures, Road Traffic Accidents, Autopsy, Body of mandible.

  INTRODUCTION

  Accidents (RTA) are now responsible for an equal share of the incidence of such injuries. 2 In terms of

  Mandibular fracture, also known as fracture of the

  violence, young males are most at risk with alcohol an

  jaw, is a break through the mandibular bone.

  aggravating factor. Women and children are much less

  It was first described by Egyptian Papyrus in 3 at risk but can be from domestic violence. The relative

  1650 BC. 1 Given its prominent anatomic location;

  number of each varies considerably between countries

  the mandible is one of the most commonly fractured

  and areas and they can be usually attributed to cultural,

  facial bones. Before the invention of the automobile,

  social, environmental and economic factors. 4

  mandibular fractures were most often caused by assault

  The most commonly fractured sites are the body of

  or other blunt trauma like falls, industrial injuries

  the mandible, condyle, angle, symphysis, ramus and the

  or sports injuries to the jaw. However, Road Traffic

  coronoid process. Trauma to one side often produces an ipsilateral body fracture and a contralateral subcondylar

  Corresponding author:

  fracture. A heavy blow to the symphysis produces

  Dr. Deepa C

  a symphyseal fracture and bilateral subcondylar

  Assistant Professor, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College,

  fractures. 3

  Kolar. E-mail: drdeepashekargmail.com

  7 Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine Toxicology, April-June 2018, Vol. 12, No. 2

  The fracture site depends upon the mechanism

  Table 2. Distribution of Mandibular fracture

  of injury, magnitude and direction of impact force,

  cases according to Etiology

  prominence of the mandible and anatomy of site. 4 The

  aim of the present study was to assess age and gender

  Etiology

  Male

  Female number of Cases

  distribution, etiology and anatomic distribution of mandibular fractures among autopsied cases.

  RTA

  MATERIALS AND METhOD

  Fall

  This retrospective study was carried out at Sri

  01 04 Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar from 1 05 (6.9) January 2012 to 31 st December 2016 comprising all cases

  which were autopsied in the Department of Forensic Medicine.

  In this study, the demographic variables such as age

  and gender, etiology and the site of mandibular fractures 72 (100) were noted. The medico-legal records were also referred

  Road Traffic Accidents 40 (55.6) was the cause

  for additional information.

  of mandibular fractures in majority of the subjects,

  The data obtained was recorded in the pre-designed

  followed by Fall with 23 (31.9) cases.

  and pre-tested proforma, which comprised relevant data and analyzed.

  Table 3. Distribution of Mandibular fracture cases according to Anatomical site

RESULTS

  Anatomical Site

  number of

  A total of 72 cases presenting with mandibular

  Cases

  fractures of 1423 number of autopsied cases during

  Para symphysis

  2012 to 2016 in the Department of Forensic Medicine

  were studied. 02 (2.8)

  symphysis

  Body of Mandible

  Table 1. Distribution of Mandibular fracture

  cases according to age and sex 08 (11.2)

  number of Cases

  (in years)

  More than one site

  The most common site of mandibular fracture was body of mandible with 28 (38.8) cases, followed by

  fracture of mandible with more than one sites with 13

  (18.1) cases. The fracture of ramus and coronoid were the least common sites with 01 (1.4) cases each.

  Out of 72 (100) cases, 54 (75) were males and

DISCUSSION

  18 (25) were females. The maximum numbers of fractured cases 39 (45.1) were seen in the age group of

  The mandible is the only mobile bone of the facial

  21 – 30 years. More than 23 rd of the cases were between

  skeleton, and there has been significant increase in the

  21 – 40 years.

  number of cases in the recent years. It is a membranous bone and is more commonly fractured than the other

  Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine Toxicology, April-June 2018, Vol. 12, No. 2 8

  bones of the face. Mandibular fractures occur twice

  The difference in the main cause of injury is largely

  as often as midline fractures. The energy required to

  dependent on the cities where studied were conducted,

  fracture it being the order of 44.6 – 74.4 kgm, which is

  as well as, the population. High incidence of RTA in our

  about the same as the zygoma and about half that for the

  study may be attributed to reckless driving, insufficient

  frontal bone. It is four times as much force is required to

  helmet and seatbelt usage and the availability of fracture maxilla. 5 motorcycle for the young generation and consumption of alcohol while drivingriding.

  In this study, the males 54 case (75) outnumbered the females with 18 cases (25) and the male to female

  With respect to the anatomical site, the commonest

  ratio being 3:1. Our results are consistent with the study

  fracture region was the body of mandible with 28 cases

  conducted by Kamlai U et al, 6 Ansari et al, 7 Kanasakar

  (39.8), followed by more than one sites 13 cases et al, 4 adi et al, Shapiro et al. 8 (18.1), parasymphysis with 12 cases (16.7). Similar

  results were reported by Brook IM et al 19 and Olson RA

  The male dominance may be due to the paternalistic

  et al 20 .

  nature of our society where males keep themselves most of the time outdoors and lead a more active life.

  The anatomic distribution and incidence of mandibular fracture are widely variable. The frequently

  It was also observed that 54.1 of the mandibular

  fractured site varied from author to author. Chuong R et

  fractures occurred in the age group of 21-30 years. More

  al opined symphysis as most frequent, Dongas P et al 18

  than 23 rd

  of the cases were between 21 – 40 years. The

  and Ogundare BO et al 22 opined angle as commonest,

  least number of cases were seen in the age group less

  Kansarkar et al, 4 Vyas A et al, 12 Natu SS 5 reported

  than 20 years and more than 40 years with 06 cases

  parasymphysis the commonly fractured site.

  (8.4) and 08 cases (11.2) respectively.

CONCLUSION

  Similar findings were noted in the studies conducted

  by Abbas et al 9 and Kansakar et al, 4 but the study

  This study helps to interpret the pattern of

  conducted by Shapiro et al 8 reported 34.1 years as mean

  mandibular fractures among autopsied cases. The

  age. This can be explained by the fact that at young age,

  mandibular fractures were more common in males

  people are more mobile, socially active, in business,

  (75) than females (25), with highest number of

  sports and high speed transportation, inter personal

  cases (45.1) were seen in the age group of 21 – 30

  violence, alcohol abuse and so forth.

  years. More than 23 rd of the cases were between 21 – 40 years. RTA was the commonest cause for mandibular

  The lower frequency of mandible fracture is seen

  fractures with (55.6) followed by fall (31.9). The

  at very young age which can be due to high elasticity

  body of the mandible was the commonest fractured

  of bone, poor pneumatization, thick surrounding

  site (38.8), followed by more than one site (18.1),

  adipose tissue and internal stabilization by unerupted

  parasymphysis (16.7).

  teeth within maxilla and mandible. In old age, due to lower physical activities mandibular fractures are least

  Since the high frequency of mandibular fractures

  common.

  are due to RTA, the various preventive measures can

  be employed to minimize the sequelae of mandibular

  Out of 72 cases (100), RTA (55.6) is still

  fractures like creating awareness among public about

  mainstay as the most common cause of mandibular

  safety measures.

  fracture in our population, which is in accordance with

  Shah et al, 10 Al Ahmed et al, 11 Natu SS et al, 5 Vyas

  Conflict of Interest: The authors do not have any

  A et al 12 . In this study, the etiology next to RTA was

  conflict of interest in publishing this article.

  followed by Fall with 23 (31.9) cases.

  source of Funding. -Nil Some of the authors, Jung HW et al, 13 Mittal et al 14

  Ethical Clearance: Institutional ethical clearance

  in their studies opined fall as the commonest cause of

  has been obtained. mandibular fractures and others Ellis E et al, 15 Rashid

  A, 16 Kirk L, 17 Dongas P 18 stated intentional injury or

  violence as the commonest cause.

  9 Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine Toxicology, April-June 2018, Vol. 12, No. 2

  REFERENCES

  12. Vyas A, Mazumdar U, Khan F, Mehra M, Parihar L, Purohit C. A Study of mandibular fractures

  1. Lipton JS. Oral Surgery in Ancient Egypt as

  over a 5 year period of time: A Retrospective

  reflected in the Edwin Smith Papyrus. Bulletin of

  Study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry 2014; 5

  the History of Dentistry 1982; 30: 108.

  (4): 452-455.

  2. William C Soule. Mandibular Fracture Imaging.

  13. Jung HW, Lee BS, Kwon YD, Choi BJ, Lee JW,

  Medscape. [Cited on Jul 01, 2015]. Available

  Lee HW et al. Retrospective clinical study of

  from: http:www. http:emedicine.medscape.

  mandible fractures. Journal of Korean Association

  comarticle391549-overview.

  of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery 2014 Feb; 40 (1):

  3. Mandibular Fractures and Dislocations. Patient.

  21-26.

  Available from: https:patient.infoindoctor

  14. Mittal G, Mittal S. Mandibular fractures at veer

  mandibular-fractures-and-dislocations.

  chandra singh garhwali government medical

  4. Kansakar N, Budhathoki B, Prabhu N, Yadav

  science and research institute, garhwal region,

  A. Pattern and Etiology of Mandibular Fractures

  uttarakhand, India: a retrospective study.

  reported at Nepalgunj Medical College: A

  Annals of medical and health sciences research.

  Prospective Study. Journal of Nepalgunj Medical

  2013;3(2):161-5.

  College 2015; 13 (2): 21-24.

  15. Ellis E, Moos KF and El-Attar A, Ten years of

  5. Natu SS, Pradhan H, Gupta H, Alam S, Gupta

  mandibular fractures: an analysis of 2,137 cases,

  S, Pradhan R et al. An Epidemiological study on

  Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology,

  pattern and Incidence of Mandibular Fractures:

  59(2), 1985, 120-129.

  Plastic Surgery International 2012; (2012, Article

  16. Rashid A, Eyeson J, Haider D, Van Gijn D and

  ID 834364:1-7.

  Fan K, Incidence and patterns of mandibular

  6. Kamali U and Pohchi A. Mandibular fracture

  fractures during a 5-year period in a London

  at HUSM: A 5-year retrospective study. Arch

  teaching hospital, Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,

  Orofac Sci. 2009;4:33-5.

  51(8), 2013, 794-798.

  7. Ansari SR, Khitab U, Qayyum Z, Khattak A.

  17. Kirk L. Fridrich, Gustavo Pena-Velasco and

  Retrospective analysis of 268 cases of fractures

  Robert A.J Olson, Changing Trends with

  of mandible. Pak Oral Dent J 2004; 24:135-8.

  Mandibular Fractures: A review of 1,067 cases, J

  8. A. J. Shapiro, R. M. Johnson, S. F. Miller, and M.

  Oral Maxillofac Surg, 50(6),1992,586-589.

  C. McCarthy, “Facial fractures in a level I trauma

  18. Dongas Pand GM Hall, Mandibular fracture

  centre: the importance of protective devices and

  patterns in Tasmania, Australia, Australian Dental

  alcohol abuse,” Injury, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 353–

  Journal, 47(2), 2002, 131-137.

  19. Brook IM, Wood N. Aetiology and incidence

  9. Abbas I, Ali K, Mirza YB. Spectrum of mandibular

  of facial fractures in adults. Int J Oral

  fractures at tertiary care dental hospital in Lahore.

  Surg. 1983;12:293–8.

  J Ayub Med Coll Abbotabad 2003;15:12-4.

  20. Olson RA, Fonseca RJ, Zeitler DL, Osbon DB.

  10. A. Shah, A. S. Ali, and S. Abdus, “Pattern and

  Fractures of the mandible: A review of 580

  management of mandibular fractures: a study

  cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1982;40:23–8.

  conducted on 264 patients,” Pakistan Oral

  21. Chuong R, Donoff RB, Guralnick WC. A

  Dental Journal, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 103–106,

  retrospective analysis of 327 mandibular

  fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983;41:305–

  11. H. E. A. Ahmed, M. A. Jaber, S. H. Abu Fanas, and

  M. Karas, “The pattern of maxillofacial fractures

  22. Ogundare BO, Bonnick A, Bayley N. Pattern of

  in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates: a review of

  mandibular fractures in an urban major trauma

  230 cases,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral

  center. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:713–8.

  Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 166–170, 2004.

  DOI Number: 10.59580973-9130.2018.00064.6

Infection Control in Orthodontics: A Review

  Mithun K 1 , Ashith M V 2 , harshitha V 3 , Valerie Anithra Pereira 4 , Deesha Kumari 5

  1 Assistant Professor, Department of orthodontics, A.J institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, 2 Reader, Department of Orthodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences Mangalore, 3 Reader, Department of Orthodontics, A.J

  Institute of Dental Sciences. Mangalore, 4 Post graduate Student, Department of Periodontics and Implantology,

  Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, 5 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health Dentistry,

  AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences

ABSTRACT

  Dental care professionals are at an increased risk of cross infection while treating patients.This occupational potential for disease transmission become evident initially when one realises that most human microbial pathogens have been isolated from oral secretions. Because of repeated exposure to micro-organisms in blood and saliva, incidence of certain infectious diseases has been significantly higher among dental professionals than observed for general population.

  Keywords: Infection control, Sterilization, Disinfection, Orthodontic office, Waste management

  INFECTION CONTROL IN

  means

  ORThODONTICS

  1) Direct contact : With patient’s saliva or blood

  Dental care professionals are at an increased risk

  2) Droplet infection: They occur as a result of

  of cross infection while treating patients. Incidence

  sprays, spatter or aerosols from patients mouth.

  of infectious diseases has been significantly higher among dental professionals than observed for general

  3) Indirect contact: involves transfer of

  population. Orthodontists are exposed to a wide variety

  microorganisms from the source (e.g., the patient’s

  of microorganisms in orthodontic office by contaminated

  mouth) to an item.

  instruments, inhalation of aerosols or via percutaneous injuries with archwires, ligature wires, band material

  2. Dental Team to Patient:If the hands of dental

  and other sharp cutting instruments. 1 A study found

  team member contain lesions or other nonintactskin.If

  that orthodontists have the second highest incidence of

  a member of the dental team bleeds on instruments or

  hepatitis B among dental professionals. 2 New materials

  other items that are then used in the patient’s mouth,

  “as received” from the manufacturers are not free from

  cross infection may result.

  bacterial contamination before use in patients. Further

  3. Dental Office to CommunityMicroorganisms

  studies would be required to determine the level of risk

  3 that this poses. from the patient contaminate items that are sent out or

  are transported away from the office. Dental laboratory

  Means of transmission

  technicians have been occupationally infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV). Also, regulated waste that

  1. Patient to Dental Team: It can be by three

  contains infectious agents and is transported from the

  Corresponding author:

  office may contaminate waste handlers if it is not done

  Mithun K

  in proper containers.

  Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, A.J

  Goals of infection control 4

  institute of Dental Sciences, NH-66, Near Kuntikana Road, Kuntikana Mangalore: 575004.

  ADA council on dental therapeutics has

  Mob. +919902355948,

  recommended the following

  Email: dr.mithunknaikgmail.com

  11 Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine Toxicology, April-June 2018, Vol. 12, No. 2

  1. Decrease the number of pathogenic microbes to

  sterilization. Hence cleaning reduces this bio burden to

  the level where normal body resistance mechanisms can

  facilitate sterilization.

  prevent infection .

  - Manual cleaning or hand scrubbing: Time

  2. Break the cycle of infection from dentist,

  consuming and increases the chances of accidental

  assistant patient eliminate cross infection.

  puncture or cuts through direct handling of sharp and pointed instruments. Complete personal protective

  3. Treat all the patient instrument as though

  equipment should be worn. Instruments should be

  they could transmit an infectious disease

  immersed in a detergent and cleaned under running

  4. Protect patient personnel from infection

  water using a soft brush with a long handle.

  protect all dental personnel from threat of malpractice.

  - Ultrasonic cleaning: It is effective, time saving

  Infection control stratergy

  and much more safe than hand scrubbing. A cleaning solution that is specifically recommended by the

  Each clinical practice must have a written infection

  manufacturer for use in ultrasonic cleaner should be

  control policy which must be upgraded with the latest

  used. 5

  recommendations. Infection control strategy involves various steps

  Presoaked instruments contained in the basket should be immersed in the cleaning solution of ultrasonic

  1. Patient screening: A patient with subclinical

  cleaner. The cleaner should be covered and operated for

  infection is a potential source of cross-contamination.

  atleast 6-10 mins. After cleaning, instruments should be

  Therefore, all the patients must be screened by obtaining

  thoroughly rinsed. 6

  the relevant medical and dental history from them and a physician must be consulted if doubt arises

  d. Corrosion control, drying and lubrication: Before subjecting the instruments for sterilization,

  2.Instrument processing:

  the instruments must first be cleaned thoroughly with no debris and dried to reduce chances of corrosion

  a. Containment: During and after each procedure,

  and a rust inhibitor (dip or spray) should be applied.

  every effort should be made to confine all instruments

  Lubrication of instruments with movable parts like

  and devices that have come in contact with the patient

  hinges of orthodontic pliers should be done prior to

  to a well-defined and limited area. Rationale: when

  steam sterilization with a water based lubricant. A

  contaminated instruments are confined to a limited area,

  sodium nitrite rust inhibitor can also be used. Corrosion

  microorganisms are not spread unnecessarily. Utility

  resistance is directly proportional to its chromium

  gloves, protective eyewear and clinic garment should be

  content and inversely proportional to its carbon content.

  worn

  Disinfectants, or detergents with pH greater than 8.5

  b. holding (presoaking): All contaminated

  can disrupt the chromium oxide layer. Blood saliva and

  instruments should be stored in a presoak solution

  debris if not rinsed and directly autoclaved can cause

  immediately after the procedure. Rationale: It is seldom

  pitting corrosion. Chrome plated instruments should be

  possible to clean the instruments used on each patient

  processed separately from stainless steel ones, because

  immediately after the procedure. The debris on such

  of electrolytic action which can carry carbon particles

  instruments may dry, making them more difficult

  from exposed metal of a chrome plated instrument and

  to clean. Recommendations:Use presoak solutions

  deposit them on stainless steel. Chrome plated pliers are

  which consists of detergents or detergents containing

  more resistant to corrosion than stainless steel pliers.

  disinfectants like phenolic compounds. Thepre-soaking

  e. Packaging: Packaging involves organizing the

  solution should be discarded at the end of the day.

  Instruments in functional sets and wrapping them or

  c. Pre-cleaningpre-sterilization: All contaminated

  placing them in sterilization pouches, bags, trays, or

  instruments should be properly cleaned before the

  cassettes. Rationale: Packaging Instruments before

  process of sterilization. Rationale: Blood, Saliva and

  processing through the sterilizer prevents them from

  material on instruments can insulate microorganisms

  environmental contamination after sterilization, and

  from sterilizing agents, and interfere with effective

  maintains sterility during storage or when being

  Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine Toxicology, April-June 2018, Vol. 12, No. 2 12

  distributed to chairside. Recommendations: Only a

  the American Dental association (ADA) and Centers for

  wrapping material that is designed as a sterilization

  Disease control and prevention (CDC) as an acceptable

  wrap for a particular type of sterilizer should be used.

  method of sterilization for the following items that can

  Trays and cassettes are very good options for packaging

  be damaged by heat and or moisture, and those that can

  orthodontic instruments and bands, because they retain

  be cleaned and dried thoroughly.

  instruments during pre-soaking, ultrasonic cleaning, sterilization and storage, and finally for use at chairside.

  MECHANISM: A gas with very high penetrating

  They eliminate the potential risks like puncturing or cuts

  ability. It acts by alkylating the amino, carboxyl,

  while handling sharp contaminated instruments

  sulphhydril groups in protein molecules thus reacts with RNA and DNA.

  Autoclave sterilization must allow steam to

  Recommendation for materials in orthodontics

  penetrate inside it and reach every instrument contained in it and all its surfaces. Requirements of packaging

  a. Impression trays:

  materials: Dry heat sterilization must not insulate items from heat, must not get destroyed by temperature used.

  Aluminium or chrome plated: heat or gas

  Unsaturated chemical vapor sterilization must allow

  sterilization can be used. Custom acrylic trays:

  vapour to precipitate on contents and not react with the

  disinfect by NaOCl or iodophor or to discard. Plastic

  vapour.

  trays: ethylene oxide sterilization or disinfection by NaOCl or iodophor. Alginates are relatively less stable,

  3. Sterilization

  hence ADA recommends disinfection of alginates by

  1)heat sterilization

  immersion in diluted sodium hypochlorite or iodophors with minimal disinfection time. After disinfection

  a.Dry heat sterilization: This method uses hot air

  the impressions should be rinsed to remove residual

  to kill microorganisms and has the advantage of not

  disinfectant.

  causing corrosion. It dehydrates the bacterial protein

  b . Disinfection of removable appliances: Immerse

  and decreases its resistance to denaturation

  completely into a disinfectant for the time recommended

  At a given temperature, dry heat is less efficient

  for tuberculocidal disinfection. ADA reccomends

  than moist heat, because dry heat is not as efficient a

  immersion in iodophors or sodium hypochlorite for

  heat conductor as moist heat.

  10 mins. Disinfection of baseplates of removable orthodontic appliances by using 0.12 chlorhexidine

  Rapid heat transfer Sterilizer: Also called as

  spray once or twice a week reduced the contamination

  forced air convention units. The mechanism of bacterial

  by Mutans Streptococci on the acrylic surface. 7

  killing is similar to conventional dry heat unit. They use higher temperature than other dry heat units and there

  c. . Disinfection of wax bites: ADA recommends

  is a controlled internal air flow within the chamber. As

  disinfection of wax bites by a spray-wipe-spray

  a result, they have a substantially shorter sterilization

  techniqueShould remain wet after the second spray

  intervals.

  for atleast 10 mins. Rinsed again to remove residual disinfectant.

  b.Steam pressure sterilization: Steam sterilization is the oldest and most commonly used of acceptable

  d. Stone cast disinfection:ADA recommends

  methods for instrument sterilization in dentistry since

  disinfection of wax bites by a spray-wipe-spray

  many years. Sterilization is accomplished by making

  technique should remain wet after the second spray for

  use of steam under pressure which causes denaturation

  atleast 10 mins.

  and coagulation of microbial proteins.Mechanism:

  e. Orthodontic pliers: High quality stainless

  When water heated under pressure, its boiling point is

  steel can be treated with dry heat, autoclave, chemical

  raised together with the temperature of the generated

  vapour, ethylene oxide. Plier with plastic parts can be

  steam.

  treated with ethylene oxide, chemical disinfection or

  c. Gas or ethylene oxide sterilization

  sterilization. 8

  Ethylene oxide: The use of ETO is recognized by

  13 Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine Toxicology, April-June 2018, Vol. 12, No. 2

  f. Orthodontic bands: Thread the bands to be

  indicators. Atleast one item per load should contain an

  sterilized on the auxiliary wire, and suspend the wire

  internal indicator.

  across the rack to dry heat or autoclave sterilization

  c. Physical Monitoring: Physical monitoring of the

  g. Orthodontic wires: TMA wires treated with

  sterilization process involves observing the gauges and

  ethylene oxide, autoclaving . NiTi wires treated with

  displays on the sterilizer and recording the sterilizing

  ethylene oxide. Stainless steel wires treated with

  temperature, pressure and exposure time. Thus, physical autoclave , dry heat and ethylene oxide. 9 monitoring may not detect problems resulting from overloading, improper packaging material or use of

  h. Orthodontic marking pencils:Conventional

  closed containers.

  orthodontic pencils can not be autoclaved. Gas

  sterilization can be done. 10 handling processed instruments

  i. Elastomeric Chains and Ligatures: Chemicals

  a. Drying and Cooling : Packs, pouches or

  are not suitable for disinfection of elastomeric ligatures

  cassettes processed through steam sterilizer may be wet

  and E-chains because they alter the physical properties

  and must be allowed to dry before handling