The supercritical percolation cluster The zero-range process in C

Density fluctuations on the percolation cluster 383 able problems for simple random walks. In order to treat a more general case, in these notes we discuss the density fluctuations for the zero-range process. Due to the inhomogeneity introduced by the randomness of the percolation cluster, the model turns out to be non-gradient. Following our previous work [6], a functional transformation of the empirical density puts the model back into the setup of gradient systems. The main tool allowing to make this functional transformation is a form of the compensated compactness lemma of Tartar [12], which is obtained in [5] using two-scale convergence. Therefore, the proof of a central limit theorem for the density fluctuations is reduced to the so-called Boltzmann-Gibbs principle, which roughly states that fluctuations of non-conserved quantities are faster than fluctuations of conserved quantities. In the right scaling limit, only fluctuations of the density of particles survive, allowing to obtain a martingale charac- terization of the scaling limit. In this way we prove that the limiting density field is given by a generalized Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, as predicted by the fluctuation-dissipation principle. In dimension d = 2, our method requires regularity of solutions of an associated elliptic problem which, up to our knowledge, have not been obtained for this model . The main technical innovation in this paper is what we call the connectivity lemma. In [6], an ellipticity condition makes it possible to compare the relaxation properties of our system with the relaxation properties of a zero-range process in the absence of the random environment. But the percolation cluster does not satisfy this ellipticity condition, since by construction the jump rate through a closed bond is 0. Moreover, the percolation cluster is locally non connected, since for a typical box of fixed side, the part of the percolation cluster lying inside this box is not connected. The connectivity lemma says that enlarging a bit the box we obtain a connected graph with good ergodic properties, allowing to get bounds on the relaxation to equilibrium. We point out that our results are still true in a more general context. We have chosen the zero- range process on the percolation cluster for simplicity and to capture the essential difficulties. Take for example a random barrier model on Z d on which the conductances are not bounded below see [5] for a more detailed definition, and take an interacting particle system satisfying the gradient condition before randomizing the lattice. Our results apply as well for these models, leading to the same results. These notes are organized as follows. In Section 2 we introduce the model and we state the main results. In Section 3 we introduce the corrected density field and we show how to obtain the main results from the compensated compactness lemma and the Boltzmann-Gibbs principle. In Section 4 we state and prove the connectivity lemma and we obtain the Boltzmann-Gibbs principle starting from it. 2 Definitions and main results

2.1 The supercritical percolation cluster

Let E = {e = 〈x y〉; x, y ∈ Z d , |x − y| = 1} be the set of nearest-neighbor, non oriented bonds in Z d . Let ω = {ωe; e ∈ E } be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables with Pωe = 1 = 1 − Pωe = 0 = p. Let us fix a realization of the sequence ω. Whenever ωe = 1, we say that the bond e is open . Otherwise we say that the bond e is closed. We say that two sites x, y in Z d are connected, which we denote by x ↔ y, if there is a finite sequence of points {x = x, x 1 , . . . , x n = y} such that for any i ∈ {0, . . . , n − 1}, |x i+ 1 − x i | = 1 and the bond 〈x i x i+ 1 〉 is open. For each x ∈ Z d , we define C ω, x = { y ∈ Z d ; x ↔ y}. We call C ω, x the cluster containing x. It is well known [7] that the probability of C ω, x being infinite is an increasing function of p, and that there exists p c ∈ 0, 1 such that this probability is strictly positive for p p c and equal to 0 for p p c . 384 Electronic Communications in Probability It is also well known that for p p c , with probability one, there exists a unique cluster of infinite cardinality. We denote this cluster by C ω. We call C ω the supercritical percolation cluster. From now on, we fix a number p ∈ p c , 1] and a sequence ω for which C ω is well defined. We also define θ p = P0 ∈ C ω.

2.2 The zero-range process in C

ω For x, y in Z d , we say that x ∼ y if |x − y| = 1 and 〈x y〉 is open. Let g : N = {0, 1, ...} → [0, ∞ be a function with g0 = 0. The zero-range process in C ω with interaction rate g· is the Markov process ξ t in Ω = N C ω generated by the operator L given by L f ξ = X x , y∈Z d x∼ y g ξx f ξ x , y − f ξ , where f : Ω → R is a local function, that is, it depends on ξx only for a finite number of sites x ∈ C ω, and ξ x , y is given by ξ x , y z =    ξx − 1, z = x ξ y + 1, z = y ξz, z 6= x , y. The dynamics of this process is easy to understand. At each time, a particle jumps from a site x ∈ C ω to a neighbor y ∼ x with exponential rate gk, where k is the number of particles at site x at that time. When the initial number of particles is finite, the process ξ t is a continuous-time Markov chain in Ω. In order to have a well defined family of ergodic, invariant measures for the process ξ t , we assume that gn 0 for any n 0 and that sup n |gn + 1 − gn| +∞. 2.1 Under these conditions, g· is bounded by a linear function: there exists c such that gn ≤ c n for any n. Let us define the product probability measures ¯ ν ϕ in Ω by the relation ¯ ν ϕ {ξx = k} = 1 Z ϕ ϕ k gk , where gk = g1 · · · gk for k ≥ 1, g0 = 1, ϕ ∈ [0, ∞ and Zϕ is the normalization con- stant. Due to 2.1, these measures are well defined up to some critical value ϕ c 0. Notice that the parameter ϕ has an interpretation as the strength of the interaction, since R g ξx¯ ν ϕ dξ = ϕ. It has been proved [1] that the measures {¯ ν ϕ ; ϕ ∈ [0, ϕ c } are ergodic and invariant under the evolution of ξ t . Since we are interested in density fluctuations, we will reparametrize this family of measures by its density of particles. For that purpose, define ρϕ = R ξx¯ ν ϕ dξ. It is not hard to see that ϕ 7→ ρϕ is a diffeomorphism from [0, ϕ c to [0, ρ c , where ρ c = lim ϕ→ϕ c ρϕ. In particular, the inverse function ρ 7→ ϕρ is well defined. We define ν ρ = ¯ ν ϕρ , measure for which now R ξxν ρ dξ = ρ. Density fluctuations on the percolation cluster 385

2.3 The density fluctuations

Dokumen yang terkait

AN ALIS IS YU RID IS PUT USAN BE B AS DAL AM P E RKAR A TIND AK P IDA NA P E NY E RTA AN M E L AK U K A N P R AK T IK K E DO K T E RA N YA NG M E N G A K IB ATK AN M ATINYA P AS IE N ( PUT USA N N O MOR: 9 0/PID.B /2011/ PN.MD O)

0 82 16

ANALISIS FAKTOR YANGMEMPENGARUHI FERTILITAS PASANGAN USIA SUBUR DI DESA SEMBORO KECAMATAN SEMBORO KABUPATEN JEMBER TAHUN 2011

2 53 20

EFEKTIVITAS PENDIDIKAN KESEHATAN TENTANG PERTOLONGAN PERTAMA PADA KECELAKAAN (P3K) TERHADAP SIKAP MASYARAKAT DALAM PENANGANAN KORBAN KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS (Studi Di Wilayah RT 05 RW 04 Kelurahan Sukun Kota Malang)

45 393 31

FAKTOR – FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PENYERAPAN TENAGA KERJA INDUSTRI PENGOLAHAN BESAR DAN MENENGAH PADA TINGKAT KABUPATEN / KOTA DI JAWA TIMUR TAHUN 2006 - 2011

1 35 26

A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ON “SPA: REGAIN BALANCE OF YOUR INNER AND OUTER BEAUTY” IN THE JAKARTA POST ON 4 MARCH 2011

9 161 13

Pengaruh kualitas aktiva produktif dan non performing financing terhadap return on asset perbankan syariah (Studi Pada 3 Bank Umum Syariah Tahun 2011 – 2014)

6 101 0

Pengaruh pemahaman fiqh muamalat mahasiswa terhadap keputusan membeli produk fashion palsu (study pada mahasiswa angkatan 2011 & 2012 prodi muamalat fakultas syariah dan hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta)

0 22 0

Pendidikan Agama Islam Untuk Kelas 3 SD Kelas 3 Suyanto Suyoto 2011

4 108 178

ANALISIS NOTA KESEPAHAMAN ANTARA BANK INDONESIA, POLRI, DAN KEJAKSAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 2011 SEBAGAI MEKANISME PERCEPATAN PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA PERBANKAN KHUSUSNYA BANK INDONESIA SEBAGAI PIHAK PELAPOR

1 17 40

KOORDINASI OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN (OJK) DENGAN LEMBAGA PENJAMIN SIMPANAN (LPS) DAN BANK INDONESIA (BI) DALAM UPAYA PENANGANAN BANK BERMASALAH BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG RI NOMOR 21 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN

3 32 52