The Understanding of STAD

b. Teams Teams are composed of four to five students from different level of performance, gender, and ethnicity. c. Quizzes Quizzes are given after one or two of teacher presentation and team practice. When doing quizzes, students are not allowed to help each other. It makes sure that every student has understood the material. d. Individual improvement scores In this way, student is given an opportunity for his or her performance goal which can be attained if he or she works harder and performs better than in the past. So, any student can contribute maximum points to his or her team. e. Team recognition Team which has the highest score will earn certificates or other rewards. From the statements above the writer concludes that Student Teams- Achievement Division STAD technique is one of Cooperative Learning method which assigns students into small heterogeneous team consists of four to five members from different performance level, gender, and ethnicity. They are expected to help each other so all members of group understand the subject because team scores is a sum of members’ scores.

2. The Advantages and Disadvantages of STAD

Every technique is used in teaching learning activity has some advantages and disadvantages. The advantages of using Student Teams-Achievement Division STAD technique are: a. Motivating the students to encourage and help each other in mastering skill presented by the teacher. b. Increasing the number of friendships among the students from different level of performance, gender, and ethnicity. c. Increasing students’ achievement and rising students’ self-esteem. d. Learning how to make a good partnership, appreciate each other and work cooperatively. e. Learning to think, solve problem and to integrating their knowledge and skill with other people who came from different level, gender, and ethnicity. f. The condition of learning is more relax and fun. g. Promoting students’ personal and social development. The disadvantages of using Student Teams-Achievement Division STAD technique are; a. Taking much time, because students need to adapt with their teammates firstly before discussing the material. b. The class situation becomes noisy. When students work in a group, they have to interact with their teammates to discuss the tasks are given. c. Wasting instructional time. Teacher has to stated clear instruction, sometimes teacher has to repeat it often because students prefer concern with their teammates than to teacher.

3. The Application of STAD in the Classroom

Like any other methods or teaching learning techniques, using Student Teams-Achievement Division STAD technique needs preparation that teachers should do. Here are the steps of using STAD in classroom; a. Teacher assigns students into small groups consist of four to five students from different level, gender, and ethnicity. b. Teacher asks the groups naming their own group. c. Teacher gives class presentation. Teacher explains the problem, giving the data, and giving the examples. It is done to introduce the concept and encourage students’ motivation. d. Teacher gives the worksheet to the groups. In their teams, they discuss the problems, compare the answers, and correct any misconceptions. The students are not only expected to answer the worksheet but also to understand the subject. The group gets success if all the members understand the subject. e. Teacher asks every group to read their answering and their argument, and other groups are allowed to give their opinion. f. After two periods of teacher presentation and group practice, teacher gives students an individual quizzes. In this way, students are not allowed to help each other. This activity is to measure that each student is individually responsible for knowing the subject. g. In the end of teaching, teacher gives certificate or other reward to the best group.

D. Grammar Translation Method GTM

1. The Understanding of GTM

Grammar Translation Method is not new because it has been used by language teachers for many years in different names. Five hundred years ago, it was called Classical Method which was used in the teaching of the classical languages, Latin and Greek. It was used for helping students read and appreciate foreign language literature, making students more familiar with the grammar of their native language so they would speak and write their native language better and helping students grow intellectually. As Diane L. Freeman states in her book, At one time it was called the Classical Method since it was first used in the teaching of the classical languages, Latin and Greek … this method was used for the purpose of helping students read and appreciate foreign language literature … students would become more familiar with the grammar of the their native language and that this familiarity would help them speak and write their native language better. Finally, it was thought that foreign language learning would help students grow intellectually; … 49 . This method of teaching became the model for foreign language study from the seventeenth to the nineteenth centuries. In the nineteenth century, this method had become the standard way of studying foreign languages in school. Now, this approach to foreign language teaching became known as the Grammar Translation Method GTM. 49 Freeman, Techniques and Principle …, p. 11. Grammar Translation Method GTM was known for the first time in the United States as the Prussian Method. This fact is based on B. Sears’ book, an American classics teacher, published in 1845 was entitled The Ciceronian or the Prussian Method of Teaching the Elements of the Latin Language. Teachers teach the language through detailed analysis of its grammar rules firstly, than applied it to the task of translating sentences and texts into students’ native language and vice versa. As Richards and Rodgers state, Grammar Translation Method is a way of studying a language that approaches the language first through detailed analysis of its grammar rules, followed by application of this knowledge to the task of translating sentences and texts into and out of the target language 50 . In this method, while teaching the text book, teacher translates every word and phrase from the target language into students’ native language and gives an explanation of individual points of grammar. Then, teacher gives students sentences. These sentences have to be translated from the target language into their native language and vice versa. The exercises in translation are based on various items covering the grammar of the target language. The method focuses on studying of grammar rules, declensions and conjugations, translation, and practice in writing sample sentences. W. M. Rivers states; Grammar Translation Method requires students to translate accurately the whole texts word by word from students’ native language into target language or from the target language to students’ native language, much stress on memorizing numerous grammatical rules and exceptions as well as enormous vocabulary lists, but little training in using the language actively to express one’s own meaning, even in writing 51 . From those statements above, the writer concludes that Grammar Translation Method is a traditional teaching method that focuses on the analysis of the language grammar rules and translate the structure from the target 50 Jack C. Richards and Theodore S. Rodgers, Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching: a description and analysis, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990, p. 3. 51 W. M. Rivers, Teaching Foreign Language Skills, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1981, 2 nd ed., p. 31.

Dokumen yang terkait

Comparing The Effectiveness Of Using Jigsaw Technique And Students Team Achievement Divisions Technique In Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Research At Second Grade Students Of Mts Salafiyah Depok)

2 44 148

The Effectiveness Of Using Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) Techniques in Teaching Reading

1 16 116

The Effectiveness Of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (Stad) Technique On Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Study At Second Grade Students Of Smp Islam Ruhama Ciputat)

1 8 168

The Effectiveness Of Using The Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) Technique Towards Students’ Understanding Of The Simple Past Tense (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Trimulia, Jakarta Selatan)

1 8 117

The Effectiveness of Using Card Games Technique in Teaching Vocabulary (A Quasi Experimental Study at the Seventh Grade of SMP Negeri 18 Tangerang)

1 4 125

The Effectiveness Of Using Reading, Encoding, Annotating And Pondering (Reap) Technique Towards Students’ Reading Skill Of Descriptive Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study At The Seventh Grade Of Mts Salafiyah)

5 18 138

The Effectiveness Of Learning The Simple Past Tense Through Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) : An Experimental Study at the First Year of Al-Nur Senior High School Cibinong

0 6 89

Applying Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Technique to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension in Discussion Text. (A Classroom Action Research in the Third Grade of SMA Fatahillah Jakarta)

5 42 142

The Effectiveness of Using Inductive Technique in Teaching Degrees of Comparison (A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP IT Cordova)

1 6 88

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STUDENT TEAM-ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) IN IMPROVING JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION : A Quasi Experimental Study of Eighth Grade Students at One Junior High School in Bandung.

0 1 31