Reporting a Statement. The Kinds of Indirect Speech

1. The Understanding of Cooperative Learning

Cooperative Learning appeared in the early seventies following the pioneering work of John Dewey, and later of Alice Miel and Herbert Thelen. As Robert E. Slavin informs that , ―Social psychological research on cooperation dates back to the 1920s, but research on specific applications of cooperative learning to the classroom did not begin until the early 1970s 24 .‖ It is used as an alternative teaching method to improve students’ cognitive, academic, social, and affective outcomes in the classroom. As Carlos J. Ovando and friends write in their book, ―In the United States since the 1970s, cooperative learning has been used to improve cognitive, academic, social, and affective outcomes in classrooms as an alternative to individualistic, competitive structures 25 .‖ The challenges of teacher education for employing cooperative methods and implementing them in the school still remain. Over the course of the past three decades, it became increasingly apparent to the proponents and investigators of cooperative learning that adoption and institutionalization of these approaches to instruction required system-wide changes in school organization and functioning. There are many reasons that Cooperative Learning is entering into educational system. As Slavin states: There are many reasons that Cooperative Learning is entering the mainstream of educational practice. One is the extraordinary research base supporting the use of Cooperative Learning to increase student achievement, as well as such other outcomes as improved intergroup relations, acceptance of academically handicapped classmates, and increased self-esteem. Another reason is the growing realization that students need to learn to think, to solve problems, and to integrate and apply knowledge and skills, and that Cooperative Learning is an excellent means to that end 26 . This method is based on the word ―getting better together‖ which focuses in giving more opportunities in learning and giving good atmosphere to the 24 Robert E. Slavin, Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice, Boston: Allyn Bacon, 1995 2 nd ed., p. 4. 25 Carlos J. Ovando, et.al., Bilingual ESL Classrooms: Teaching in Multicultural Contexts, New York: McGraww-Hill, 2003, 3 rd ed., p. 93. 26 Slavin, Cooperative Learning …, p. 2. students in receiving and exploring knowledge, attitude, norm, and social skills which are useful for their life in society. Etin Solihatin defines that ―cooperative mengandung pengertian bekerja bersama dalam mencapai tujuan bersama 27 .” In cooperative classroom, students are expected to help their teammates in mastering the current knowledge by arguing and discussion. All of the members have to take a part in every discussion, so they can learn effectively in their group. All Cooperative Learning methods share the idea that students work together to learn and are responsible for their teammates’ learning as well as their own 28 . With Cooperative Learning method, students not only improve their knowledge but also improve other aspects. Panitz states there are the benefits of Collaborative Learning; 1 Improved learning and achievement. 2 Improved skills. 3 Improved engagement and responsibility. 4 Improved relationships. 5 Classroom resembles real life social and employment situations 29 . In Cooperative Learning, teachers exploit the small groups which make the students possible in learning together to maximize their learning and other members in that group. R. Bruce Williams states, ―Cooperative Learning is the instructional use of small groups so that the students work together to maximize their own and other’s learning 30 .‖ There are some categories when constructing cooperative learning groups. The size of the groups is relatively small. The groups consist of four to five students. The groups are heterogeneous, contain both males and females of different ability levels and if possible different ethnic backgrounds and social classes. Slavin states, ―The teams are heterogeneous – made up of high, average, and low achievers, boys and girls, and students of different ethnic group 31 .‖ So, the groups must be constructed by the teacher. Do not construct the groups by 27 Etin Solihatin dan Raharjo, Cooperative Learning, Analisis Model Pembelajaran IPS, Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara, 2008, p. 4. 28 Slavin, Cooperative Learning …, p. 5. 29 Chris Watkins, et.al., Effective Learning in Classrooms, London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 2007, p. 100. 30 R. Bruce Williams, Cooperative Learning a Standard for High Achievement, California: Corwin Press, 2002, p. 3. 31 Slavin, Cooperative Learning …, p. 4.

Dokumen yang terkait

Comparing The Effectiveness Of Using Jigsaw Technique And Students Team Achievement Divisions Technique In Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Research At Second Grade Students Of Mts Salafiyah Depok)

2 44 148

The Effectiveness Of Using Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) Techniques in Teaching Reading

1 16 116

The Effectiveness Of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (Stad) Technique On Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Study At Second Grade Students Of Smp Islam Ruhama Ciputat)

1 8 168

The Effectiveness Of Using The Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) Technique Towards Students’ Understanding Of The Simple Past Tense (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Trimulia, Jakarta Selatan)

1 8 117

The Effectiveness of Using Card Games Technique in Teaching Vocabulary (A Quasi Experimental Study at the Seventh Grade of SMP Negeri 18 Tangerang)

1 4 125

The Effectiveness Of Using Reading, Encoding, Annotating And Pondering (Reap) Technique Towards Students’ Reading Skill Of Descriptive Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study At The Seventh Grade Of Mts Salafiyah)

5 18 138

The Effectiveness Of Learning The Simple Past Tense Through Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) : An Experimental Study at the First Year of Al-Nur Senior High School Cibinong

0 6 89

Applying Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Technique to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension in Discussion Text. (A Classroom Action Research in the Third Grade of SMA Fatahillah Jakarta)

5 42 142

The Effectiveness of Using Inductive Technique in Teaching Degrees of Comparison (A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP IT Cordova)

1 6 88

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STUDENT TEAM-ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) IN IMPROVING JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION : A Quasi Experimental Study of Eighth Grade Students at One Junior High School in Bandung.

0 1 31