The Technique of Analyzing Data

13 65 90 25 14 50 60 10 15 40 60 20 16 45 60 15 17 45 50 5 18 45 55 10 19 40 70 30 20 40 75 35 ∑ 995 1445 450 Mean 49.75

72.25 22.5

The Table 3.1 above describes that the lowest score in the pre-test is 40 and the highest score is 65. Meanwhile, the lowest score in the post-test is 50 and the highest score is 90. Therefore, it can be summarized that the lowest and the highest scores in post-test is higher than in pre-test. Table 3.2 consists of four columns, the first column shows the number of students in the control class Y, the second column shows the pre-test scores, the third column shows the post-test scores and the last column shows the gained scores which are resulted from the post-test score is subtracted the pre-test score. Table 3.2 The Students’ Scores of Control Class Using Grammar Translation Method GTM Students Y Pre-test Score Post-test Score Gained d Score Post Test – Pre Test 1 60 65 5 2 45 55 10 3 45 50 5 4 40 50 10 5 35 55 20 6 35 55 20 7 50 75 25 8 40 55 15 9 45 55 10 10 50 55 5 11 50 50 12 50 65 15 13 45 55 10 14 30 50 20 15 45 45 16 40 70 30 17 50 65 15 18 60 65 5 19 45 70 25 20 40 50 10 ∑ 900 1155 255 Mean 45

57.75 12.75

The Table 3. 2 above describes that the lowest score in the pre-test is 30 and the highest score is 60. Meanwhile, the lowest score in the post-test is 45 and the highest score is 75. Therefore, it can be summarized that the lowest and the highest scores in post-test is higher than in pre-test.

1. The Analysis of Data

Before the writer analyzed the data, he had calculated the data into the statistic calculation. The writer used t test formula to find the empirical evidence statistically and to make the testing of hypothesis will be easier. Before it, the writer made the calculation table from two variables. The table consists of eight columns; the first column shows the number of students in the experiment class, the second column shows the number of students in the control class, the third column shows the students‟ gained scores in the

Dokumen yang terkait

Comparing The Effectiveness Of Using Jigsaw Technique And Students Team Achievement Divisions Technique In Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Research At Second Grade Students Of Mts Salafiyah Depok)

2 44 148

The Effectiveness Of Using Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) Techniques in Teaching Reading

1 16 116

The Effectiveness Of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (Stad) Technique On Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Study At Second Grade Students Of Smp Islam Ruhama Ciputat)

1 8 168

The Effectiveness Of Using The Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) Technique Towards Students’ Understanding Of The Simple Past Tense (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Trimulia, Jakarta Selatan)

1 8 117

The Effectiveness of Using Card Games Technique in Teaching Vocabulary (A Quasi Experimental Study at the Seventh Grade of SMP Negeri 18 Tangerang)

1 4 125

The Effectiveness Of Using Reading, Encoding, Annotating And Pondering (Reap) Technique Towards Students’ Reading Skill Of Descriptive Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study At The Seventh Grade Of Mts Salafiyah)

5 18 138

The Effectiveness Of Learning The Simple Past Tense Through Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) : An Experimental Study at the First Year of Al-Nur Senior High School Cibinong

0 6 89

Applying Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Technique to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension in Discussion Text. (A Classroom Action Research in the Third Grade of SMA Fatahillah Jakarta)

5 42 142

The Effectiveness of Using Inductive Technique in Teaching Degrees of Comparison (A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP IT Cordova)

1 6 88

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STUDENT TEAM-ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) IN IMPROVING JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION : A Quasi Experimental Study of Eighth Grade Students at One Junior High School in Bandung.

0 1 31