Result of Pretest of Experimental and Controlled Class

of the controlled class is 76 while the lowest score is 36. The median score is 52.00 and the mode score is 40. The table of frequency distribution from the data is presented as follows: Table 4.6 Table of Frequency Distribution of Pretest Result of Controlled Class Controlled Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 36 1 2.6 2.6 2.6 40 6 15.8 15.8 18.4 44 5 13.2 13.2 31.6 48 5 13.2 13.2 44.7 52 5 13.2 13.2 57.9 56 4 10.5 10.5 68.4 60 4 10.5 10.5 78.9 64 3 7.9 7.9 86.8 68 3 7.9 7.9 94.7 72 1 2.6 2.6 97.4 76 1 2.6 2.6 100.0 Total 38 100.0 100.0 The diagram from the data of the controlled class is presented as follows: Picture 4.2 Diagram of Pretest Result of Controlled Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76

2. Result of Posttest of Experimental and Controlled Class

The result of posttest of experimental and controlled class based on SPSS version 22 was gained from the steps as follows: Analyze → Descriptive Statistics → Frequencies. Insert Experimental X in variable → Click Statistics and Checklist Mean, Median, Mode, Sum, Std. deviation, Variance, Minimum and Maximum → Continue → OK. Result gained from the pretest in class X.5 as the experimental class of the research is presented in Table 4.7 below: Table 4.7 Table of Data Description of Posttest Result of Experimental Class Statistics Experimental N Valid 38 Missing Mean 68.74 Median 68.00 Mode 68 Std. Deviation 10.474 Variance 109.713 Minimum 48 Maximum 88 Sum 2612 Table 4.7 shows that the posttest data of the experimental class is 38 students with the sum score of the posttest 2612. Mean score from the experimental class is 68.74, the variance score is 109.713, and the standard deviation is 10.474.The highest score of the experimental class is 88 while the lowest score is 48. The median score is 68.00 and the mode score is 68. The table of frequency distribution from the data is presented as follows: Table 4.8 Table of Frequency Distribution of Posttest Result of Experimental Class Experimental Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 48 1 2.6 2.6 2.6 52 4 10.5 10.5 13.2 56 1 2.6 2.6 15.8 60 4 10.5 10.5 26.3 64 3 7.9 7.9 34.2 68 9 23.7 23.7 57.9 72 5 13.2 13.2 71.1 76 2 5.3 5.3 76.3 80 4 10.5 10.5 86.8 84 4 10.5 10.5 97.4 88 1 2.6 2.6 100.0 Total 38 100.0 100.0 Beside the table of the frequency distribution, it also can be described by a diagram which is presented as follows: Picture 4.3 Diagram of Posttest Result of Experimental Class In analyzing the result of posttest has the same steps except the inserted variable is not the experimental X but the controlled Y. Result gained from the 2 4 6 8 10 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 posttest in class X.6 as the controlled class of the research is presented in Table 4.9 below: Table 4.9 Table of Data Description of Posttest Result of Controlled Class Statistics Controlled N Valid 38 Missing Mean 60.95 Median 60.00 Mode 60 Std. Deviation 9.180 Variance 84.267 Minimum 40 Maximum 88 Sum 2316 Table 4.9 shows that the posttest data of the controlled class is 38 students with the sum score of the posttest 2316. Mean score from the controlled class is 60.95, the variance score is 84.267, and the standard deviation is 9.180. The highest score of the controlled class is 88 while the lowest score is 40. The median score is 60.00 and the mode score is 60. The table of frequency distribution from the data is presented as follows: Table 4.10 Table of Frequency Distribution of Posttest Result of Controlled Class Controlled Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 40 1 2.6 2.6 2.6 48 3 7.9 7.9 10.5 52 4 10.5 10.5 21.1 56 6 15.8 15.8 36.8 60 7 18.4 18.4 55.3 64 7 18.4 18.4 73.7 68 6 15.8 15.8 89.5 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 72 80 2 1 5.3 2.6 5.3 2.6 94.7 97.4 88 1 2.6 2.6 100.0 Total 38 100.0 100.0 Beside the table of the frequency distribution, it also can be described by a diagram which is presented as follows: Picture 4.4 Diagram of Posttest Result of Controlled Class In addition, in analyzing the data, the experimental class and the controlled class were compared to one another. It was done in order to prove statistically whether there is any significant difference between the two classes. There were two things needed to analyze before calculating statistical hypothesis; test of normality and homogeneity. After getting the data which are the results of the students ’ reading comprehension of both classes, then the data were analyzed by using statistic calculation of the test formula.

3. Normality Test

The normality test was performed by using Kolmogorov-Smirnnov and Shapiro-Wilk. The test was done to determine if the distribution of the data from the sample is normal or not. Thus, SPSS version 22 was used. If the normality is more than the level of significance α 0.05, the test is normally distributed. The 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 40 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 80 88

Dokumen yang terkait

Applying Think-aloud Technique in Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (Quasi Experimental Study of Tenth Grade Students of SMK Bhakti 17 Jagakarsa)

0 11 119

The effect of directed reading thinking activity and reading interest on students' reading comprehension

0 7 125

The Influence Of Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr) Technique On Students’ Achievement In Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text (A Quasi Experimental Study On The Implementation Of Csr At Sma Pgri 109 Kota Tangerang)

1 13 129

THE EFFECT OF TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH DIRECTED READING – THINKING ACTIVITY (DRTA) STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ NARRATIVE TEXT ACHIEVEMENT AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMP PGRI 2 KATIBUNG LAMPUNG SELATAN

1 47 55

DIRECTED READING THINKING ACTIVITY (DRTA) ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION

0 14 70

The effectiveness of directed reading activity towards students’ reading skill of descriptive text: an experimental study at the seventh grade student of MTs Al-Ihsan Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan.

0 2 122

THE EFFECT OF PREDICTION STRATEGY ON STUDENTS READING COMPREHENSION IN NARRATIVE TEXT.

1 9 21

THE EFFECT OF DIRECTED READING THINKING ACTIVITY STRATEGY ON STUDENTS READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT IN REPORT TEXT.

0 3 21

DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXT THROUGH DIRECTED READING-THINKING ACTIVITY STRATEG

0 0 11

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIRECTED READING THINKING ACTIVITY (DRTA) STRATEGY FOR STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION IN NARRATIVE TEXT

0 0 15