b. Acting
In this phase; the researcher applied the new lesson plan. As the teacher, the researcher also emphasized and reviews schematic structures to the students in
order to make them getting better understanding. In this phase, the students were also taught to paraphrase a story. Generally, it did all the activities in cycle 1, to
make sure the students understand well about the concept.
c. Observing
The researcher observed students’ participation and achievement in this
phase. Here, the researcher tried to make sure whether students improved their understanding or not and differed their achievements between cycle 1 and cycle 2.
d. Reflecting
The teacher discussed about the implementation of the method also the result of the implementation of the modified action and decides whether the action
should be continued or not.
G. The Techniques of Data Analysis
The observaion and interview were conducted before and after Classroom Action Research used to analyze qualitative data. On the other side, to conduct the
quantitative data, it was conducted questionnaire and test. Here several steps were done to get the data. There was some numerical data to be processed. First, the
researcher measured the average or mean of students’ reading score per-action
within one cycle. It was used to know how the students’ reading skills were
improved. It used the formula as below:
15
X̅ = Σx
n X̅
: mean or average.
x : total score of all students.
n : number of students.
15
Sudjana, Metoda Statistika, Bandung: PT Tarsiti, 2002, p. 67.
Next, the writer tried to get the class percentage which passed the minimal mastery level kriterian KKM considering English subject gains score 75
seventy five. The formula is:
16
P = F
n x
P : Pre test presentage.
F : Total students who get score
≥ 75. n
: Number of students.
Then, after getting average of students’ score per-action, the researcher
identified whether the students improved their understanding of narrative text from pre-test up to post test 1 in cycle 1 and post test 2 in cycle 2. The writer used
the formula below to analyze the data : P =
y − y y x
P : Presentage of students’ improvement.
y1 : Average of post test 1.
y : Mean of pre-test.
P = y − y
y x P1
: Presentage of students’ improvement. Y2
: Average of post test 2. y
: Mean of pre-test.
16
Anas Sudjono, Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2008, p. 43.
Kategori