The  role  of  the  researcher  in  this  reserach  was  a  main  actor.  In  the observation  season,  the  writer  acted  as  an  independent  observer,  he  did  not
involve  in  teaching  learning  process.  Then,  in  the  next  season,  the  writer  took  a part  of  teaching  learning  process.  The  writer  acted  as  the  English  teacher  in  the
research process. Therefore, the writer prepared a lesson plan and pre action test before  implementing  story  mapping  method  in  teaching  narrative  text  process,
also  post  action  test  form  after  implementation.  In  the  final,  he  calculated  and analyzed data to make a report as a result of the research.
F. The Data Collecting Procedure
In  gathering  the  data  of  this  research,  there  were  some  techniques  used, namely;  observation,  interview,  questionnaire  and  test.  To  make  it  clearer,  here
are the following details: 1.   Observation
Through  the  observation  as  the  first  technique  of  collecting  data.  In  this technique,  the  data  was  taken  from  the  notes  about  everything  happened  during
teaching  learning  process  which  were  about  the  teacher’s  treatment  to  the students,  which  method  the  teacher  used  and  how  the  process  worked.  The
observation  also  were  about  students’  responses  and  participation  in  teaching learning process. This method also as a barometer to do previous data collecting.
By  direct  observing,  there  are  possibilities  to  take  some  notes,  behavior, development, and so on, which happens any time.
9
2.  Interview The  way  of  collecting  data  of  pre-action  was  used  also  interview
guidelines. It was the second technique to get more information in collecting data. There two kinds of interview which were used. They were: unstructured interview
and  structured  interview.
10
The  interview  conducted  to  both  English  teacher  and some  students  who  were  the  participants  of  teaching  learning  process.  The
9
Moh Nazir, Metode Penelitian, Bogor: Gralia Indonesia, 2005, p. 175.
10
Suharismi Arikunto,  Prosedur Penelitian, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010,  p. 172.
interview was about the English teaching learning process at MTs Tarbiyatul falah which  was  conducted  before  and  after  implementing  story  mapping  in  teaching
narrative  text.  Then,  the  result  of  interview  was  taken  as  guidelines  to  complete the data needed.
3.  Questionnaire In  this  collecting  data  technique,  gaining  the  data  was  conducted  twice,
pre-action  and  after  implementing  CAR.  It  was  used  structured  questionnaire which contained the questions and alternative answers to them. In this technique,
the students were supposed to choose one of the alternative answers according to their personal estimation of each question. After conducting this phase, it resulted
a percentage of students’ response. Its aim was to support other data to get a valid research result.
4.  Test The  test  was  the  last  technique  used  to  know  about  the  students’
improvement  of  understanding  narrative  text  by  using  story  mapping  method. This technique was used to know the students’ achievement in learning narrative
text  by  using  story  mapping.  It  may  be  as  the main  technique  in  collecting  data. So,  this  technique  would  be  told  more  how  this  technique  worked  to  prove  that
story mapping could improve the students’ understanding of narrative text. The result of tests were provided by some tables to make it more eficient
and communicative enough.
11
11
Sugiyono, Statistika untuk Penelitian, Bandung: Alfabeta, 2005, p. 22.
The  wholeness  of  the  research  process  would  be  drawn  in  the  Chart  3.1 below:
Adapted from Suharsimi Arikunto
12
Chart 3.1 The Kurt Lewins’s Design of CAR
In  General,  there  are  many  Classroom  Action  Research  designed  by some  experts.  Otherwise,  in  this  research  used
Kurt Lewin’s design for many
12
Ibid.,  p. 137.
Planning Acting
Reflecting Observing
Planning Acting
Reflecting Observing
Cycle 1
Cycle 2
reasons.  It  is  easy  to  be  applied,  applicable,  suitable  for  this  study.  Kurt Lewin’s  design  consists  of  four  phases  within  one  cycle.  They  are  planning,
acting,  observing,  and  reflecting.
13
Teacher  is  possible  to  find  a  new  problem or  the  previous  unfinished  problems  yet  after  applying  first  cycle.  If  it
happens, it is necessary to do same way to submit the second cycle. Here some explanations about each phase and how it works.
1.  Cycle 1 a.  Planning
In this season, the research was conducted as a real  action. Its aim was to know what problems of the students in learning English in terms of reading
lesson  especially  in  understanding  narrative  texts.  So,  the  English  teacher would  know  what  he  should  do.  Therefore,  in  this  phase,  there  were  many
things should be prepared to start the action. Firstly, lesson plan was prepared to make a scenario of the action. Then, choosing teaching materials, After that,
making  time  table,  preparing  all  of  media  which  needed,  also  preparing evaluation sheet to measure the s
tudents’ achievement in the end of this cycle.
b. Acting
In this phase, everything which was determined on the lesson plan was done as on the scenario. Firstly, The teacher asked the students about narrative
text  and  their  difficulties  in  understanding  the  texts.  Then,  the  teacher explained the schematic structures of narrative texts and everything that can be
found in narrative texts.  After that, the teacher introduced and explained what story  map  was  with  the  strategy  used  by  students  in  learning  narrative  text.
Next, asked The  students to filled out some points  in the story map according to the texts which has been given.
13
Ibid., p. 137.