58
B. Suggestions
In this part, the writer offered some suggestions. They were, generally, for the Vocational School students who learn English writing and for the English
teachers who are applying the designed materials and, specifically, for the students and the English teachers of SMK BOPKRI I Yogyakarta. Moreover, they
also suggested for future researchers who are interested in conducting similar stud ies.
It is suggested that the students should be active in the learning process. It would give them benefit to develop their writing skill quickly and well. The writer
also suggests the students to practice writing more since practice makes perfect. Since the writer did not implement the designed materials, she has some
suggestions for the English teachers who will implement the designed materials. First, the teacher should comprehend the Task-Based Learning framework well
before conducting the lessons. Second, the teacher should explain the Task-Based Learning framework to the students as well so tha t they understand how to deal
with each step of the learning process. Third, the teacher should let the students try to solve their problems by themselves, so that they can learn from the process.
For future researchers, the writer suggests that future researchers should up- date the materials with the phenomena happening around the students or the
students’ daily activities since those materials will be interesting and be able to explore something more from the students. Additionally, the topics offered in
these designed materials are only few of many topics needed by the students at an elementary level. It will be better if the next researchers find other interesting
topics, which are wanted and needed by the students, using different approaches. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
59
REFERENCES
Academy of Teaching Excellence, Metropolitan State College of Denver, C. 2002. ASSURE Model. http:www.mscd.edu~act2courseconstructassure.html,
accessed on 2
nd
March 2007. Anwar, M. F. 2005. English in Progress for 2
nd
Year of SMK. Bogor: Yudhistira. ASSURE Model. http:www.angelfire.comga3kstrawickASSURE_Model.htm,
accessed on 9
th
March 2007. Azar, B. S. 1989. Understanding and Using English Grammar. New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall, Inc. Best, J. W. Kahn, J. V. 1986. Research in Education 5
th
Ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Borg, W. R. Gall, M. D. 1983. Educational Research: An Introduction. New York: Longman, Inc.
Bram, B. 1995. Write Well: Improving Writing Skills. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.
Brown, H. D. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Brown, H. D. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Budihanto, A. et al. 2000. Global Access to the World of Work Book 1. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Davis, R. Copyright 1998-2007. Daily Schedule. http:www.esl- lab.com
scheduleschedrd1.htm, accessed on 20
th
June 2007. Davis, R. Copyright 1998-2007. Telephoning. http:www.esllab.commeet
meetsc1.htm, accessed on 20
th
June 2007. Dick, W. Reiser, R. A. 1989. Planning Effective Instruction. Boston: Allyn and
Bacon. Fleming, C. M. 1955. Adolescence: Its Social Psychology: with an Introduction to
recent findings from the fields of Anthropology, Physiology, Medicine, Psychometrics and Sociometry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, Ltd.
60 Gay, L. R. 1992. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and
Application. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Granger, C. 1980. Play Games with English. Oxford: Heinemann International.
Hadfield, J. 1984. Elementary Communication Games. Edinburg: Thomas Nelson
and Sons Ltd. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D. 1982. Instructional Media and the
New Technologies of Instruction. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Indrisano, R. Squire, J. R. 2000. Perspectives on Writing: Research, Theory,
and Practice. Delaware, USA: International Reading Association, Inc. Job Vacancy. 2007, 10
th
February. Jawa Pos, 10. Larsen-Freeman, D. 2000. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching.
New York: Oxford University Press. Littlejohn, A. 1991. Writing 1 Student’s Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. Medinnus, G. R Johnson, R. C. 1969. Child and Adolescent Psychology:
Behavior and Development. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. McCrimmon, J. M. 1984. Writing with a Purpose. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Company. Nunan, D. 1991. Language Teaching Methodology. New York: Prentice Hall
International. Nunan, D. 1999. Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston: Heinle
Heinle Publishers. Nunan, D. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. New York: The McGraw-
Hill Companies. Nunan, D. 2004. Task-Based Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. Okada, S., Ohkoshi, T., Nakamura, M. 2007, January. Educating the Future of
Japan. Japan Plus: Asia-Pacific Perspectives. IV, 6-7. Raimes, A. 1983. Techniques in Teaching Writing. New York: Oxford University
Press. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
61 Richards, J. C. Renandya, W. A. 2002. Methodology in Language Teaching: An
Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Richards, J. C. Rodgers, T. S. 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language
Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sakti, A. et al. 2000. Global Access to the World of Work Book 3. Jakarta:
Depdiknas. Soekisno, R. B. A. 2007. Bagaimanakah Perjalanan Kurikulum Nasional pada
Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah? http:rbaryans.wordpress.com2007 0516bagaimanakah-perjalanan-kurikulum- nasional-pada-pendidikan-dasar-
dan- menengah, accessed on 28
th
November 2007. Sudiartini, A. et al. 2000. Global Access to the World of Work Book 2. Jakarta:
Depdiknas. Syam, F. A. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan SMK Negeri 3 Bogor.
http:www.psmk.netindex.html, accessed on 2
nd
March 2007. The ASSURE Model. http:www.unca.edueducationedtechtechcourse
assure.html, accessed on 2
nd
March 2007. Tiedt, I. M. 1989. Writing: From Topic to Evaluation. Needham Heights,
Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon. Tim Instruktur Nasional Bahasa Inggris. 2001. Window on the World Year 1.
Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga. Tim Instruktur Nasional Bahasa Inggris. 2001. Window on the World Year 2.
Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga. Travers, R M. W. 1978. An Introduction to Educational Research. New York:
Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. Tribble, C. 1996. Writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Willis, J. 1996. Framework for Task -Based Learning. Edinburgh Gate, Harlow:
Addison Wesley Longman, Ltd. Zappa, A. 2007, June. Hooked on Comics. Reader Digest, 113-115.
Zemach, D. 2007, March. The Process of Learning Process Writing. Essential
Teacher, IV 1, 12-13. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
62
63
64
Appendix C. Proposal Penelitian
DESIGNING A SET OF INSTRUCTIONAL WRITING MATERIALS USING TASK-BASED LANGUAGE TEACHING
FOR THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK BOPKRI I
YOGYAKARTA
Proposal Penelitian
Diajukan untuk Memenuhi Salah Satu Syarat Memperoleh Gelar Sarjana Pendidikan
Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Oleh YOHANA IKA HARNITA SARI
Nomor Mahasiswa: 03 1214 024
PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS JURUSAN PENDIDIKAN BAHASA DAN SENI
FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN UNIVERSITAS SANATA DHARMA
YOGYAKARTA 2007
65
Dalam studi yang berjudul Designing a Set of Instructional Writing Materials Using Task-Based Language Teaching for the Second Grade
Students of SMK BOPKRI I Yogyakarta ini, penulis membuat atau mend isain
satu set materi belajar mengajar menggunakan metode pengajaran bahasa dengan pemberian latihan- latihan Task-Based Language Teaching untuk keterampilan
menulis writing dalam mata pelajaran bahasa Inggris. Materi tersebut diperuntukan bagi siswa-siswi kelas 2 SMK BOPKRI I Yogyakarta yang memberi
penekanan pada pentingnya kemampuan menulis mereka dalam bahasa Inggris. Materi writing tersebut sebagian besar berupa latihan- latihan yang disusun secara
komunikatif dan sesuai dengan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan KTSP yang dimiliki oleh SMK BOPKRI I Yogyakarta.
A. LATAR BELAKANG
Kategori