INDICATORS SOURCE OF LEARNING MATERIALS LEARNING METHODOLOGY LEARNING MEDIA

101 101

G. LEARNING STEPS

Meeting 1: March 23 rd , 2016 Learning Interaction Teacher and Learner Activity Time Allocation Pre-Learning Interaction 1. Lecturer reviews briefly last week materials about argumentative essay. 2. Lecturer divides the students into groups with each consists of three to four students. 3. Lecturer asks the students to do check their writings one another, give peer feedback, and do peer assessment in the group 15’ Main Learning Interaction

A. ANALYZING

1. Students analyze the structure of the first draft of their friends’ argumentative essay 2. Students analyze the arguments in the first draft of their friends’ argumentative essay 60’ B. EVALUATING 1. Students evaluate and criticize the position of the writer in their friends’ first draft of their argumentative essay 2. Students evaluate and criticize the arguments, sources, and evidences used in their friends’ first draft of their argumentative essay PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 102 102 3. Students evaluate and criticize the perspectives of counter arguments and the rebuttals in their friends’ first draft of their argumentative essay

C. SYNTHESIZING

1. Students synthesize the evaluation given by their friends to revise the first draft of their argumentative essay Post-learningConclusionClosing Lecturer assesses students’ progress in writing their argumentative essay and tells the students to prepare for their revised draft in the next meeting. 15’ Total 90’ Meeting 2: March 30 th , 2016 Learning Interaction Teacher and Learner Activity Time Allocation Pre-Learning Interaction 1. Lecturer reviews briefly last week materials about argumentative essay. 2. Lecturer divides the students into groups with each consists of three to four students. 3. Lecturer asks the students to do check their writings one another, give peer feedback, and do peer assessment in the group 15’ PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 103 103 Main Learning Interaction

A. ANALYZING 1. Students analyze the structure of the

second draft of their friends’ argumentative essay 2. Students analyze the arguments in the second draft of their friends’ argumentative essay 60’ B. EVALUATING 1. Students evaluate and criticize the position of the writer in their friends’ second draft of their argumentative essay 2. Students evaluate and criticize the arguments, sources, and evidences used in their friends’ second draft of their argumentative essay 3. Students evaluate and criticize the perspectives of counter arguments and the rebuttals in their friends’ second draft of their argumentative essay

C. SYNTHESIZING

1. Students synthesize the evaluation given by their friends to revise the second draft of their argumentative essay Post-learningConclusionClosing Lecturer assesses students’ progress in writing their argumentative essay and tells the students to prepare for their revised draft in the 15’ PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 104 104 next meeting. Total 90’

H. LEARNING ASSESSMENT

1. Form of assessment: written test Students write an argumentative essay on English Education 2. Assessment instrument: scoring rubric attached Students assess their argumentative essay one and each other by doing peer assessment and using scoring rubric to check their writing progress in each group Yogyakarta, March 21 st 2016 Approved by, Composed by, Priyatno Ardi, S.Pd., M.Hum. Andreas Rahardjo Adi Baskoro CRW II Lecturer Researcher 105 105 LESSON PLAN Cycle 2 University : Sanata Dharma University Study Program : English Language Education Course : Critical Reading and Writing II ClassWeekSemesterBatch : B742014 Material : Writing on Education; Argumentative Essay Skill : Writing Time Allocation : 2 x 45’

A. GOALS

1. Develop critical reading skills on a variety of issues

2. Write responsive, analytical, and argumentative essays in response to educational enterprises

B. INDICATORS

1. Behavioural indicator: Students actively participate during the discussion in pair 2. Product indicator: Students have certain improvement in their critical writing with increasing scores from each meeting in the peer assessment

C. MATERIALS

1. Argumentative Essay a. Definition An argumentative essay is an essay in which you agree or disagree with an issue, using reasons to support our argument. b. Goal PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI