3. The Definition of Error Analysis
To know errors which are made by students, the teachers must do error analysis.  Brown  stated  that
―Error  analysis  is  a  branch  of  applied  linguistics where  the teacher can observe,  analyze and  classify  errors that students  made
to reveal something of the system operating within the learner, led to a surge of study of learners’ errors.‖
9
Then,  Ellis  also  argued  that ―Error Analysis EA was one of the first
method  used  to  investigate  learner  language.  It  achieved  considerable popularity in the 1970s, replacing contrastive analysis.
‖
10
Based on the statements above, when a teacher wants t o know students’
error in language learning, he or she must do an analysis. This analysis can be useful  for  the  teacher  what  errors  which  are  made  by  students.  By  knowing
errors,  the  teachers  can  improve  their  teaching  quality  in  order  that  the  errors can be minimized.
4. The Steps of Error Analysis
When  the  teachers  know  some  errors  is  made  by  their  students,  Error analysis should be realized to know what is a problem. Therefore, the teachers
should know some steps in error analysis. Based on Fisiak, he said that ―the steps  of  error  analysis  are  collection  of  data,  identification  of  errors,
classification  into  error  types,  statement  of  relative  frequency  of  error  types, identification  of  the  areas  of  difficulty  in  the  target  language,  therapy  or
remedial.‖
11
Collection  of  data  by  students  from  examination  answers  which  the teachers give the exercise. Then, identification of errors which is labeling with
varying degrees of precision depending on the linguistic sophistication brought to bear on the tasks by respecting to the exact nature of the deviation, dangling
preposition, sequencing of tenses.
9
H.  Douglas  Brown,  Principles  of  Language  Learning  and  Teaching,  New  York:Pearson Longman, 2007, p. 259.
10
Rod  Ellis,  The  Study  of  Second  Language  Acquisition, New  York:Oxford  University  Press, 1994, p. 68.
11
Fisiak, op. cit, p. 222.
After  that,  classification  into  error  types.  It  belongs  to  article,  verb forms  etc.  Moreover,  statement  of  relative  frequency  of  error  types  by
accounting  them.  In  addition,  the  teachers  should  identify  of  the  areas  of difficulty in the target language. Finally, when the teachers have known some
errors are made by the students, they make theraphy or remedial drills for the students.
When  the  teachers  want  to  know  students’  error,  they  should  do analysis error. Ellis introduces four steps of error analysis; they are identifying
errors, describing errors, explaining errors, and evaluating errors.
12
Here are the explanation about them.
a. Identifying errors
The first step that must be done is identifying errors. On this step, a writer  identifies  all  errors  which  are  made  by  students.  An  error  can  be
defined by four questions.
13
Firstly, there is the question regarding which variety  of  the  target  language  should  serve  as  the  norm.  Then,  a  second
question concerns the distinction between errors and mistakes. Third,  a  question  concerns  whether  the  error  is  overt  or  covert;
overt  error  is  easy  to  identify  because  there  is  a  clear  deviation  form, covert error is  superficially well-formed but  which do not  mean what  the
learner  intended  them  to  mean.  Finally,  a  question  concern  whether  the analysis should examine only deviations in correctness or also deviation in
appropratness. b.
Describing Errors After  all  errors  have  been  identified,  the  teachers  should  do
describing  errors of  the  students  involves  a  comparison  of  the  students’
idiosyncratic  utterances  with  a  reconstruction  of  those  utterances  in  the target  language.  According  Dulay,  Burt  and  Krashen  said  that  focus
describing  errors  is  in  observable,  surface  and  explanation  of  errors.
14
Based  on  the  statement  above  that  when  the  the  teachers  observe  the
12
Rod  Ellis,  Second  Language  Acquisition,  New  York:Oxford  University  Press,  2003,  pp. 50
—63.
13
Ibid, pp. 50 —52.
14
Ibid, p. 54.
students’  errors,  they  should  describe  the  surface  errors  are  made  by students.
c. Explaining Errors
On this step, a writer explains why students make errors. He finds our  sources  of  error  based  on  error  types  which  are  found.  According
Abbot, He said that the aim of any EA Error of Analysis is to provide a psychological  explanation.Here  is  the  picture  of  psycholinguistic  sources
of errors.
15
Chart 2.1 Psycholinguistic sources of errors
Transfer Competence
Intralingual overgeneralization errors
Unique Errors
Performance Processing problems
Mistake Communication strategies
d. Evaluating Errors
After  knowing  the  sources  the  students  error,  the  teachers  should do  evalua
tion.  According  to  Ellis  that  ―error  evaluation  onvolves  a consideration  of  the  affect  that  errors
have  on  the  persons  addressed.‖
16
The purpose of the error analysis is to help the students learn L2. There is a need to evaluate global errors to minimize errors which are made by the
students. Burt  define
d  that  ―global  errors  as  errors  that  affect  overall sentence  organization.  Examples  are  wrong  word  order,  missing  or
wrongly placed sentence connectors, an d syntactic overgeneralization.‖
17
15
Ibid, p. 58.
16
Ibid, p. 63.
17
Ibid, p. 64.