example errors can useful for students, teacher and syllabus designer to make a good education in the future.
2. Errors versus Mistakes
At  this  point,  Corder  introduces  an  important  distinction  between ―errors‖ and ―mistakes‖.
Mistakes  are  deviations  due  to  performance  factors  such  as  memory limitations  eg  mistakes  in  the  sequence  of  tenses  and  agreement  in  long
sentences,  spelling  pronunciation,  fatigue,  emotional  strain,  etc.  On  the other  hand,  Errors  are  systematic,  consistent  deviances  characteristics  of
the learner’s linguistic system at a given stage of learning.
7
According to James that ―if the students is inlined and able to correct a fault in his or her output, it is assumed that the form he or she selected was not
the one intended, and it shall say that the fault is a mistake. On the other hand, if  the  students  is  unable  or  in  any  way  disinclined  to  make  the  correction,  it
assume  the  form  the  students  used  was  the  one  intended,  and  that  it  is  an error.‖
8
From  explanation  above,  it  is  clear  that  error  and  mistake  are  exactly different.  When  students  make  error,  they  do  not  know  what  is  correct  and
occurs  repeatedly.  Meanwhile,  mistake  can  occur  because  of  slips  of  the tongue,  and  students  can  correct  by  themselves  because  they  know  what  is
correct. For examples of the errors, My brother is more smarter than My sister,
My brother is more smart than My sister, exectera. It is called error because it occurs  repeatedly  when  the  students  do  exercises.  However,  the  teacher  has
taught  the  students.  The  students  still  do  incorrect  in  their  exercise.  In  other side, for examples of the mistakes, My brother is smarter My sister, My brother
is  smarter  than  My  sister.  It  is  called  mistake  because  the  students  only  do incorrect sentence in the first statement. But in the next statement, the students
have known to make correct sentence.
7
Jacek  Fisiak.  Contrastive  Linguistics  and  Language  Teacher,  New  York:Oxford  Pergamon Press,1981, p. 224.
8
Carl James, Errors in Language Learning and Use, New York:Wesley Longman,1998,  pp. 77
—78.
3. The Definition of Error Analysis
To know errors which are made by students, the teachers must do error analysis.  Brown  stated  that
―Error  analysis  is  a  branch  of  applied  linguistics where  the teacher can observe,  analyze and  classify  errors that students  made
to reveal something of the system operating within the learner, led to a surge of study of learners’ errors.‖
9
Then,  Ellis  also  argued  that ―Error Analysis EA was one of the first
method  used  to  investigate  learner  language.  It  achieved  considerable popularity in the 1970s, replacing contrastive analysis.
‖
10
Based on the statements above, when a teacher wants t o know students’
error in language learning, he or she must do an analysis. This analysis can be useful  for  the  teacher  what  errors  which  are  made  by  students.  By  knowing
errors,  the  teachers  can  improve  their  teaching  quality  in  order  that  the  errors can be minimized.
4. The Steps of Error Analysis
When  the  teachers  know  some  errors  is  made  by  their  students,  Error analysis should be realized to know what is a problem. Therefore, the teachers
should know some steps in error analysis. Based on Fisiak, he said that ―the steps  of  error  analysis  are  collection  of  data,  identification  of  errors,
classification  into  error  types,  statement  of  relative  frequency  of  error  types, identification  of  the  areas  of  difficulty  in  the  target  language,  therapy  or
remedial.‖
11
Collection  of  data  by  students  from  examination  answers  which  the teachers give the exercise. Then, identification of errors which is labeling with
varying degrees of precision depending on the linguistic sophistication brought to bear on the tasks by respecting to the exact nature of the deviation, dangling
preposition, sequencing of tenses.
9
H.  Douglas  Brown,  Principles  of  Language  Learning  and  Teaching,  New  York:Pearson Longman, 2007, p. 259.
10
Rod  Ellis,  The  Study  of  Second  Language  Acquisition, New  York:Oxford  University  Press, 1994, p. 68.
11
Fisiak, op. cit, p. 222.