Trace formulas. Modular tools

732 Emmanuel Royer, Jie Wu by the expansion 67 Ls, Sym 2 f Ls, Sym m f z =: + ∞ X n=1 λ 1,z Sym 2 f,Sym m f nn −s . The preceding results imply the Proposition 9. Let N be a squarefree integer, f ∈ H ∗ 2 N ; let ν ≥ 0 and m 0 be integers and z be a complex number. Then λ 1,z Sym 2 f,Sym m f p ν =                    ν X ν ′ =0 τ z p ν ′ λ f p mν ′ p ν ′ −ν if p | N max2,mν X m ′ =0 µ 1,z,ν Sym 2 ,Sym m ,Sym m′ λ f p m ′ if p ∤ N . Moreover, λ 1,z Sym 2 f,Sym m f p ν ≤ τ m+1 |z|+3 p ν µ 1,z,0 Sym 2 ,Sym m ,Sym m′ = δm ′ , 0 µ 1,z,1 Sym 2 ,Sym m ,Sym m′ = zδm ′ , m + δm ′ , 2 µ 1,z,ν Sym 2 ,Sym 2m ,Sym 2m′+1 = 0, and max2,mν X m ′ =0 µ 1,z,ν Sym 2 ,Sym m ,Sym m′ ≤ m + 1 |z| + 2 + ν ν .

2.4. Trace formulas.

In this section, we establish a few mean value results for Dirichlet coefficients of the different L–functions we shall en- counter. Let f ∈ H ∗ 2 N . Denote by ε f N := εSym 1 f the sign of the functional equation satisfied by Ls, f . We have 68 ε f N = −µN √ N λ f N ∈ {−1, 1}. The following trace formula is due to Iwaniec, Luo Sarnak [ILS00, Corollary 2.10]. Lemma 10. Let N ≥ 1 be a squarefree integer and m ≥ 1, n ≥ 1 two integers satisfying m, N = 1 and n, N 2 | N. Then X f ∈H ∗ 2 N ω ∗ f λ f mλ f n = δm, n + OErr Special values of symmetric power L-functions and Hecke eigenvalues 733 with Err := τ N 2 log 2 3N N mn 14 τ 3 [m, n] p n, N log2mnN . We shall need a slightly different version of this trace formula we actually only remove the condition n, N = 1 from [ILS00, Proposition 2.9]. Lemma 11. Let N ≥ 1 be a squarefree integer and m ≥ 1, n ≥ 1 two integers satisfying m, N = 1 and n, N 2 | N. Then X f ∈H ∗ 2 N ω ∗ f [1 + ε f N ] λ f mλ f n = δm, n + OErr with Err := δn, mN √ N + τ N 2 log 2 3N N 34 mn 14 p n, N log2mnN τ 3 [m, n] N 14 + τ [m, n] p n, N . Proof. By Lemma 10, it suffices to prove that X f ∈H ∗ 2 N ω ∗ f ε f N λ f mλ f n ≪ δn, mN √ N + τ N 2 log 2 3N N 34 mn 14 n, N τ [m, n] log2mnN . Since ε f N = −µN √ N λ f N , we shall estimate R := √ N X f ∈H ∗ 2 N ω ∗ f λ f mλ f nλ f N . The multiplicativity relation 30 and equation 31 give R = √ N X f ∈H ∗ 2 N ω ∗ f λ f mλ f n N λ f n N 2 λ f N n N = √ N n N X d |m,n N X f ∈H ∗ 2 N ω ∗ f λ f mn N d 2 λ f N n N . Then, Lemma 10 leads to the result since M N N d 2 = Nn N implies N = n N , m = n N and d = m. We also prove a trace formula implying the Dirichlet coefficients of the symmetric power L-functions. 734 Emmanuel Royer, Jie Wu Lemma 12. Let N be a squarefree integer, m, n, q be nonnegative integers and z be a complex number. Then X f ∈H ∗ 2 N ω ∗ f [1 + ε f N ] λ z Sym m f nλ f q = w z m n, q + OErr with 69 w z m n, q := τ z n N n m N q N p n m N q N Y 1 ≤j≤r X ≤ν ′ j ≤mν j p ν′1 1 ···p ν′r r =q N µ z,ν j Sym m ,Sym ν′ j where n N = r Y j=1 p ν j j , p 1 · · · p j and Err := τ N 2 log 2 3N N 34 n m4 τ m+1 |z| nτ qq 14 log2N nq. The implicit constant is absolute. Proof. Let S := X f ∈H ∗ 2 N ω ∗ f [1 + ε f N ] λ z Sym m f nλ f q. Writing n Q N M N = g 2 h with h squarefree, equation 31 and Proposition 2 give S = τ z n N g X ν ′ i 1≤i≤r ∈X r i=1 [0,mν i ]   r Y j=1 µ z,ν j Sym m ,Sym ν′ j   × X d | „ q N , Q r j=1 p ν′ j j « X f ∈H ∗ 2 N ω ∗ f [1 + ε f N ]λ f hλ f   q N d 2 r Y j=1 p ν ′ j j   . Then, since h | N, Lemma 11 gives S = P + E with P = τ z n N g r Y j=1 mν j X ν ′ j =0 µ z,ν j Sym m ,Sym ν′ j X d | „ q N , Q r j=1 p ν′j j « q N p ν′1 1 ···p ν′r r d 2 =h 1 Special values of symmetric power L-functions and Hecke eigenvalues 735 and E ≪ τ N 2 log 2 3N N 34 n m4 τ |z| n N n m2 N q 14 τ q q 12 N log2N nq g 12 r Y j=1 mν j X ν ′ j =0 µ z,ν j Sym m ,Sym ν′ j . Using 51, we obtain E ≪ τ N 2 log 2 3N N 34 n m4 q 14 τ q log2N nqτ m+1 |z| n. We transform P as the announced principal term since q N p ν ′ 1 1 · · · p ν ′ r r d 2 = h implies p ν ′ 1 1 · · · p ν ′ r r = q N = d and h = 1. Similarly to Lemma 12, we prove the Lemma 13. Let k, N , m, n be positive integers, k even, N squarefree. Let z ∈ C. Then X f ∈H ∗ 2 N ω ∗ f λ 1,z Sym 2 f,Sym m f n = w 1,z 2,m n + O k,m Err with Err := τ N 2 log 2 3N N n max2,mν4 r 1,z 2,m n log2nN where w 1,z 2,m and r 1,z 2,m are the multiplicative functions defined by w 1,z 2,m p ν :=                ν X ν ′ =0 τ z p ν ′ p mν ′ p ν −ν ′ +mν ′ 2 if p | N µ 1,z,ν Sym 2 ,Sym m ,Sym if p ∤ N and r 1,z 2,m p ν :=                ν X ν ′ =0 τ |z| p ν ′ p ν −ν ′ +mν ′ 2 if p | N m+1 |z|+ν+2 ν if p ∤ N . 736 Emmanuel Royer, Jie Wu

2.5. Mean value formula for the central value of Ls, f . Using the

Dokumen yang terkait

AN ALIS IS YU RID IS PUT USAN BE B AS DAL AM P E RKAR A TIND AK P IDA NA P E NY E RTA AN M E L AK U K A N P R AK T IK K E DO K T E RA N YA NG M E N G A K IB ATK AN M ATINYA P AS IE N ( PUT USA N N O MOR: 9 0/PID.B /2011/ PN.MD O)

0 82 16

ANALISIS FAKTOR YANGMEMPENGARUHI FERTILITAS PASANGAN USIA SUBUR DI DESA SEMBORO KECAMATAN SEMBORO KABUPATEN JEMBER TAHUN 2011

2 53 20

EFEKTIVITAS PENDIDIKAN KESEHATAN TENTANG PERTOLONGAN PERTAMA PADA KECELAKAAN (P3K) TERHADAP SIKAP MASYARAKAT DALAM PENANGANAN KORBAN KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS (Studi Di Wilayah RT 05 RW 04 Kelurahan Sukun Kota Malang)

45 393 31

FAKTOR – FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PENYERAPAN TENAGA KERJA INDUSTRI PENGOLAHAN BESAR DAN MENENGAH PADA TINGKAT KABUPATEN / KOTA DI JAWA TIMUR TAHUN 2006 - 2011

1 35 26

A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ON “SPA: REGAIN BALANCE OF YOUR INNER AND OUTER BEAUTY” IN THE JAKARTA POST ON 4 MARCH 2011

9 161 13

Pengaruh kualitas aktiva produktif dan non performing financing terhadap return on asset perbankan syariah (Studi Pada 3 Bank Umum Syariah Tahun 2011 – 2014)

6 101 0

Pengaruh pemahaman fiqh muamalat mahasiswa terhadap keputusan membeli produk fashion palsu (study pada mahasiswa angkatan 2011 & 2012 prodi muamalat fakultas syariah dan hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta)

0 22 0

Pendidikan Agama Islam Untuk Kelas 3 SD Kelas 3 Suyanto Suyoto 2011

4 108 178

ANALISIS NOTA KESEPAHAMAN ANTARA BANK INDONESIA, POLRI, DAN KEJAKSAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 2011 SEBAGAI MEKANISME PERCEPATAN PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA PERBANKAN KHUSUSNYA BANK INDONESIA SEBAGAI PIHAK PELAPOR

1 17 40

KOORDINASI OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN (OJK) DENGAN LEMBAGA PENJAMIN SIMPANAN (LPS) DAN BANK INDONESIA (BI) DALAM UPAYA PENANGANAN BANK BERMASALAH BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG RI NOMOR 21 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN

3 32 52