Research Design METHOD OF THE STUDY

37

CHAPTER III METHOD OF THE STUDY

This chapter is a method of the study. It consists of seven sub-chapters; they are 1 research design, 2 research object, 3 research variables, 4 hypothesis, 5 research instruments, 6 method of collecting data, and 7 method of analyzing data.

3.1 Research Design

The term research design refers to how a researcher puts a research study together to answer a question or a set of questions. Research design works as a systematic plan outlining the study, the researchers methods of compilation, details on how the study will arrive at its conclusions and the limitations of the research Kenneth W. Michael Wills: 1999. Research design is the way or the method researchers gain or collect the data and analyze the data. Data that has been collected by using particular instrument and method of collecting data are analyzed deeply by using method of analyzing the data. A research design is a set of advance decisions that make up the master plan specifying the methods and procedures for collecting and analyzing the needed information Amy Dyslex: 2011. Research design is the guidance or the list of the plan that is used by the researcher to collect and analyze all information that is needed to conduct the research. It is the guidance for the researcher to gain all 38 information that will be used to do research and make the researcher easy to analyze it effectively. This study is a quantitative research which belongs to “True Experimental Design”. Citing Tuckman 1978:130, Saleh 2013 explained about the true experimental design as follows: There are some designs that can be called true experimental design because they provide completely adequate controls for all sources of internal validity. They represent no compromise between experimental design requirements and the nature and reality of the situation in which a study is being undertaken. This study uses “Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design” as the research design. The pretest-posttest control group design is a research design which utilizes two groups in research; they are experimental group and control group. Both groups are given pretest and posttest, however only experimental group receives a treatment X. This research design controls many threats to validity or sources of bias. Citing Tuckman 1978:132, Saleh 2013 stated by utilization of a control group, which has all the same experiences as the experimental group other than the experience of the treatment itself, this design controls for history, maturation, and regression. Below is the diagram of pretest-posttest control group design: 39 E O 1 X O 2 C O 3 O 4 E : Experimental group C : Control group O 1 : experimental group pretest O 2 : experimental group posttest O 3 : control group posttest O 4 : control group posttest X : treatment Figure 3.1 Diagram of pretest-posttest control group design As can be seen from the diagram, two groups are employed in this design; one group, the experimental group, receives a treatment X while the second group, does not. Both groups are given a pretest and a posttest. Because this study is a comparison study, which has the purpose to compare which is more effective to teach recount text between CIRC and JIGSAW, the design will be modified as can be seen on the diagram below. E O 1 X 1 O 2 C O 3 X 2 O 4 E : Experimental group C : Control group O 1 : experimental group pretest O 2 : experimental group posttest O 3 : control group posttest O 4 : control group posttest X1 : Treatment CIRC X2: Treatment JIGSAW Figure 3.2 Diagram of pretest-posttest control group design with two treatments 40 This design as can be seen from the diagram also gives the treatment X2 for the control group. The treatment in this design is given for the two groups; X1 is the treatment for the experimental group that is CIRC, while X2 is the treatment for the control group that is JIGSAW.

3.2 Research Object

Dokumen yang terkait

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STUDENTS’ READING INTEREST, VOCABULARY MASTERY AND THEIR READING ABILITY ON DESCRIPTIVE TEXT (A Correlational Study on the Eighth Grade Students in Kecamatan Banjar Pandeglang, Academic Year 2012/2013)

0 15 120

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256

THE USE OF MEME COMIC AS MEDIA TO TEACH SPOOF TEXT An Experimental Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Kutowinangun, Kebumen in the Academic Year of 20152016

1 40 127

THE USE OF JIGSAW TECHNIQUE IN IMPROVING STUDENT’S ACHIEVEMENT IN READING RECOUNT TEXT AT SMK N 1 NEGRIKATON

0 8 52

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN VOCABULARY MASTERY AND STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY AT SMA N 1 SIDOMULYO

2 24 56

THE READING COMPREHENSION IN DESCRIPTIVE TEXT OF THE SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF MTs NEGERI GEMBONG PATITAUGHT BY USING CIRC (COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING ANDCOMPOSITION) METHOD IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 20112012

0 0 17

USING PERSONAL JOURNAL WRITING TO TEACH WRITING RECOUNT TEXT AT SMA MUHAMMADIYAH 1 PONTIANAK RESEARCH ARTICLE

0 1 9

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GROUP-DISCUSSION USING WORD WALL TO TEACH READING VIEWED FROM STUDENTS’ INTEREST (An Experimental Study in SD N 01 Gawanan and SD N 01 Tohudan Colomadu Karanganyar in the 20082009 Academic Year)

0 0 131

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING PRE-QUESTIONING TECHNIQUE TO TEACH READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXT (An Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Student at SMP N 2 Mejobo Kudus in the Academic Year 20172018) By: AGHITA OKTAVIANA

0 1 14

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING A1 SpeechTRON AS A MEDIUM TO TEACH PRONUNCIATION OF –ed ENDING REGULAR VERBS IN THE NARRATIVE TEXTS (An Experimental Research at The Tenth Graders of SMA Unggulan Nurul Islami Semarang In The Academic Year Of 20112012)

0 2 107