23
Source of Evidence Strengths
Weaknesses human observers
Participant-observation Same
as for
direct observation
Insightful into
personal behaviour and motives
Same as for direct observation
Bias due to participants’ manipulation of events
Physical artefacts Insightful
into cultural
features Insightful into technical
operation Selectivity
availability
Source: Yin 2009
B. Research Setting
The researcher conducted the study during the internship program in school from January to May 2015. The classroom observations were conducted in
SMK Putra Tama Bantul, from March to April 2015. The school is located on 2
Mgr. Alb. Sugiyopranoto St. Bantul, Yogyakarta. The interviews were done in three different sessions. The first interview was done on Friday, April 10
th
, 2015. The second interview was on Saturday, April 18
th
, 2015, and the last interview was on Thursday, May 7
th
, 2015.
C. Research Participants
There were two kinds of participants in this study. The first participant was the students of SMK Putra Tama. Those students were taught English by the
student teachers of ELESP of Sanata Dharma University who conducted the internship program in school in academic year 20142015. The students were X
grade students from four different classes. The classes were Accounting, Broadcasting, Marketing, and Automotive. These participants were addressed to
24 be the subjects in answering the first research problem related to the behaviour of
the students in the classroom. The second participant was the student teachers who conducted the
internship program in school at the SMK Putra Tama. The participants were addressed to answer both research problems related to the student
s’ behaviours in the classrooms and its influences on their motivation to become schoolteachers.
Purposive sampling was taken with the homogenous sampling method as the best approach to provide maximum insight and understanding of the study. There were
three samplings involving the three student teachers who conducted the internship program in school in SMK Putra Tama.
D. Instrument and Data Gathering Technique
The sources of the data in this study were the participants. Ary et al. 2010 stated that the human investigator is the primary instrument for the
gathering and analysing the data p. 424. In this case, the investigator was the researcher. The fieldwork methods for the study were observation in the
classroom and interview to the student teachers. In order to find a depth of understanding about the data, the researcher used two instruments: the classroom
observations, and the interview. The first instrument was the classroom observations. This instrument
helped the researcher to see directly how the students behaved during the learning teaching process. The researcher observed four classes of SMK Putra Tama. They
were done from March to April 2015 with four periods of classroom observation
25 in different classes. The researcher was present in the classroom, observing the
students during the classroom activities, taking notes of the students’ behaviours,
and additionally, the researcher also took some pictures and videos. The second instrument was the interview. This instrument is the most
widely used and the basic method for obtaining the data in this study. It helped the researcher to understand the experiences of the student teachers. The researcher
interviewed three student teachers who conducted their internship program in school in SMK Putra Tama. The interview was a semi-structured interview
consisted of ten major questions.
E. Data Analysis Techniques
This study used two data gathering methods. The first method was classroom observation and the second method was the interview. The data
analysis was the combination of these two methods. The first data were related to the student
s’ behaviours found in the classrooms which were classified into two major behaviours: productive and disruptive behaviour. The data were found from
the classroom observations, where the researcher observed directly how the students behaved during the learning activities and from the information of the
student teachers in the interviews. The second data were related to the theories of motivation and its effects.
The analysis was to find the influence of the student s’ behaviours on the student
teachers’ motivation to become schoolteachers. The results were classified into three major influences: positive, neutral, and negative. The positive influence
means that the student teacher shows more than three effects of motivation in the
