25 in different classes. The researcher was present in the classroom, observing the
students during the classroom activities, taking notes of the students’ behaviours,
and additionally, the researcher also took some pictures and videos. The second instrument was the interview. This instrument is the most
widely used and the basic method for obtaining the data in this study. It helped the researcher to understand the experiences of the student teachers. The researcher
interviewed three student teachers who conducted their internship program in school in SMK Putra Tama. The interview was a semi-structured interview
consisted of ten major questions.
E. Data Analysis Techniques
This study used two data gathering methods. The first method was classroom observation and the second method was the interview. The data
analysis was the combination of these two methods. The first data were related to the student
s’ behaviours found in the classrooms which were classified into two major behaviours: productive and disruptive behaviour. The data were found from
the classroom observations, where the researcher observed directly how the students behaved during the learning activities and from the information of the
student teachers in the interviews. The second data were related to the theories of motivation and its effects.
The analysis was to find the influence of the student s’ behaviours on the student
teachers’ motivation to become schoolteachers. The results were classified into three major influences: positive, neutral, and negative. The positive influence
means that the student teacher shows more than three effects of motivation in the
26 learning teaching activities. It means that the student teacher shows the interest in
teaching. The neutral influence means that there are three effect of motivation but the student teacher is not really sure whether shehe will become a teacher or not.
The negative influence means that there is no effect of motivation shown during the teaching practices.
After the data were collected, the researcher analysed the data. The data were analysed using coding. According to Moleong 2013, coding is a process to
make the categorization and to describe the implication and the details from each category. It was done in four steps:
1. The interview data which were in the form of recordings were transcribed
into a written form in three columns. The first column was the original speech. It consisted of the questions from the researcher as the interviewer,
and the answers of the student teachers as the participants. In this part, the researcher transcribed every single word given by the participants.
2. The researcher made the first coding in the second column. The first
coding summarized the information given by the participants. 3.
In the last column, the researcher made the categorization of the first coding. The categorization was made based on the points related to the
problems in this study. 4.
The categories from the coding then were classified based on the research problems. They were combined with the findings from the classroom
observation data. The categories were used to describe the finding in chapter IV.
