General Findings GENERAL FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

S1 : Iya udah banyak tau kosakata jadi gampang. Since we already know many new vocabularies, it becomes easier. IT 9, Thursday, 30 th April 2015 Referring to the observation results and interview transcripts collected during the implementation, the teacher and the collaborator agreed that the action had successfully improved the students’ attitude towards reading lesson and the students’ reading comprehension ability.

D. General Findings

In relation to the evaluation of cycle I and II of the research, the implementation of Experience-Text-Relationship method in improving the students’ reading comprehension was successful. The improvement happened during the implementation was presented in the table below. Table 4: The Improvement after the Implementation No. Before the Implementation After the Implementation Cycle I Cycle II 1. The students were less interested and enthusiastic in reading classes. Only a few dominant students who often participated actively. Some students were interested while the teacher inserted some games in the teaching and learning process. However a group of students did not pay attention well while the teacher was not around or was giving explanation to the other students. The number of students who participated in learning process increased showed when the teacher made an interaction, many students active responding. Various activities and games made the students more interested and enthusiastic in joining the lesson. Moreover, providing a reward for the students made them more motivated to participate actively. 2. The activities rarely involved the students to activate their background knowledge. Providing pictures and picture series helped the students to activate their background knowledge. Experience phase in ETR method gave a chance to the students to share their prior knowledge and experience related to the text. The students could think more critically when they were given a picture or a title of a particular story. Especially when a topic given was quite familiar for them, they could explore their prior knowledge better. 3. The students were not familiar with a particular reading strategy. Some students started to know ETR method although they still needed a lot of guidance in applying the method. While some others needed more explanation what they should do in each step, and how to relate between experience and the content of the text. Most of the students had better understanding of ETR method and each steps of it. The use of graphic organizer facilitated them to draw relationship between what they know experience and the content of the text read. 4. The students faced difficulties in understanding the meaning of some difficult unfamiliar words. As the result they depended on dictionary too much to find the meaning of the words. Some students did try to understand the meaning of some words by looking at the context and surrounding sentence, but some students were less effort to do so and asked to look in the dictionary. Most of the students were accustomed to understand the meaning based on the context. As the result, their knowledge of vocabularies increased. 5. The students faced difficulties to comprehend a text. Some students needed long time to comprehend a text and to find a main idea of the text. Steps of ETR method helped them to understand the content of the text, but they still need a lot of assistance. As the students got better understanding of implementation of ETR method, their ability in comprehending text also improved. In addition, by the time their knowledge of vocabularies increased, comprehending a text become easier. In connection to the table 4, the teacher found that experience-text- relationship method improved the students’ behavior towards teaching reading as well as the students’ ability in comprehending texts. This notion was in line with the previous researches conducted by Jarmianik, J. 2013 and Samosir, D.N. 2013. Jarmianik 2013 proved in her research that the result of the study indicated that ETR method had improved students’ reading comprehension and the class situation. The findings by Samosir 2013 also indicated that there was significant improvement of students’ reading comprehension through the implementation of ETR method. This research was carried out in two cycles. During the implementation of the actions, the researcher also used accompanying activities and supporting teaching aids which were useful and meaningful to provide in the class. They indeed played an important role in succeeding the process of the implementation of the actions. As the result, the implementation of ETR method was not only effective in improving the students’ reading comprehension, but also the students’ behavior in teaching reading and the class situation. The general findings of the actions were described as follows. Firstly, experience-text-relationship is able to improve the students’ participation and enthusiasm towards reading lesson. Various steps of the method encouraged them to think and share their opinion related to the topic. It gave the students chances to participate and have interaction with the teacher as well as the other students. In consequence, the class situation became livelier. Moreover the topic discussed was selected based on relevance and familiarity with the students, so it made them more confident while discussing and exploring the topic in the class. This notion was supported by Au 1979 claiming that ETR method is a discussion-based activity in which a discussion refers to interactive communication between a teacher and students talking about a particular topic. Additionally, various activities, games, and reward increased the students’ interest and motivation. They enjoyed joining the lesson as they experienced a new way of teaching. Secondly, experience-text-relationship is able to improve students’ skill in using background knowledge. As stated by Carrell et al. 1988, experience-text- relationship method emphasizes in reading for meaning. This method can help students to activate background knowledge to draw meaning of a text that is useful for text comprehension. During the learning process, the students had got sufficient practice in sharing their experience and background knowledge as a bridge to connect their knowledge with the content of the text. Experience phase enabled the students to think more actively and critically before they read the text. Furthermore, experience-text-relationship is able to enhance students’ knowledge of vocabulary. As stated by Nunan 2003 that one of the pricnciples in teaching reading is to build a strong vocabulary base. He adds that basic vocabulary should be taught explicitly to the students and they should be taught to use context to effectively guess meanings of less frequent vocabulary. Previously, the students depended too much on dictionary. When they found unfamiliar words in a text, they just looked in the dictionary to find the meaning. However, it was not effective because the students would only know the meaning of the words at that time but they would easily forget it in the future as they did not intend to understand the meaning of the words. By using ETR method, the students were directed to understand the meaning based on the context by looking at surrounding sentences. The students were given chances to make use of their background knowledge related to the text to guess the meaning. Lastly, experience-text-relationship is able to improve the students’ reading ability. Since ETR method provides opportunities for students to explore many dimensions of the story and to integrate features of it with their existing store of knowledge Au, 1979, it helps the students to develop their reading comprehension. Previously, the students faced some problems in comprehending a text, but ETR method enabled them activating their background knowledge in which it led them to have a prior prediction related to the text that they were going to discussed. As the result, the students found it easier to understand the content of the text and to obtain specific information from the text. It also enabled them to compare and contrast the result of the story with their prior prediction which led them to summary and make conclusion. The improvement of the students’ reading comprehension was also supported by the result of reading test scores. The following table shows the result of the pre-test and post-test. Table 5: The Result of the Pre-test and Post-test Descriptive Statistics N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Pretest 34 33.00 90.00 66.5294 14.82061 Posttest 34 50.00 97.00 77.4118 12.34876 Valid N listwise 34 Table 5 shows that the mean score of post-test is higher than the mean score of pre-test. Previously in the pre-test, the mean score is only 66,52 while in the post-test it becomes 77,41. The mean score increases 10,89 points which means that there is significant improvement in the students’ reading comprehension ability.

CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS, SUGGESTIONS