Homogeneity of Data Analysis of Data

No Students X Students Y X-MX Y-MY X-MX 2 Y-MY 2 3 16 8 -4.13 -3.6 17.0569 12.96 4 20 8 -0.13 -3.6 0.0169 12.96 5 16 8 -4.13 -3.6 17.0569 12.96 6 32 28 11.87 16.4 140.8969 268.96 7 8 20 -12.13 8.4 147.1369 70.56 8 36 8 15.87 -3.6 251.8569 12.96 9 36 16 15.87 4.4 251.8569 19.36 10 16 12 -4.13 0.4 17.0569 0.16 11 20 8 -0.13 -3.6 0.0169 12.96 12 12 8 -8.13 -3.6 66.0969 12.96 13 16 12 -4.13 0.4 17.0569 0.16 14 16 12 -4.13 0.4 17.0569 0.16 15 12 16 -8.13 4.4 66.0969 19.36 16 24 4 3.87 -7.6 14.9769 57.76 17 28 12 7.87 0.4 61.9369 0.16 18 28 8 7.87 -3.6 61.9369 12.96 19 24 3.87 -11.6 14.9769 134.56 20 24 16 3.87 4.4 14.9769 19.36 21 16 8 -4.13 -3.6 17.0569 12.96 22 16 16 -4.13 4.4 17.0569 19.36 23 12 8 -8.13 -3.6 66.0969 12.96 24 8 16 -12.13 4.4 147.1369 19.36 25 16 8 -4.13 -3.6 17.0569 12.96 26 36 16 15.87 4.4 251.8569 19.36 27 8 8 -12.13 -3.6 147.1369 12.96 28 28 16 7.87 4.4 61.9369 19.36 29 24 16 3.87 4.4 14.9769 19.36 30 20 8 -0.13 -3.6 0.0169 12.96 Σ 604 348 1935.467 843.2 Mean 20.133333 11.6 64.51556667 28.1066667 Based on the data from the table 4.9 , the statistical calculation was done in the following steps: 1. Determining mean of variable X, with formula: M x = = = 20.13 2. D etermining mean of variable Y, with formula: M y = = = 11.6 3. Determining standard of deviation score of variable X, with formula: = = = 8.03 4. Determining standard of deviation score of variable Y, with formula: = = = 5.30 5. Determining standard error mean of variable X, with formula: = = = = 1.49 6. Determining standard error mean of variable Y, with formula: = = = = 0.98 7. Determining standard error of different mean of variable X and mean of variable Y, with formula: = 1.12 8. Determining t o with formula: 9. Determining degree of freedom df, with formula: = 30 + 30 – 2 = 60 – 2 = 58 10. Determining t table , with formula: = t 0.05, 58 = 1,672 see the Math table of significance Tabel 4.10 Math Table of Significance Pr df

0.25 0.50

0.10 0.20

0.05 0.10

0.025 0.050

0.01 0.02

0.005 0.010 0.001 0.002 41 0.68052 1.30254 1.68288 2.01954 2.42080 2.70118 3.3012 42 0.68038 1.30204 1.68195 2.01808 2.41847 2.69807 3.2959 43 0.68024 1.30155 1.68107 2.01669 2.41625 2.69510 3.2908 44 0.68011 1.30109 1.68023 2.01537 2.41413 2.69228 3.2860 45 0.67998 1.30065 1.67943 2.01410 2.41212 2.68959 3.2814 46 0.67986 1.30023 1.67866 2.01290 2.41019 2.68701 3.2771 47 0.67975 1.29982 1.67793 2.01174 2.40835 2.68456 3.2729 48 0.67964 1.29944 1.67722 2.01063 2.40658 2.68220 3.2689 49 0.67953 1.29907 1.67655 2.00958 2.40489 2.67995 3.2650 50 0.67943 1.29871 1.67591 2.00856 2.40327 2.67779 3.2614 51 0.67933 1.29837 1.67528 2.00758 2.40172 2.67572 3.2578 52 0.67924 1.29805 1.67469 2.00665 2.40022 2.67373 3.2545 53 0.67915 1.29773 1.67412 2.00575 2.39879 2.67182 3.2512 54 0.67906 1.29743 1.67356 2.00488 2.39741 2.66998 3.2481 55 0.67898 1.29713 1.67303 2.00404 2.39608 2.66822 3.2451 56 0.67890 1.29685 1.67252 2.00324 2.39480 2.66651 3.2422 57 0.67882 1.29658 1.67203 2.00247 2.39357 2.66487 3.2394 58 0.67874 1.29632 1.67155 2.00172 2.39238 2.66329 3.2368 59 0.67867 1.29607 1.67109 2.00100 2.39123 2.66176 3.2342 60 0.67860 1.29582 1.67065 2.00030 2.39012 2.66028 3.2317 61 0.67853 1.29558 1.67022 1.99962 2.38905 2.65886 3.2293 62 0.67847 1.29536 1.66980 1.99897 2.38801 2.65748 3.2269 63 0.67840 1.29513 1.66940 1.99834 2.38701 2.65615 3.2247 64 0.67834 1.29492 1.66901 1.99773 2.38604 2.65485 3.2225 65 0.67828 1.29471 1.66864 1.99714 2.38510 2.65360 3.2204 66 0.67823 1.29451 1.66827 1.99656 2.38419 2.65239 3.2183 67 0.67817 1.29432 1.66792 1.99601 2.38330 2.65122 3.2163 68 0.67811 1.29413 1.66757 1.99547 2.38245 2.65008 3.2144 69 0.67806 1.29394 1.66724 1.99495 2.38161 2.64898 3.2126 70 0.67801 1.29376 1.66691 1.99444 2.38081 2.64790 3.2107 71 0.67796 1.29359 1.66660 1.99394 2.38002 2.64686 3.2090 72 0.67791 1.29342 1.66629 1.99346 2.37926 2.64585 3.2073 73 0.67787 1.29326 1.66600 1.99300 2.37852 2.64487 3.2056 74 0.67782 1.29310 1.66571 1.99254 2.37780 2.64391 3.2040 75 0.67778 1.29294 1.66543 1.99210 2.37710 2.64298 3.2024 76 0.67773 1.29279 1.66515 1.99167 2.37642 2.64208 3.2009 77 0.67769 1.29264 1.66488 1.99125 2.37576 2.64120 3.1994 78 0.67765 1.29250 1.66462 1.99085 2.37511 2.64034 3.1980 79 0.67761 1.29236 1.66437 1.99045 2.37448 2.63950 3.1966 80 0.67757 1.29222 1.66412 1.99006 2.37387 2.63869 3.1952 The t t value of df 58 at the degrees of significance 0.05 is 1.672. Based on the calculation and table above, it can be seen that t o is higher than t t because 7.62 1.672.

C. Test of Hypothesis

After obtaining the data which have been calculated by using t-test, the writer used the data to prove the hypothesis. The statistical hypothesis of this research can be seen as: t o ≥ t t : the alternative hypothesis H a is accepted and the null hypothesis H o is rejected. It means that there is a significant effect after suggestopedia method was used for students’ vocabulary mastery. t o t t : the alternative hypothesis H a is rejected and the null hypothesis H o is accepted. It means that there is no significant effect after suggestopedia method was used for students’ vocabulary mastery. By comparing the value of t o = 7.62 and t t = 1.672, the data calculated using statistic show that t o is higher than t t . Hence, the alternative hypothesis H a is accepted and the null hypothesis H o is rejected. It means that there is significant diff erence between students’ vocabulary mastery using suggestopedia method and students’ vocabulary mastery without using suggestopedia method.

D. Discussion

The data used on this study were taken from the students’ vocabulary achievement of pre-test and post-test in experimental and controlled class, which were consisted of 30 students for each class. Furthermore, the mean score of pre-test in experimental class and controlled class were 58.67 and 59.20 while the mean score of post-test in experimental class and controlled class were 78.80 and 70.80. In addition, the mean of gain score in experimental class was 20.13 with the highest score was 36 and the lowest score was 8. Meanwhile, the mean of gain score in controlled class was 11.6 with the highest score was 28 and the lowest score was 0. It means that the mean of gain score in experimental class was higher than in controlled class. Before the hypothesis being tested, the writer had to test the normality and homogeneity of the data. The significance value of normality in experimental class was 0.200 for pre-test and 0.196 for post-test. Besides, the significance value of normality in controlled class was 0.200 for pre-test and 0.200 for post-test. All of the significance values were higher than 0.05 which means that the data were normally distributed. It means that there was balance distribution between students who get low, middle and high score. In homogeneity test, the significance value of pre-test in experiment class and controlled class was 0.185 while the significance value of post-test in experiment class and controlled class was 0.520. This result shows that the significance value of experiment and controlled class was homogeneous because it is higher than 0.05. After getting the data which were normal and homogeneous, the last calculation was testing the hypothesis. The writer used t-test formula in the significance degree α of 5. In the table of significance, it was known that on the df 58 and the degree of significance 5, the value of degree significance t t was 1.672. In addition, the result showed that 7.62 t-test t o 1.672 t-table t t . It can be concluded that t-test was higher than t-table. For this reason, the null hypothesis H o was rejected and the alternative hypothesis H a was accepted. It means there was a significant difference between students’ vocabulary mastery using suggestopedia method and students’ vocabulary mastery without using suggestopedia method. In other word, the using of suggestoepdia method is effective to improve students’ vocabulary mastery at eighth grade students of SMPN 166 Jakarta.

E. Limitiation

After the method was proved that is effective on students’ vocabulary mastery, the writer would like to mention some limitations that this research faced during the treatment process. a. The classroom condition. Suggestopedia need a comfortable classroom while the classrooms in SMP N 166 Jakarta were not comfortable since there were no Air Conditioners AC. Moreover, the clasrooms’ wall should be soundproof so that the classroom next door was not disturbed by the noise of the classroom with suggestopedia method. b. The media The school did not provide enough media such as poster, pictures, and speakers. Therefore, the teacher must prepare himherself. c. The students Suggestopedia is considered to be a new method. Therefore, the students were not familiar with this method. As a result, it was hard to make the students keep steady. In fact, suggestopedia need a calmness and relaxed feeling, so the students must be calm and relax also.

Dokumen yang terkait

A Descriptive Study on Grammatical Errors of the Eighth Grade Students' Narrative Text Writing at SMPN 1 Wuluhan Jember in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

0 6 3

The Effect of Using Puzzle on the Eighth Grade Students’ Vocabulary Achievement at SMPN I4 Jember in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

0 6 3

The Effect of Using Roundtable Technique on the Eighth Grade Students' Writing Achievement at SMPN 1 Wuluhan Jember in the 2014/2015 Academic Year

0 4 4

Grammatical Error Analysis of the Eighth Grade Students in Writing Descriptive Text at SMP Negeri 1 Jember in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

1 7 3

The Effectiveness of Using Games Towards Students' Vocabulary Mastery (A Qusai-Experimental Study at Eighth Grade of SMP Darussalam, Pondok Labu, Jakarta)

0 6 98

The Effectiveness Of Using The Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) Technique Towards Students’ Understanding Of The Simple Past Tense (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Trimulia, Jakarta Selatan)

1 8 117

The Effectiveness of Using Card Games Technique in Teaching Vocabulary (A Quasi Experimental Study at the Seventh Grade of SMP Negeri 18 Tangerang)

1 4 125

The Effectiveness Of Using English Comics Strips In Teaching Writing Of Narrative Text; A Quasi-Experimental Research at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Islam Al-Ikhlas in the Academic Year 2013/2014.

1 7 117

The Effectiveness of Using Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) in Teaching Reading of Narrative Text, (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Second Year Students of SMPN I Pakuhaji)

0 10 0

The Effect of Peer-Assessment Method towards Students' Writing of Recount Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Tenth Grade Students of SMA Negeri 11 Tangerang Selatan year 2015/2016)

0 3 72