53
VERY GOOD :
11 students 45.83
GOOD :
5 students 20.83
FAIR :
4 students 16.67
POOR :
4 students 16.67
TOTAL :
24 students 100.00
This study found 247 grammatical complex sentences type one. It was nearly 80 of all written sentences in this type. More specifically, this study also
found out that eleven of twenty four participants obtained “very good,” while five participants obtained “good,” leaving “fair” and “poor,” each of which was
obtained by four students. Even, four participants of those obtaining “very good” obtained an excellent result with zero mistakes.
From the result, the writer could state that students’ mastery on complex sentence type one is relatively good enough.
4. Students’ mastery on complex sentence type two
The overall findings about students’ mastery of complex sentences type two could be observed in the following table.
Table 4.4: Sentences containing finite and non-finite adjective clause
Doc. Total of
Correct Incorrect
Grade No
Adj. Clause
Number Number
1 10
8 80.0
2 20.0
Very Good 2
12 10
83.3 2
16.7 Very Good
3 14
13 92.9
1 7.1
Very Good 4
9 5
55.6 4
44.4 Poor
5 14
10 71.4
4 28.6
Good 6
6 5
83.3 1
16.7 Very Good
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
54
Doc. Total of
Correct Incorrect
Grade No
Adj. Clause
Number Number
7 25
23 92.0
2 8.0
Very Good 8
12 7
58.3 5
41.7 Poor
9 22
14 63.6
8 36.4
Fair 10
11 7
63.6 4
36.4 Fair
11 19
14 73.7
5 26.3
Good 12
10 8
80.0 2
20.0 Very Good
13 7
7 100.0
0.0 Very Good
14 13
7 53.8
6 46.2
Poor 15
10 7
70.0 3
30.0 Good
16 17
16 94.1
1 5.9
Very Good 17
5 4
80.0 1
20.0 Very Good
18 10
6 60.0
4 40.0
Fair 19
8 8
100.0 0.0
Very Good 20
9 5
55.6 4
44.4 Poor
21 10
7 70.0
3 30.0
Good 22
16 14
87.5 2
12.5 Very Good
23 7
6 85.7
1 14.3
Very Good 24
11 11
100.0 0.0
Very Good
TOT 287
222 77.4
65 22.6
VERY GOOD :
13 students
54.17 GOOD
: 4
students 16.67
FAIR :
3 students
12.50 POOR
: 4
students 16.67
TOTAL :
24 students
The table above showed that students’ mastery on complex sentences type two could still be considered good for averagely, 77.4 of all the written
sentences were grammatical. The number of those obtaining “very good”, which was thirteen, was also higher than that of complex sentences type one, which was
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
55 eleven. Three participants of those thirteen even made zero mistakes, getting
excellent “very good” grade. Then, four students obtained “good” and three students obtained “fair”. Again, four students obtained “poor” while more than
half of all participants obtained relatively satisfying results.
5. Students’ mastery on complex sentence type three
The overall findings about students’ mastery of complex sentences type three could be observed in the following table.
Table 4.5: Sentences containing finite and non-finite adverb clause
Doc. Total of
Correct Incorrect
Grade No
Adverb Clause
Number Number
1 8
6 75
2 25
Good 2
10 8
80 2
20 Very Good
3 12
11 92
1 8
Very Good 4
12 8
67 4
33 Fair
5 19
16 84
3 16
Very Good 6
9 8
89 1
11 Very Good
7 9
8 89
1 11
Very Good 8
12 9
75 3
25 Good
9 8
6 75
2 25
Good 10
7 4
57 3
43 Poor
11 6
5 83
1 17
Very Good 12
10 8
80 2
20 Very Good
13 10
8 80
2 20
Very Good 14
13 9
69 4
31 Fair
15 10
3 30
7 70
Poor 16
12 8
67 4
33 Fair
17 10
9 90
1 10
Very Good 18
6 5
83 1
17 Very Good
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
56
Doc. Total of
Correct Incorrect
Grade No
Adverb Clause
Number Number
19 13
11 85
2 15
Very Good 20
9 6
67 3
33 Fair
21 5
3 60
2 40
Fair 22
8 5
63 3
38 Fair
23 13
9 69
4 31
Fair 24
20 19
95 1
5 Very Good
TOT 251
192 76.5
59 23.5
VERY GOOD :
12 students
50.00 GOOD
: 3
students 12.50
FAIR :
7 students
29.17 POOR
: 2
students 8.33
TOTAL :
24 students
According to the result of the document analysis presented in the table above, 192 sentences of 251 sentences were grammatical. The number was 76.5
of all sentences written. Even though at glance, this percentage is lower than that of the previous types of complex sentences, only two students of twenty four
obtained “poor”. Exactly half of the students obtained “very good” while three students obtained “good”. No participant made zero mistakes in this type of
complex sentences. Then, the number of students who obtained “fair,” which was only seven, became a considerable numbers of minorities. Yet, overall, students’
mastery on this type of complex sentence is good enough.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
57
6. Students’ mastery on complex sentence type four
