The Result of Post Observation The Result of Questionnaire

difficulty item and discriminating power to identify the test was used or not in the pre-test, posttest I and posttest II. Here, the writer used quantitative descriptive technique to analyze the data. The writer described the students’ reading score in pre-test, post-test I and post-test II in the table below: Table 4.3 The Students’ Reading Score of Pre-Test, Post-Test I, Post-Test II No Students Number LP Pretest Posttest 1 Posttest 2 1 1 L 55 50 60 2 2 P 60 70 85 3 3 L 45 65 70 4 4 L 50 50 65 5 5 P 70 80 85 6 6 P 55 60 70 7 7 L 40 55 65 8 8 P 55 55 70 9 9 L 50 50 70 10 10 P 70 75 85 11 11 L 45 55 70 12 12 L 50 60 65 13 13 L 55 50 60 14 14 L 60 75 80 15 15 L 55 75 75 16 16 L 50 50 60 17 17 P 60 60 70 18 18 P 65 65 70 19 19 P 60 70 75 20 20 P 70 70 80 21 21 P 50 60 70 22 22 P 50 60 70 23 23 L 50 75 85 The Result 1270 1435 1655 Mean _ ∑x X = ── n y = 5.21 y1 = 62.39 y2 = 71.95 : The student who passed the KKM 70 Based on the data above, the writer gave bold numerical score to students who passed KKM 70, there are 3 students who passed KKM in Pre-Test, 8 students in post-test I and 17 students in Post-Test II. The writer also concluded the lowest score in pre-test was 40, 50 in post-test I and post-test II was 60. In numerical the data, the writer calculates the student mean of the score, calculates the class percentage and also calculates the percentage of the achievement score from pre-test, post-test I and post-test II.

1. Pre-test

The mean score of the pretest was computed such following: _ ∑x X = ── N _ 1270 X = ─── 23 _ X = 55.21 Based on that computation, the mean score of the class in pre- test before implementation the CAR was 55.21. On the other side, to know the class percentage who passed the KKM using the formula as: F P = ── X 100 N 3 P = ── X 100 23 P = 13.04 Based on the numerical data above, it is showed there are 3 students who pass KKM score 70, and there are 20 students have got below of KKM score. It means that only 13.04 who pass KKM score 70. From the percentage above, it is shown the achievement students’ reading at VIII grade SMP Bakti Mulya 400 Jakarta is still low. It could be seen from the diagram below: Figure 4.1 The Result of Student’s Score in Pretest

2. Post-test I

After scoring the pretest in preliminary, the writer calculated the result of posttest 1 in the second meeting of cycle I. It was to know the improvement from the pretest to posttest 1 result. However to measure that improvement, it was needed to know the mean score of the class by using the formula as: _ ∑x X = ── N 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 less 70 score 70 above 70 Pretest

Dokumen yang terkait

Applying Think-aloud Technique in Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (Quasi Experimental Study of Tenth Grade Students of SMK Bhakti 17 Jagakarsa)

0 11 119

The Correlation Between Students’ Mastery In Vocabulary And Their Reading Comprehension Skill Of Descriptive Text

1 10 77

The Effectiveness Of Using Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) Techniques in Teaching Reading

1 16 116

The Effectiveness of Collaborative Learning in Improving Students’ Abililty in Reading Descriptive Text (A Pre-Experimental Study of the Seventh Grade Students of SMP Pelita Harapan, South Jakarta).

0 6 103

The Effectiveness of Numbered Heads Together Technique (NHT) Toward Students’ Reading Ability on Descriptive Text A Quasi Experimental Study at the Second Grade of SMPN 2 Tangerang Selatan in Academic Year 2013/2014

1 9 128

The Effectiveness of Jigsaw Technique toward Students' Reading Comprehension of Recount Text

0 3 133

The Effect Of Using K-W-L Chart Technique On Students' Reading Comprehension Of Descriptive Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study At the Eighth Grade Of MTs Darul Hikmah Pamulang In The 2015/2016 Academic Year)

0 3 152

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION ON DESCRIPTIVE TEXT THROUGH COMIC STRIPS

0 0 11

TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION ON DESCRIPTIVE TEXT THROUGH COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION (CIRC) METHOD

0 0 10

1 THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RECIPROCAL TEACHING IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION OF DESCRIPTIVE TEXT

0 0 9