Classification of Illocutionary Acts

which includes attempting by the speaker to get the hearer to do something. For instance “please, bring me the salt”. They may be very modest attempts as when the speaker invites you to do it or suggest that you do it, or they may be very fierce attempts as when the speaker insists that you do it. Like requests and commands have the things-to-words direction of fit. There are six kinds of acts belong to this category, such as : ordering, commanding, daring, defying, challenging, commending. 3. Commissive Commissive then are those illocutionary acts whose point is to commit the speaker again in varying degrees to some future course of action. Searle 1979 proposed that there are two main verbs categorized into this class, they are “promise” and “offers” but there are others that belong to promise group like vow, pledge, etc. the deep structure of commissive acts is the same with the directives acts, like “ I promise to be at home before nine o’clock”. There are four kinds of acts belong to this category, such as : promising, threatening, intending, vowing to do or o refrain from doing something. 4. Expressive Based on Searle 1979, expressive are those kinds of illocutionary acts that showing what he speaker feel. They express psychological state and can be statement of pleasure, pain, likes, dislikes, joy or sorrow. They can be caused by something the speaker does or hearer does, but they are about the speaker’s experience. In using expressive, the speaker makes words fit the word of feeling. There are six kinds of acts belong to this category, such as : thanking, apologizing, congratulating, greetings, wishing, attitudes 5. Declaration It is the defining characteristic of this class that the successful performance of one of its members brings about the correspondence between the propositional content and reality, successful performance guarantees that the propositional content corresponds to the world: if I successfully perform the act of appointing you chairman, then you are chairman; if I successfully perform the act of nominating you as candidate, then you are a candidate; if I successfully perform the act of declaring a state of war, then war is on; if I successfully perform the act of marrying you, then you are married. Declarations bring about some alternation in the status or condition of the referred-to object or objects solely in virtue of the fact that the declaration has been successfully performed as seen in “I hereby pronounce you man and wife”. This feature of declarations distinguishes them from the other categories. There are six kinds of acts belong to this category, such as : blessing, firing, baptizing, bidding, passing sentence, excommunicating.

2.3.3 Context of Situation

Grudy 2000 stated that in the case of implicature, context helps to determine what is conveyed implicitly but not explicitly stated by the speaker. It means that the meaning of utterance depends on the context, which carries it. In addition, context makes the hearers to attend to how senders’ and receiver’ needs, goals, and want are personalized not just to the conventional meanings of prior text but also to particular socially and culturally defined communicative situations Brown and Yule, 1983. According to Halliday 1989:12, there are three features of context of situation that will be used in supporting the analysis of the problem about the function of illocutionary act, such as : field, tenor and mode. 1. Field of Discourse Field of the discourse refers to what is happening, to the nature of the social action that is taking place; what is it that the participants are engaged in, in which the language figures as some essential component. 2. Tenor of Discourse Tenor of discourse refers to who is taking part, to the nature of the participants, their statuses and roles; what kinds of role relationship obtain among the participants, including permanent and temporary relationships of one kind or another, both the types of speech role that they are taking on in the dialogue and the whole cluster of socially significant relationships in which they are involved. 3. Mode of Discourse Mode of discourse refers to what part the language is playing, what it is that the participants are expecting the language to do for them in that situation; the symbolic organization of the text, the status that it has, and its function in the context including the channel and also the rhetorical mode, what is being achieved by the text in terms of such categories as persuasive, expository, didactic and the like.