Background of The Study

the act of making an utterance in which the speakers are performing a certain kind of acts, such as : giving, asking, questioning, promising, offering, etc. Austin 1962 also classified speech act into 3 levels : i locutionary act or the act of saying something, ii illocutionary act or an act the speakers intend to do something by producing an utterance, and iii perlocutionary act or the act done by the hearers affected by what the speakers have said. Below is the example of the three types of speech acts : John : “Darling, do you want to go out to the show tonight ?” Laura : “I’m feeling ill.” John : “That’s ok. You stay there and I’ll make soup.” The locutionary act in the conversation is what she actually said – “I’m feeling ill”. At the same time, by saying that, Laura was telling John that she does not want to go out and considered as an illocutionary act as it is what a person does Laura, in particular in saying something else. Beyond communicating the state of her health and the answer to John’s question, Laura accomplished one more thing through saying I’m feeling ill. She got John to make her some soup, and it is an example of perlocutionary act in which is focused on the response others have to a speech act. Schiffrin 1994 also proposed that speech acts basically concern with what people do with language with the function of it. Illocutionary act is considered to be the core of speech acts. It is closely related with the speakers’ intention. It is the act of making a statement, offer, promise, etc. This act can be broken down into 5 categories according to Searle 1979 namely assertive, directive, commissive, declarative, and expressive. Looking at the explanation about speech act and illocutionary act, it is found very interesting to explore by looking at the complexity meaning conveyed. Therefore, conducting a research that elaborates about this is exciting in which the focus is not only about illocutionary acts, but also to the influence of the context of situation to the meaning. This study analyzed dialogues in Steel’s novel, The Cottage, with purpose to investigate the types of illocutionary acts used in the novel published in 2002. Many kinds of speech acts are found in the novel, but this study more focuses on two kinds of illocutionary acts, they are commissive and expressive illocutionary acts. Besides, this study was also purposed to find out how the context of situation supports the intended meaning. It was also considered necessary to point out the response of the hearer after the illocutionary acts were uttered to know how successful the acts were.

1.2. Problems of The Study

Problems in this study could be formulated as follows : 1. What types of commissive and expressive illocutionary acts are used in the novel? 2. What are the intended meanings of each type of commissive and expressive illocutionary acts used in the novel The Cottage, and how the context of situation supported the meaning of each illocutionary acts?

1.3 Objectives of The Study

1. To identify the types of commissive and expressive illocutionary acts used in The Cottage. 2. To analyze the intended meanings of each type of commissive and expressive illocutionary acts used in the novel The Cottage, and investigate how the context of situation support the meaning of each illocutionary acts.

1.4. Scope of Discussion

This research focused on the identification of the types and intended meanings of commissive and expressive illocutionary acts which are found in the novel The Cottage. Besides, the analysis of how the context of situation in the study was also going to be explained further in relation on how it supports the intended meaning conveyed within the illocutionary acts. 1.5 Research Methods 1.5.1 Data Source The data as taken from The Cottage by Danielle Steel published in 2002. The story is about Cooper Winslow, a star of the silver screen for decades, who is in for a major surprise. He is broken. And with no major roles coming his way, Coop is faced with the heartbreaking prospect of selling his beloved home of forty years, or at least renting out the gatehouse and part of the main house. A huge blow to Coop, whose debonair attitude allows him to escape reality much of the time. His new tenants, Mark Friedman and Jimmy OConnor, are busy coping with problems of their own. Marks wife of sixteen years just walked out, and