2.3 Uji Normalitas
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Unstandardized Residual
N 95
Normal Parametersa,b
Mean ,0000000
Std. Deviation ,07389933
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute ,092
Positive ,092
Negative -,051
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z ,897
Asymp. Sig. 2-tailed ,397
a Test distribution is Normal. b Calculated from data.
3. Hasil Penelitian Uji Hipotesis
3.1 Uji Koefisien Determinasi Adj R
2
Hasil Uji Koefisien Determinasi
Model R
R Square Adjusted
R Square Std. Error
of the Estimate
Durbin- Watson
1 ,498a
,248 ,197
,0763771 1,307
a Predictors: Constant, LEV, KI, RMC, UP, KK, RA b Dependent Variable: ERM
3.2 Uji Nilai F
ANOVA
b
Model Sum of
Squares df
Mean Square
F Sig.
1 Regression
,170 6
,028 4,848
,000a Residual
,513 88
,006 Total
,683 94
a Predictors: Constant, LEV, KK, RMC, UP, KI, RA b Dependent Variable: ERM
3.3 Uji Nilai t
Hasil Regresi Linier Berganda
Model Unstandardized
Coefficients Standardized
Coefficients t
Sig. B
Std. Error Beta
1 Constant 1,2485
0,1400 8,9184
0,000 KI
-0,2175 0,0824
-0,2639 -2,6375 0,010
RA -0,0379
0,0194 -0,2098 -1,9521
0,054 RMC
-0,0062 0,0306
-0,0215 -0,2039 0.839
KK -0,1855
0,0463 -0,4014 -4,0051
0,000 UP
-0,0055 0,0035
-0,1475 -1,5488 0,125
LEV -0,0890
0,0390 -0,2126 -2,2801
0,025 a Dependent Variable: ERM
FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMENGARUHI PENGUNGKAPAN ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT ERM
STUDI EMPIRIS PADA PERUSAHAAN PERBANKAN YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA PADA TAHUN 2013-2015
NUR ASRIANI
Email : nurasriani02gmail.com
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH YOGYAKARTA ABSTRACT
This study aims to analyze the influence of the independent commissioners, auditor reputation, existence of risk management committee, concentrated
ownership, firm size and leverage toward enterprise risk management ERM disclosure. The populations of this research are all banking companies listed in
the Indonesia Stock Exchange as long as 2013-2015. The sampling selection technique used method was purposive sampling. During observation of years
there are 33 companies qualified as samples. Multiple regression analysis was employed to analyses data.
The results showed that independent commissioner, concentrated ownership and leverage has negative effects on ERM disclosure. Auditor reputation,
existence of risk management committee and firm size does not effects on ERM disclosure.
Keywords: independent commissioners, auditor reputation, existence of risk
management committee, concentrated ownership, firm size, leverage, enterprise
risk management ERM disclosure.
Kategori