Student Teacher ST 4 Feedback of 5 Selected Teaching Skills Implemented by Student Teachers
                                                                                digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id
feedback  were  concerned  on  blackboard,  charts,  model,  picture,  and others,  draw  and  maintain  students  attention,  demonstration,  apply
teaching  aids  that  are  meaningful  and  purposeful,  encouragement  and clear understanding, and gives overall picture of explanation introductory
statement The total of feedback that had been appropriately implemented by ST
5  was  two  feedback.  While  there  were  only  one  feedback  that  she  had implemented  but  less  suitable.  Then,  there  were  three  feedback  that  had
not  been  implemented  yet  by  her.  The  chart  below  will  give  clearer understanding  on  the  percentage  gained  by  ST  5  dealing  with  feedback
implementation:
Chart 4.22
The Percentage of Feedback Implementation by ST 5 As  presented  in  chart  above,  there  were  33  feedback  that  had  been
used  by  ST  5  for  improving  her  second  cycle  of  teaching  practice.
33
17 50
The Percentage of Feedback Implementation by ST 5
1. Feedback that has been implemented
appropriately
2. Feedback that has been implemented but less
suitable
3. Feedback that has not been implemented yet
digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id
However,  the  feedback  that  she  had  not  used  yet  were  more  than  the feedback  she  had  appropriately  implemented,  that  was  50.  While  there
was only 17 feedback  that ST 5 was still less successful to  implement. The  detail  information  about  each  feedback  that  had  been  implemented,
had not been implemented yet, and had been implemented but less proper, will be described below:
1 Feedback that had been Implemented Appropriately
Aspect LF
on 1
st
teaching cycle
FI by ST at 2
nd
Teaching Cycle
Skill of
using teaching aids:
a. apply
teaching aids
that are
meaningful and
purposeful ST 5: apply media in
order  not  to  take much  time  of  your
students  with  only writing
long sentences
on the
whiteboard. ST  5:  she  had  tried  to
use media
that potentially  made  her
not  to  take  much students’  time.  In  this
case,  she  did  not  use whiteboard  again  to
write  long  sentences. She  had  attempted  to
apply  aids  that  could invite
students to
stand  up,  to  model  a role,  and  to  work  in
group.
2 Feedback that had been Implemented but less suitable
In this case, ST 5 had attempted not to do the same thing as what she  had  done  in  the  first  teaching  cycle.  She  had  tried  to  implement
digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id
lecturer’s  feedback  by  not  talking  with  herself  when  explaining  the material  to  students.  However,  she  did  not  explain  anything  in  the
second cycle of teaching practice eventhough she had tried not to talk with herself anymore.
Aspect LF
on 1
st
teaching cycle
FI by ST at 2
nd
Teaching Cycle
Skill of explaining: a.
Draw and
maintain  students attention
ST 5: teacher tended to  talk  with  herself.
That’s  why  students did  not  really  pay
attention to her.
ST  5:  she  had  tried  to avoid  to  talk  with
herself.  She  had  tried
to  maintain  students’ attention  although  in
second  cycle  she  did not explain anything.
3 Feedback that had not been Implemented yet
In case of feedback that  had not  been implemented  yet,  ST 5 truly did not use yet the feedback given by the lecturer in the first cycle of
teaching practice. Here is the detail of feedback that had not been use by ST 5.
Aspect LF
on 1
st
teaching cycle
FI by ST at 2
nd
Teaching Cycle
Skill of
probing question:
a. Encouragement
and clear
understanding
ST  5:  the  question that  teacher  gave  to
students  were  not explicit
ST  5:  the  questions given  by  ST  5  still
were  not  quite  clear. She seemed hesitate to
ask
questions to
students. Therefore,
sometimes students
said, “pardon
digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id  digilib.uinsby.ac.id
Ma’am?”  when  ST  5 asked question.
                