Skill of Introducing Lesson
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
situations. While in the general awareness and link between previous and new knowledge, 15, 4 or 2 of 13 student teacher were obtained
lecturer’s feedback discussing about these two details. The complete description about the data gained is presented below:
a Subject
As stated above that there were 3 of 13 student teachers who obtained lecturer’s feedback discussing about this detail. Those
three student teachers were ST
1
2, ST 4, and ST 11. They received the same feedback talking about the material that should fit with
students’ intelligence or with their grade level. The lecturer suggested them not to make the material too low and very easy.
b General Awareness
2 of 13 student teachers who gained feedback on general awareness were ST 1 and ST 11. Both of them attained feedback
from the lecturer that suggested them not to only say “today we
will learn about …..” or “do you know about introduction?” when introducing the lesson to the students since they will not listen it.
In other word, students will ignore what teacher tried to say.
c Devices and Techniques of Exploring
As stated above that there were 9 of 13 student teachers who received feedback concerning on this detail component. Those
1
Student teacher
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
nine student teachers were ST 1, ST 2, ST 4, ST 8, ST 9, ST 10, ST 11, ST 12, and ST 13.
The feedback gained by ST 1 and ST 13 suggested them to use game for introducing the lesson. Whereas, ST 2 obtained feedback
that recommended her to use warming up or pre-listening activity that can lead or can introduce students with the vocabulary that
they will listen to. Different with ST 2, ST 4 gained feedback from the lecturer that asked her not to repeat the material that she was
taught. The lecturer suggested her to try eliciting them by using high questions rather than repeating the material. While positive
feedback about the way in introducing the lesson to the students until they can recognize what they would learn at that time was
achieved by ST 8. Furthermore, feedback dealing with the use of appropriate
staging when introducing lesson was acquired by ST 9, ST 10 and ST 12. The lecturer suggested ST 9 to firstly introduce verb 1,
kinds of verb 1, and others before asking students to make sentences, whereas ST 10 gained positive feedback dealing with
the use of staging when she was practice teaching. However, ST 12 received feedback talking about how she can use different staging
which has different level of difficulty that she should use when introducing the lesson.
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
In addition, ST 11 obtained feedback that suggested her to try introducing the lesson without saying it directly. The lecturer
asked her to think the activities that can engage all students in the process of introducing the lesson as well.
d Link between Previous and New Knowledge
In the link between previous and new knowledge, the feedback directed to two student teachers, ST 2 and ST 11, discussed about
how they can link the background knowledge that has been had by students with the new knowledge that student teacher would teach.
In this case, lecturer commented on how ST 2 can direct students until they can produce by themselves about what they are going to
learn at that day. While on ST 11, lecturer asked her to assume that students have had enough background knowledge when they come
to the class. Thus, ST 11 should not think that students have not known yet anything.
e Creating Situations
In this last detail existing in maximum utilization of students’
previous knowledge, there were 3 of 13 student teachers. They were ST 2, ST 4, and ST 9. The Same feedback was gained by the
three of them. ST 2 and ST 9 were asked to use context on the material that they would teach in order they can present specific
situation for students. Whereas, ST 4 was requested to use the
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
situation that had been set up by her when she was teaching since at that time, she did not use it well although she had asked students
to move their chair and to form U shape as the seating arrangement.
2 Using Appropriate Devices
In this component, there are three details that were included into lecturer’s feedback. Those three details are questioning, audio-visual
aids, and demonstration. As the previous component, this component has also different percentage of student teacher gaining the feedback
concerning on those three details.
Chart 4.4 The Percentage of Each Detail on Using Appropriate
Devices As seen in chart 4.4, there were 30, 8 or 4 of 13 student teachers
that were obtained feedback dealing with questioning. Furthermore,
30.8 23.1
15.4
Using Appropriate Devices
1. Questioning 2. audio-visual aids
3. Demonstration
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
there were 23, 1 or 3 of 13 student teachers who gained lecturer’s
feedback discussing about audio-visual aids, and only 15, 4 or 2 of 13 student teachers who received feedback about demonstration. The
complete analysis is explained below:
a Questioning
As stated above that there were 4 of 13 student teachers attaining feedback concerning on questioning. Those four students
were ST 1, ST 2, ST 4, and ST 7. Both ST 1 and ST 7 gained positive feedback regarding their way in giving question. The
lecturer assumed that ST 7 succeeded to guide students to know the material that they were going to learn. However for ST 1, the
lecturer suggested her to use low question for knowing the background knowledge of students.
Conversely, ST 4 were asked by the lecturer to use high question
based on students’ level in order they are familiar with the use of critical thinking when leading students into the material that
will be taught. The lecturer also recommended her to do grading for questioning.
In line with ST 4, ST 2 gained feedback from the lecturer asking her to increase the level of the question based on students’
intelligence level.
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
b Audio-Visual Aids
Student teachers who obtained feedback dealing with audio- visual aids were ST 2 and ST 7. The feedback gained by ST 2
suggested her not to use instrument background sound when introducing the lesson. She may use that instrument when students
do their task. Whereas the feedback obtained by ST 7 tended to be positive. The lecturer assumed that the aids which was used by her
could lead students into the reading activities and made students knew the vocabulary relating to the topic that teacher would teach
without teaching it first.
c Demonstration
As known that there were also 2 of 13 student teachers who received feedback dealing with this detail. Those two student
teachers were ST 1 and ST 5. Both of them gained the same feedback informing them that they had not introduced yet the
vocabulary that they would teach. They should not directly ask students to do the task containing several new vocabulary that
teacher had not introduced it before.
3 Maintenance of Continuity
In this component, there is only one detail that was covered into lecturer’s feedback, that is sequence of ideas, and only one student
teacher who received it, who is ST 6. The feedback received by ST 6
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
told her that she had discussed the different thing that did not have any relation to the material that she was explained before and also stop
discussing the main material that she had introduced in the lead in process.
Chart 4.5 The Percentage of Student Teacher Receiving Feedback on
Maintenance of Continuity
4 Relevancy of Verbal or Non-verbal Behavior
In the component of relevancy of verbal or non-verbal behavior, there were two details enclosed into lecturer’s feedback. Those are
testing previous knowledge and establishing rapport. Furthermore, on each detail, there was only one student teacher who received feedback
about it.
8 92
Maintenance of continuity
1. ST who received feedback on sequence of ideas
2. ST who did not receive feedback about it
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
Chart 4.6 The Percentage of Each Detail on Relevancy of Verbal or
Non-verbal Behavior The detail explanation on those two detail are described below:
a Testing Previous Knowledge
Student teacher who gained feedback on this detail was ST 2. She was asked to test
how far students’ background knowledge by using lead in.
b Establishing Rapport
In establishing rapport, ST 4 who was the only student teacher who received feedback about it, was asked to move around to build
good rapport with students when introducing the lesson. She was suggested to see students’ work and find the difficulties faced by
them in introducing the material.
7.7 7.7
Relevancy of Verbal or Non-Verbal Behavior
1. ST who received feedback on testing
previous knowledge
2. ST who received feedback on
establishing rapport
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
5 Arouse Interest
Chart 4.7 The Percentage of Student Teacher Receiving Feedback on
Arouse Interest As seen in chart 4.7, there was only one detail that was covered
into this component and also one student teacher who gained this detail. The detail was introducing a surprise. In this case, ST 2 who
received feedback dealing with that detail, was asked to try give something new for the students that can increase their enthusiasm to
learn when introducing the material that will be taught. b.
Skill of Probing Question
In this skill, there was only prompting technique as the only component covered on
lecturer’s feedback. There were 30, 8 or 4 of 13 student teachers gaining feedback dealing with this component. Then, in
the prompting technique, there were two details of this component that were involved by the lecturer as her feedback. Those two details were
provide series of questions helping students to develop correct response
1 99
Arouse interest
1. ST who received feedback on Introducing a surprise
2. ST who did not receive feedback about it
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
and encouragement and clear understanding. There were 23, 1 or 3 of 13 student teachers who gained feedback about provide series of questions
helping students to develop correct response, and there were 7, 7 student teachers who accepted feedback dealing with encouragement and clear
understanding.
Chart 4.8 The Percentage of Student Teacher Receiving Feedback on
Prompting Technique To make the reader easier in understanding the components and the
details in the skill of probing question covered in lecturer’s feedback, the researcher uses the following table. The complete analysis concerning
with each detail covered is described after the following table.