Seeing Islam and the Muslim world in 20
Muslim world, it is hardly even imposibly called as violence or terror Chomsky, 2002: par. 3-24.
Nonetheless, not all of the Islamists work through violence, the idea of reestablishing the Caliphate is also carried on non-violent work, but the lines
between mainstream Islamic idea such as the Caliphate and its non-violent work, has been blured with terrorism Realiteten, 2006: par. 1. Other Islamists and
Islamic organizations precisely take the non violence ways. Some of them, like the Jordanian Muslim Brothers and the Yemeni Al-Islah Party, attempt to
advocate the establishment of Islamic state via democratic process. Various Sunni groups opt to preach the customary practice of the Prophet Mohammed, espouse
the propagation of his teaching trough missionary activities in many Muslim countries in order to establish Islamic state through the establishment of an
Islamic society by personal and social transformation from below. Some of them focus on running schools, hospitals, clinics, or providing a wide range of social
services. It is obvious that the movements conducting by the Islamists and various kinds of Islamic organizations are actually diverse, but this distinction is often
ignored by the contemporary Orientalism discourse. They are all lumped together and labeled as fundamentalist or extremist who commit in violence and terrorism.
Moreover, the one sided global stadard of civilization also contributes to the developing of Eurocentric images of the Muslim world and its inhabitants.
The West often refers to Islam and the Muslims as the antichrist, heretic, sensualist, barbarian and the greedy despot; or having intolerant, old fashioned,
uncivilized, retrograde, inferior, and unusual characters Quinn, 2008: 137, 159,
163-5. Kalin says that after the September 11 tragedy which is followed by War on Terrorism agenda, the image of Islam and the Muslims have been sharpenned
in to a new pattern of hate as some American and European analysts went so far as to claim that violence is part of the Arabs and Muslim cultures and that the only
language they understand is violence. Considering the aim of the political Islamic movement, that is the
establishment of Islamic state, it may fear the Western mind that the realization of the idea may result in the resurgence of the unchallenged rival of the West, or
even the more frightening—the resurgence of another Islamic domination under the Caliphate. This idea apprehensively may not give any chance of the Arabs
political obedience to the Western interests. Kalin 2011: par. 1 4 asserts that a new era is being ushered in by the Arab people, and this newly emerging Arab
world will not ensure political submission to the West. Said 1978: 73-4 also regards on this matter, that for a time, only the Arab and Islamic Orient that can
be the unresolved challenge on the political, military, intellectual, and even economic levels. Inside the Europeans’ mind, they even cannot forget how Islam
outstripped and outshone Rome. For much of its history, the problematic European attitude towards Islam is hard to be avoided. Hence, for the Muslims
who carry Islamic ideas—especially the Islamic state or Caliphate idea—as a solution to save their country—are labeled by the West as the extremists which
apprehensively regarded as the regenerator of imaginary barbaric Islamic state which will aggressively combat the non-Muslims to convert to Islam or die.
Terrorism issue which becomes a more sensational topic along with the September 11 tragedy fusses the people that the threats, the terrorists, are right
behind the Islamic jihad, represented by the name of Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, who are claimed to be the ones who want to destroy the West, the infidels,
and America. This finally lead to the existence of dominance image of Islam in the West in recent times, violence and reciprocity, which are described as
prevalence riots, bombings, targetted killings, and warfare Quinn, 2008: 3, 165- 6. This matter of course also still has a relationship with the idea of reestablishing
the Caliphate since the aim of Al Qaeda is also to recreate the Caliphate and unite Muslims in the world National Counter Terrorism Centre, 2013: par. 1.
Whereas, the idea of Islamic state or Caliphate is actually has become a forbidden idea since the abolishment of the Ottoman Turks, the last Caliphate. Hence, it is
not a surprize if the West has had an opposition agenda toward the idea of Caliphate or Islamic state.
The opposition toward the idea of Caliphate is also reflected in one of Tony Blair’s speeches, “terrorism will not be defeated until its ideas, the poison
that warps the minds of its adherents, are confronted, head-on, in their essence, at their core” via Realiteten, 2006: par. 1. Moreover, Blair also says that the
ideology brought by the terrorists has a relation to the idea of reestablishing the Caliphate, which is regarded as the ‘evil ideology’. He also attempts to make a
distinction between the past Caliphate that was “leading the world in discovery, art and culture”, and the vision Muslims have for the future Caliphate that he
refers to as “pre-feudal”. In fact, opposition to the Caliphate actually has been at
the core of Britain’s Foreign Policy for centuries. It is also clearly emphasized by Lord Curzon, the British Foreign Secretary in 1924, who says in one of his
speeches as follows: “We must put an end to anything which brings about any
Islamic unity between the sons of the Muslims. As we have already succeeded in finishing off the Caliphate, so we must ensure that there
will never arise again unity for the Muslims, whether it be intellectual or cultural unity” via Mowla, 2008: 516.
This polemical background then becomes a part of the involute negative image of Islam and the Muslim world today.