Related Studies REVIEW OF LITERATURE

CHAPTER II REVIEW OF LITERATURE

2.1 Related Studies

To supporting the idea of choosing the topic, some previous studies are needed such as: Batubara 2009 in her thesisentitled An Error analysis of auxiliary Verbs Made by the 20062007 Ninth Grade Students of Madrasah Tsanawiyah Al-Ulum Medan, concludes that the most error made by students is the using of do 36,26, the using of be 32,90, and an error in using have 30,84. Pujiasi 2010 in her thesis entitled The Errors of Unity and Coherence In Writing English Paragraph Made by The Sixth Semester Students of D-3 English Study of USU : A Case Study, concludes that the percentage made by the students in a sequence : 3.25 in using the topic and controlling idea into a good subject and verb, 9.74 in limiting the controlling idea into a good specific idea, 11.04 in using the irrelevant sentences, 2.59 in making the repetition of key nouns, 4.55 in making the constituent of pronouns, 44.15 in applicating the true transition signals, and 24,68 in applicating the chronological orders. Napitupulu 2010, The Errors of Using Adverb by the Eleventh Years Students of SMA Negri 7 Medan, concludes that the errors made by the students are omission of adverb of time 5.63, Omission of adverb of place 5.63, Omission of adverb of manner 9.85, Misformation of adverb of time 7.04, Misformation od adverb of place 4.22, Misformation of adverb of manner 14.08, Misorderingof adverb of time 11.26, Misorderingof adverb of place 5.63, Misorderingof adverb manner 7,04, Overgeneralization of adverb of time 9.85, Overgeneralization of adverb of place 4.22, Overgeneralization of adverb of manner 15.49. IdawatiSitumorang 2011, An Error Analysis in Using Tenses Made by the Third Year Students of SMK 7 Medan, concludes that the kinds of error made by the students in using tenses are Misformation 78.87 Misformation of Simple Present Tense 6.16, Misformation of Present Continues Tense 8.27, Misformation of Simple Past Tense 18.31, Misformation of Pas continues Tense 25.88 and Misformation of Simple Future 20.25, Omission 13.73 Omission of Simple past Tense 2.11, Omission of Present Continues Tense 7.92, Omission of Simple Past Tense 0, omission of Past Continues Tense 3.52, and Omission of Simple Future Tense 0, Overgeneralization of Simple Past Tense 3.52, Overgeneralization of Past Continues Tense 0, and Overgeneralization of Simple Future Tense and Incomplete Rule of Application 3.87 Incomplete application of Rules of Simple Past Tense 2.29, Incomplete Application of Rules of Past Continues Tense 0, and Incomplete Application of Rules of Simple Future Tense 0. Rukiah 2012An Error Analysis In Using Passive Voice Made By Eleventh Year Students Of MAN 1 Panyabungan, concludes that the percentage of correct and incorrect answers of passive voice by students of 32 questions. Finds the most error made by students in simple future tense 27.75, simple past tense 26.59, and the last is simple present tense 20.23 Djayanti 2012 An Error Analysis of the Use of Simple Sentence Made by the Ninth Grade Students of SMP Negri 2 PancurBatu,concludes thatMisformation error is the highest error which is 48.52, involves: preposition, conjunction, noun, adverb, adjective, gerund, modals, be, article, pronoun, and determiner. Omission error with 25.15, involves: -ing article, verb, preposition, reflexive pronoun, pronoun, determiner, 3 rd person singular, possessive maker, and be. Misordering with 19.95, involves: misordering of verb phrase and misordering of noun phrase. And the lowest error is addition error with 11,39, involves: addition of determiner, plural maker ses, -ing, modal, be possessive maker, verb, preposition, pronoun, adjective, article, noun, and 3 rd person singular verb maker. Sri Wahyuni2014, Teaching Writing Design Based On the Students’ Difficulties in Writing Narrative Texts, concludes that From 35 Second Grade Students of Junior High School, there were 9 students did not face difficulty in writing narrative text and 26 students faced difficulties as below: a. In using Past tense occurred 152 cases or 80, 85 from all cases. b. In using conjunction occurred 26 cases or 13,83 from all cases. c. In using adjective occurred 10 cases or 5,32 from all cases.

2.2 Definition of Writing

Dokumen yang terkait

An Error Analysis in Using Direct and Indirect Speech Made Twelfth Year Students of Hospitality Accomodation Program, SMK Raksana 2 Medan

13 80 139

AN ERROR ANALYSIS OF USING INFLECTIONAL MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURE IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT BY THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS.

0 2 25

AN ERROR ANALYSIS IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT MADE BY THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK MUHAMMADIYAH 1 SURAKARTA IN An Error Analysis In Writing Descriptive Text Made By The Tenth Grade Students Of SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta In 2016/2017 Academic Year.

0 6 11

AN ERROR ANALYSIS IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT MADE BY THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK An Error Analysis In Writing Descriptive Text Made By The Tenth Grade Students Of SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta In 2016/2017 Academic Year.

0 3 13

An Error Analysis In Writing Narrative Text Made By The Eleventh Grade Students Of SMK Teladan Sumatera Utara 1 Helvetia

0 0 14

An Error Analysis In Writing Narrative Text Made By The Eleventh Grade Students Of SMK Teladan Sumatera Utara 1 Helvetia

0 0 2

An Error Analysis In Writing Narrative Text Made By The Eleventh Grade Students Of SMK Teladan Sumatera Utara 1 Helvetia

0 0 4

An Error Analysis In Writing Narrative Text Made By The Eleventh Grade Students Of SMK Teladan Sumatera Utara 1 Helvetia

0 0 20

An Error Analysis In Writing Narrative Text Made By The Eleventh Grade Students Of SMK Teladan Sumatera Utara 1 Helvetia

0 0 2

An Error Analysis In Writing Narrative Text Made By The Eleventh Grade Students Of SMK Teladan Sumatera Utara 1 Helvetia

0 0 6