Warungkondang Sub-District Characteristics of Research Locations
that had no information about percentage of output produced. To address this problem, this study used average percentage of the other rice millers. Percentage
of rice was 62.27 percent of grain used. Percentage of broken rice was zero because rice miller of this type did not do separation to obtained broken rice.
Percentage of rice bran and chaff were 16.06 and 21.67 percent respectively. Distribution of rice miller separated by percentage of rice produced can be seen
on Figure 13.
Figure 12 Distribution of Rice Miller Separated by Percentage of Rice Produced Figure 13 showed that percentage of rice produced were concentrated in the
60.00-65.00 percent range. 40 units in this range were makloon type. Referring to Appendix 1, the most percentage was 62.27 percent which was percentage of this
type. 18 rice millers were makloon type that did not had information about percentage of output produced.
The rest were spread in the other range. The smallest range was 50.00-55.00 percent, mostly filled by five units of rent type rice miller. The highest range was
60.00-70.00 percent, all filled by eight units of rent type rice miller. Non-makloon and combination types were concentrated in the 55.00-60.00 percent range.
Distribution of rice miller separated by percentage of broken rice produced was illustrated on Figure 14.
1 4
40
8 2
9 3
5 12
10 8
25 53
8
50.00-55.00 55.00-60.00
60.00-65.00 65.00-70.00
F re
qu ency
un it
Percentage of Rice Produced Range
Makloon Non-makloon
Combination Total
Figure 13 Distribution of Rice Miller Separated by Percentage of Rice Bran
Produced
Figure 14 showed that 77 units of all types of rice miller were concentrated in the 0.00-2.50 percent range for broken rice produced. All of rent type rice
miller was 53 units in this range. Referring to Appendix 1, the rice millers had zero percent for broken rice. This type rice miller that found in the field did not
produce broken rice. This was due to rice miller just follow ordered by consumer. Consumers tended to hire service to produce rice without separated from broken
rice. Mostly, consumers of this type rice miller were farmers who directly
consume or store rice as inventory consumed during growing season. While the other consumers were middlemen, they did not separate rice from broken rice.
The rice directly sold to market or the larger rice miller for reprocessing. In this range, there were nine units rice miller of non-makloon type, in
which five units rice miller had percentage by two percent for broken rice. While combination type rice miller was 15 units, in which six units had percentage by
one percent. The next range, 2.50-5.00 percent range, was filled by 11 units. There were
eight units combination type, which in four units had percentage about five percent. The rest were non-makloon type, which in two units had percentage about
five percent. 53
9 3
2 15
8 4
77
11 6
0.00-2.50 2.50-5.00
5.00-7.50 7.50-10.00
F re
q u
en cy
un it
Percentage of Broken Rice Produced Range
Makloon Non-makloon
Combination Total
Related to the percentage of rice produced, greater percentage of rice then obtained smaller percentage of broken rice. This was due to broken rice was a
byproduct resulted from the separation of rice with broken rice. Next byproduct of rice milling was rice bran. Distribution of rice miller separated by percentage of
rice bran produced was illustrated on Figure 15.
Figure 14 Distribution of Rice Miller Separated by Percentage of Rice Bran Produced
Mostly, rent type rice millers were concentrated in the 15.00-20.00 percent range. There were 32 units rice miller. 18 units of rice miller which were have no
information about percentage of output produced dominate this range. The rice millers had percentage by 16.06 percent. The rest were rent type rice millers that
had been knows the percentage. There were eight units combination type and three units non-makloon type. All rice millers had percentage about 20.00 percent.
Rice millers of rent type filled in the 10.00-15.00 percent range were 18 units. Seven units were non-makloon type rice miller. The rest were combination
type. The three types in this range had percentage by 15.00 percent. Total rice millers in the 5.00-10.00 percent range were 13 units. This
number was dominated by combination type about nine units. Six units had 3
18 32
1 7
3 2
1 9
9 8
1 13
34 43
2 2
F re
q u
en cy
un it
Percentage of Rice Bran Produced Range
Makloon Non-makloon
Combination Total