45
researcher’s consideration to decide the next steps. After doing the first pre test, the researcher conducted a treatment to the students. After considering some
points related to the pre test, the researcher decided to introduce the method he would give to the students slowly and carefully. He firstly introduced and gave an
explanation about they were going to do after the pre test and what was its relationship with the pre test they had done before.
The researcher used audiolingual method by drilling the students in practicing a dialogue and focusing on the pronunciation of expressions of
thanking, complimenting and congratulating. At first, the researcher started the dialogue line per line and he wanted the students to repeat after him. The
researcher then focused on the pronouncing of expression of thanking, complimenting and congratulating and repeated them for several times. The
students then repeated after the researcher. After some repetitions of the activity were done, the post test of the first cycle then would be conducted in the second
meeting.
4.1.1.1 Analysis of Test of Cycle 1
The test of cycle 1 was conducted in the second meeting. In this case, the test of cycle 1 would be considered as the pre test for the second cycle. This was
aimed to find the correlation between the previous and the next cycle. The activity done in the test of cycle 1 was the same one done in the first pre test. This was
done in order to see the improvement that had been achieved by the students after the treatment. The result of the test of cycle 1 can be seen in the table below
46
Table 6. Result of Test of Cycle 1 Level Score
x Students
n Nx Percentage Result
5 10
nx = 192 = 5.33
n 36 4 8 7 56
19.44 3 6 10 60 27.77
2 4 19 76 52.79 1
2 Total
Σ 36
192 100
There were some improvements of the result achieved by the students. There were seven students who achieved level 4, ten students achieved level 3 and
nineteen students were still at level 2. Seven students had improved their quality of pronunciation after the treatment. They had pronounced the same expressions
given in test of cycle 1 better than in pre test. Meanwhile, from the amount of 11 students who were at level 3 in the pre test, there were still 10 students at that
level. So there was an increasing. The amount of the students at level 2 was decreasing from 25 students in pre test became 19 students in test of cycle 1.
The result showed that the students began to understand the method of learning given. They slowly learnt the method of teaching pronunciation by
audiolingual method. But the researcher still found some weaknesses in the result. The students’ pronunciations were still influenced a lot by their dialect and
they still found difficulties to imitate the pronunciation correctly because of the limited time. It means that they had not improved a lot.
47
According to the result of t the test of cycle 1, the researcher decided to conduct the second cycle. As this the test of cycle 1 was considered as the pre test
for the second cycle, the researcher did not have to do another pre test. He only had to decide the activities that would be done in the treatment of the second
cycle.
4.1.2 Analysis of Second Cycle
