Data Collection Data analysis

lii

D. Steps of Conducting Action Research

1. Data Collection

The data of the research were collected using some techniques of quantitative and qualitative data collection which include: the scores of the written tests, interview, observation, diary, and document analysis. Audio visual recording and photographs were also taken during the implementation of the research to provide more accurate data. The data which were collected in this study consisted of the information gained in pre-research, the process, and the result of Action Research implementation. To know the level of the students’ learning motivation, the writer uses questionnaires. The results of questionnaires are changed into quantitative data by using Likert Scale. To know the students’ listening proficiency, he takes from the tests that are carried out before and after the cycles are implemented.

2. Data analysis

There are two kinds of data, quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data in numbers form are taken from the tests that are carried out before and after the implementation of cycles. Meanwhile, qualitative data, in the form of words are taken from the result of observation done by the teacher while the actions are being carried out. liii During the process of Action Research, he collected the following group of data: research diary, pre-research observation reports, field notes, record of research implementation, photographs of teaching learning process and research documents which consist of: lesson plan, lesson tasks, questionnaires result, and list of students’ pre-test and post-test results. The qualitative data are analyzed by using Constant Comparative Method as suggested by Strauss and Glasser in Moleong 2005: 288-289. They said that in general, the data analysis process includes data reduction, data classified, data synthesis, and ended by action hypothesis. They are as follows: 1. Data Reduction a Unit identification. First of all, it is identified the smallest unit which is found in the data. It must have closed relationship with the research problems. b Having got the unit, the next step is making codification. It means that we have to code every unit in order to be known where the data come from. 2. Categorization a Categorization Arrangement. It is aimed at choosing every unit which has the same characteristics. b Every category must be labeled. 3. Synthesis a To synthesize means that to look for relationship between one category to another. liv b The related one category to another must be given a label again. 4. Stating ‘Action Hypothesis’ . The quantitative data are analyzed by comparing the means of the pre-test and post-test to know the difference before and after the cycle.

CHAPTER IV THE RESULT OF THE STUDY

The aims of the research are to find out whether the use of Power Point improve students’ learning motivation. If it does, to what extent; and to identify whether the use of Power Point improve students’ listening proficiency. If it does to what extent. The findings are described in this chapter which is divided into two sections. The first is the process of the research and the second is the findings. Each section will be described in section A and section B, respectively.

A. The Process of the Research

The research was conducted in SMAN I Girimarto. In conducting the research, the writer was assisted by an observer, who is also an English teacher in SMAN I Girimarto. We are familiar with Action Research, and we have been working together in conducting Action Research for solving problems related to students’ learning motivation and listening proficiency. After discussing about his study she was interested in the study since she also wanted to improve her

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving the First Year Students Writing Achievement through Peer Editing Technique at SMAN I Tongas Probolinggo Iin the 2006/2007 Academic Year;

0 6 10

IMPROVING THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS’ WRITING ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH PEER EDITING TECHNIQUE AT SMAN I TONGAS PROBOLINGGO IN THE 2006/2007 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 14 8

Improving students' writing ability through clustering technique (A classroom action research in the second year of SMP al-hasra Bojongsari- Depok)

4 11 109

Improving Students' Ability in Using Conditional Sentence Type 2 Through Contextual Teaching and Learning

0 4 131

The relationship between students’ learning style and their achievement in listening skill (a correlational research at the first grade of the SMAN 01 Pamijahan Bogor)

0 16 86

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING PROFICIENCY THROUGH PAIRED STORYTELLING (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMK Bhinneka Karya in the Academic Year 2008 2009)

0 7 102

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ TOEIC SCORE THROUGH COOPERATIVE LEARNING (An Action Research at Grade Twelve of SMK Negeri 1 Wonogiri in Academic Year 2010 2011)

0 3 211

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY USING OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES (AN ACTION RESEARCH AT SIXTH YEAR OF SD NEGERI 2 SURU GEYER GROBOGAN IN 2009 / 2010 ACADEMIC YEAR).

1 7 7

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING: AN ACTION RESEARCH AT THE SIXTH YEAR OF SD NEGERI TRIYAGAN 2 SUKOHARJO IN 2007/2008 ACADEMIC YEAR.

0 0 10

ACTION RESEARCH ON IMPROVING STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION IN SPEAKING THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING LEARNING.

0 0 27