66 MAX The Data of Control Class

B. Data Analysis and Hypothesis Testing

1. Analysis of Pre-test and Post-test

a. Normality

A normality test is needed to find out whether the hypothesis of the research has been normally distributed or not; the data are homogeneous or heterogeneous. This test is scored by using SPSS Statistic 17. The normality test can be seen as follow: Table 4.3 Normality of Pre-test Using One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test CONTROL EXPERIMENT N 25 25 Normal Parameters a,,b Mean 58.64 55.60 Std. Deviation 10.839 12.359 Most Extreme Differences Absolute .136 .155 Positive .136 .155 Negative -.121 -.118 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .679 .774 Asymp. Sig. 2-tailed .745 .587 a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data. Table 4.4 Normality of Pre-test Using Liliefors Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. CONTROL .136 25 .200 .934 25 .107 EXPERIMENT .155 25 .125 .937 25 .123 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction . This is a lower bound of the true significance. The normality calculation above used One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test and Liliefors. From the table above, it is shown the absolute difference D of controlled class data is 0.136. It is lesser than D table with the closest Kolmogorov- Smirnov critical points of 25 = 0,264. Besides, from the Lilliefors test, it shows that the normality is significant. So, it can be concluded that the data is normal as what has been written down exactly below the table. Table 4.5 Normality of Post-test Using One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test CONTROL EXPERIMENT N 25 25 Normal Parameters a,,b Mean 66.00 68.40 Std. Deviation 11.180 9.323 Most Extreme Differences Absolute .144 .202 Positive .144 .202 Negative -.110 -.161 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .721 1.012 Asymp. Sig. 2-tailed .676 .258 a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data. Table 4.6 Normality of Post-test Using Liliefors Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. CONTROL .144 25 .191 .957 25 .355 EXPERIMENT .202 25 .010 .949 25 .241 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Dokumen yang terkait

The Effectiveness of Information-Gap Toward Students' Speaking Skill (A Quasi Experimental Research at the Second Grade Students of MTs Khazanah Kebajikan Pondok Cabe Ilir)

16 106 107

The Effectiveness Of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (Stad) Technique On Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Study At Second Grade Students Of Smp Islam Ruhama Ciputat)

1 8 168

The Effectiveness of Using Mind Mapping in the Teaching of Writing Essay

0 9 99

Grammatical Errors on Students' Writing of Recount Text (An Error Analysis at the Second Grade Students of SMP Dharma Karya UT Pamulang)

1 11 80

THE ABILITY OF READING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF MTs NURUL HUDA KALIWUNGU KUDUS IN ACADEMIC YEAR 20132014 TAUGHT BY USING TWO STAY TWO STRAY

0 0 18

THE READING COMPREHENSION OF REPORT TEXT OF THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 1 MAYONG JEPARA IN ACADEMIC YEAR 20132014 TAUGHT BY USING TWO STAY TWO STRAY

0 0 89

The Use of Two Stay Two Stray Technique in Learning Reading Comprehension of Recount Text at Second Grade Students of SMPN 1 Sungguminasa - Repositori UIN Alauddin Makassar

0 0 112

THE INFLUENCE OF USING TWO STAY TWO STRAY TECHNIQUE TOWARDS STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION IN NARRATIVE TEXT AT THE FIRST SEMESTER OF THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMP N 20 BANDAR LAMPUNG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2017/2018 - Raden Intan Repository

0 3 213

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TWO STAY TWO STRAY TECHNIQUE FOR TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION (An Experimental Research at the Second Grade of SMP Muhammadiyah Sumbang in Academic year 20122013)

0 0 10

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TWO STAY TWO STRAY TECHNIQUE FOR TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION (An Experimental Research at the Second Grade of SMP Muhammadiyah Sumbang in Academic year 2012/2013) - repository perpustakaan

0 0 17