INTRODUCTION SPEECH PRODUCTION ERRORS IN MICROTEACHING MADE BYENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS OF MUHAMMADIYAH Speech Production Errors In Microteaching Made By English Department Students Of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta In 2014/2015 Academic Year.

show of program metro TV face to face with Desi Anwar broadcasted in January to June 2012. This second research is conducted by Rakhmawati UMS: 2011 entitled “A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Speech Errors Made by Rachel Ray TV Show. The aims of this researcher are to give descriptions of speech error phenomena which occur in the Rachel Ray TV Show. This research is to find out the type of speech error and the sources of speech errors in this program. In this research, the researcher uses some theories related to the topic. The theories are speaking skill, speech production, speech error, and error analysis. Then, the researcher analyzes the data especially speech error by using Clark and Clark theory. There are many types of speech error such as silent pause, filled pause, repeats, correction, stutters, interjections, unretraced false start, retraced false start, and slip of tongue. Then, the researcher also uses the sources of error such as cognitive reason and psychological reason based on the Clark and Clark theory. The objectives of this research are 1 to describe the types of error 2 to describe the frequency of error 3 to describe the dominant error 4 to describe the sources of error made by English Department Students in Microteaching class.

B. Research Method

The type of this research is a descriptive qualitative method. The researcher uses descriptive qualitative method to describe the types of errors, the frequency of errors, the dominant error and the sources of errors occurring in microteaching class made by English Department Students of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. The object of the research is errors in speech production made by English Department Students of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta, especially in Microteaching class. The subjects in this research are the students of English Department. It is consist of 17 students in Microteaching class. The data of this research are utterances containing spoken errors taken from transcription of video Microteaching. In this research, the method of collecting the data is documentation. The researcher collects the data by using some procedures such as 1 Collecting the videos of Microteaching from lecture 2 Watching and listening the videos 3 Writing the transcription based on the videos 4 Identifying the data that include the utterances of errors 5 Selecting the data based on the types of errors. In analyzing data, the research uses descriptive qualitative technique, Sugiono 2009 in Miles and Huberman 1984: 91. The techniques are as follows 1 Data Reduction. It refers to the process of selecting, focusing, simplifying, abstracting and transforming data that appear in notes, transcripts, documents, etc. And it includes identification the data, selecting the data whether error or not error utterance 2 Data Display. Data displays are an organized way of compressing information and assembling it in ways that help to draw conclusions. Data display includes a Describing the data utterance containing errors based on the type of error using speech error and error analysis theory b Counting the number of each type of error c Selecting the dominant of the error based on the frequency of the errors data d Explanation the source of each utterance containing of error in the data 3 Conclusion Drawing and Verification. Conclusion drawing involves stepping back to consider what the analyzed data mean and to assess their implications for the questions at hand. Verification, integrally linked to conclusion drawing, entails revisiting the data as many times as necessary to cross-check or verifies these emergent conclusions. Conclusion drawing and verification includes make the conclusion from the research result to answer the problem statements in this research.