52
1 Presenting pit stop kinds of picture from Lecfenco. There were seven pictures which demonstrate or do something. The purpose
was to activate the students’ background knowledge and to learn new vocabularies.
2 Reading the procedure text silently 3 Discussing the content and the structures of Procedure
4 Answering questions written in a group The teacher was the facilitator who helped the students to apply their
strategy in Reading Comprehension like skimming, scanning, making inferences and summarizing. The activities were varied in term of co-operation, they were
groupingpairing and doing individual work. c. Post teaching After Reading Activity
There were two ways to assess the students namely multiple choice form and essay form. There are ten questions of multiple choices for the first meeting.
The activities gave a lot benefits as it involved all reading comprehension strategies: predicting, scanning, skimming, making inference and summarizing.
D. Data Collection Instrument
The Qualitative Data Instrument is Observation and Questionnaire. The observation in on- going learning activities is assessed by the Attitude Rubric. The questionnaire is Evaluation and
Reflection Sheet after the students joining the learning activities. While the Quantitative Data Instrument is the Result Assessment, they are questions and multiple choice questions assessed by
Scoring. In brief the data and collected data instrument can be seen in Table 3.6 below:
Table 3.5 Data, Data Collection and Data Collection Instrument
Data and Data Collection Data Collection Instrument
Students’ answer before reading activities Pre-Test Students’ answer after reading activities cycle 1
Students’ answers after reading activities cycle 2 Post Test
Scoring Scoring
Scoring
53 Observation in before reading activities and on-going
TL activities Attitude rubric
Questionnaire for evaluation and reflection Evaluation and reflection sheet
E. Data Collection
The data of the research consist of two types namely qualitative and quantitative data. The qualitative data were taken from the students’ responses when they work on questionnaire and the
observation. The qualitative data were collected through: 1.
Questionnaire. The questionnaire was used to obtain students’ responses of the teaching and learning process and learning media. The questionnaire consisted of five questions and three
options Yes, No, Do not know. The writer will give the questionnaire after the treatments in cycle 1 and cycle 2 end. It is on November 20th, 2015. The questionnaire itself contains the
questions about Lecfenco’s benefit and effects for the students. 2. Observation. It was done to obtain real data about the use of Lecfenco for teaching reading. The
observation is done before, during and after the treatment of the research. The collaborator helped the researcher to get observation data. It is done on November 4th, 2015 in the first
meeting and on November 7th, 2015 in the second meeting for cycle 1. Then it is on November 14th, 2015 in the first meeting and on November 18th, 2015 for cycle 2. Appendix 4
3. Documentary evidence. According to Hopkins 1975: 140-141, the documentary evidence can be memos, letters, position papers, examination papers, newspaper clipping etc. The
advantages of documentary evidence are that they can: 1 illuminate issues surrounding a curriculum or teaching method; 2 provide context, background and understanding; and 3
provide an easy way of obtaining other people’s perception. The writer get the documentary evidences from the examination papers of pre-test, the post-test in cycle 1 and the post-test in
cycle 2. It will be done on October 31, 2015 for pre-test, on November 11th, 2015 for the post- test in cycle 1 and on November 21st, 2015 for the post-test in cycle 2.
The qualitative data are the students’ reading comprehension scores. The qualitative data are taken from the pre-test and post-test that the researcher has been done. Before the pre-test is
carried out, a try out was needed to make sure that all the test items are valid and the test is reliable. To get the valid test, the writer used SPSS vers 17.
54 Before the items of pre-test were tested to the students of IXD, they were tried out to IXB.
The writer asked for the consultant to analyse by running program of SPSS 17. The all items were valid because the result of test was more 0.30. The internal reliability score was 0.8914 so the test
was reliable. The items for test in cycle 1 and cycle 2 were same but they were presented randomly. The result of internal validity and reliability was in appendix 6.
F. Data Analysis
