Private Third-Party Decision Making 1 Administrative or Executive Dispute Resolution Approach

third-partys integrity and judgment should be trusted by the dispute parties, so that the agreement process can be done Moore 27-28. 2 Arbitration Quite different from administrative or executive dispute resolution approach the arbitration process takes a fully impartial and neutral party to make the decision or just to provide the necessary information which can lead to the conflict resolution. This process is a private process which is not open to public Moore 29 -30.

3. Legal Authoritative Third-Party Decision Making 1 Judicial Approach

A judicial approach involves the intervention of a party that is seen as the institutionalized authority. In this approach, the resolution process is no longer in a private but more on a public area. In this approach, the parties who have conflicts usually hire lawyer to defend their behalf, the case is presented before a totally impartial and neutral third-party. The decision of the case is not merely considered by the dispute-parties concern, interest, and arguments but more on the broader societys standard and values. The result of this approach is usually a win-lose condition where one party is declared as the right one while the other one as the wrong. Moore 32-33 2 The Legislative Approach The legislative approach is another public means of solving a conflict by law. It is usually employed for larger disputes affecting broad population, but it may have significant utility for individuals. In this approach, the decision regarding the outcome is made by another win-lose process. It probably uses voting. The process of legislative approach to the problem solving might take a long time Moore 34 -35.

4. Extralegal Coerced Decision Making

This approach deals with using a stronger means of coercion to force an opponent into compliance or submission. There are two types of extralegal approaches. 1 Non-Violence Approach This approach is applied when there are people or a group of people who do not behave as they should. This approach forces them to behave in a desired manner. Usually this approach can be effectively used when the disputes-parties must rely on each other for their living. For example, a husband should provide his wife with a sufficient amount of support money, attention, care, etc. This approach involves social norms disobedience and it does not use any kind of physical coercion Moore 36-37. 2 The Violence Approach The last approach is violence or physical coercion. In this approach, the party who possesses more power will be able to force the result of the resolution. It often happens that the means of forcing the decision is a physical coercion Moore 37- 38.