Interview KINDS OF SPEAKING

should be carefully planned so that both participants know where the discussion is heading.

4.3 Interview

Compared to the kind of speaking above, interview is slightly different. Brown 1983:136 states that “interview needs a person as the object to be asked for by can a person or more than one person as the subject of the interview”. The term of interviewer is used here as the person who asked different questions to the object of the interview, meanwhile the person who is called interviewee as the object to be asked for. According to Koch 2004: 162 “A carefully planned interview can be an excellent way to communicate information. In the discussion interview, the participants should plan the questions in advance so both will know where the discussion is going. A good interviewer can elicit a wealth of information from a well-informed interviewee”. In the interview, there is only one topic related to the question to be asked for the object or interviewer. This usually happens in a certain purpose, for examples: vacancy for a job. In here the interviewer has the rights to ask different questions without any denial from the object or interviewer. The object has to answer all the questions that the interviewer asked for. The very formal situation sometimes is not good for interviewer, because he has no rights to defend or back to ask for anything to the interviewer. This kind of speaking is not a good kind of speaking because one of the participants is lack of his right during the speaking process. Universitas Sumatera Utara 5. SPEAKING PROCESS Processes are an important type of subject. Much of our knowledge is a matter of learning a process that according to Byrns 1997: 267. Lesikar 1978:336 states that “a simple model of speaking process”, as follows: Sender news Receiver This model shows three elements of essential speaking. If one of the elements is missing, the speaking can not run well. For example, someone can send a message, but whenever there is no one who receiver or hears the message, the speaking can not run. The sender plays an important role to send hisher news to the receiver. But the sender should be able to send the news successfully in order the receiver may get the news or information correctly. Although the model is simple, the speaking process is complex. The example of the complexity is “telephone”, in which the sender sends a message, but possibly the receiver receives or hears the message which is not meant by the sender. Lesikar 1978:336 also suggest that there are some important elements too in order to obtain a good speaking. He suggested that the elements could be source, encoding the message, transmitting the message, the receiver, the decoding the message and feedback. If one of these elements is missing a good speaking can not be obtained successfully. For more details of this explanation can be explained as follows: Universitas Sumatera Utara

5.1 Source