CONCLUSIONS IMPLICATIONS CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

5. The implementation of giving handouts helps the students to keep in mind the materials and help their vocabulary and also the pronunciation. It implies that students’ vocabulary and pronunciation will be improved. 6. The implementation of using classroom English can make students be familiar with English. It implies that by used to listening to and speaking English daily, the students speaking skills will be improved.

C. SUGGESTIONS

Some suggestions are given to the participants who are closely related to this study. The suggestions are made based on the conclusions and implications of this study. They are presented as follows: 1. For the English teachers In reference to the result of this research, group work is effective to improve students’ speaking skills. Therefore, the English teachers are suggested to apply group work in the English teaching and learning process in order to improve the students’ speaking skills. Moreover, the English teachers should enrich their creativity in teaching English speaking by applying many interesting and communicati ve activities to attract the students’ interest and involvement. 2. For students The implementation of group work is useful to improve students’ interactions and their speaking skills. However, the students are suggested to implement the principles of group work in their daily learning in order to improve the better result of learning. 3. For other researchers This research only focuses on implementing group work in the speaking teaching and learning process. This research concerns on improving the students’ speaking skills by maximizing students’ speaking performance during the teaching and learning activities. Therefore, the other researchers who are interested in the same field are recommended to continue and improve this action research in order to find out o ther efforts to improve students’ speaking skills. 76 REFERENCES Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan BSNP. 2006. Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Brown H. D. 2001. Teaching by Principles 2 nd Edition: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy . New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. _________. 2000. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. 2nd edition. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc . Burns, A. 1999. Collaborative Actions Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ________. 2010. Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching . New York: Routledge. Feez, S. and Joyce, H. 2002. Text-Based Syllabus Design. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research Macquarie University. Harmer, J. 2001. How to Teach English. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited. ________. 2002. The Practice of English Language Teaching 3 rd Edition. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited. Hornby, A.S. 1995. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kayi, H. 2006. Teaching Speaking: Activities to Promote Speaking in a Second Language. Nevada: University of Nevada 77 Killen, R. 2009. Effective Teaching Strategies: Learning from Research and Practices 5 th Edition. Australia: Cengage Learning Luoma, S. 2009. Assessing Speaking. UK: Cambridge University Press. Richards, J.C. 2008. Teaching Listening and Speaking : from Theory to Practice. New York : Cambridge University Press Richards , J. C and Renandya, W. 2002. Methodology in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press. Soraya, B. 2010 . Enhancing Students’ Oral Proficiency through Cooperative Group Work. Constantine: University of Constantine Thornburry, S. 2005. How to Teach Speaking. UK: Pearson Longman. Ur, P. 2009. A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. UK : Cambridge University Press Wallace, T. et al. 2004. Teaching Speaking, Listening and Writing. France: Typhoon.