Children: Whoa
6 a.
Children: Oh, come on. Its fun.
Gru: No Stop No one is ever
getting out there Ever
b. Lucy: This is fun
Gru : Yes. Surprisingly, it
was. Expressive
Praising 00:23:52,973 --
00:23:54,816 00:23:56,852 --
00:24:00,072 00:56:10,826 --
00:56:12,078 00:56:12,160 --
00:56:15,004
7 a.
El Macho: Oh, oh Im sorry. Pollito is usually
very friendly.
Gru: Well, we really should be
going. Girls, come on.
b. El Macho: Lucia, I
apologize. The same thing happened the other day
with Gru, and...
Lucia: Oh, well, speaking of Gru, um, have you seen
him? I really need to talk to him.
Expressive Apoligizing
00:48:09,804 -- 00:48:13,684
00:48:18,896 -- 00:48:21,615
01:13:17,560 -- 01:13:19,403
01:13:28,988 -- 01:13:33,585
B. Data Analysis
From the data above, the writer analyzes the script of the movie Despicable Me 1: SuperBad, SuperDad and the movie Despicable Me 2: When The World
Needed a Hero, They Called a Villian which were directed by Pierre Coffin and Chris Renaud. The writer uses the theory of Speech act introduced by J.L. Austin
and John Searle which consists of locutionary acts, illocutionary acts, and perlocutionary acts, but in this research the writer focused on perlocutionary acts.
It will be analyzed through the locutionary acts, illocutionary acts, and perlocutionary acts. These are the analyses:
Datum 1 1
Addresser addressee: Gru and Children 2
Setting: In Gru’s home 3
Relationship: Gru as Buyer and Children as Sellers Children
: Cookies for sale Offering
Gru : Go away. Im not home.
Children : Yes you are I Heard You
Gru : No. you did not. This is a recording.
The utterance Go away. Im not home means he does not want to buy the cookies because he buys a muffin from bread shop before. So, he orders the
children to go away from his home.
1 Addresser addressee: Vector and Children
2 Setting: In Vector’s home
3 Relationship: Vector as Buyer and Children as Sellers
Children : Were selling cookies so, you know, we can have a better future Offering
Vector : Ooh Wait, wait Do you have coco-nutties?
Children : Yeah. From the fact above, we know that the answer of hearer is not like what is
expected by the speaker because the first person has a muffin before. However, the second person really likes cookies. So, those reasons are background why
those illocutionary acts do not fulfill the expected of perlocutionary acts. From the context, the same illocutionary acts is offering. Based on the
comparison of the conversation above, we can conclude that the perlocutionary act is not like what is expected by the speaker in the different condition. Gru
already have a cake while Vector has not it because it will be different perlocutionary act.
Datum 2 1
Addresser addressee: Dr. Nevario and Gru 2
Setting: in Front of Vector’s home 3
Relationship: Dr. Nevario as friend and Gru as Friend
Gru : Dr Nefario Im going to need a dozen tiny robots disguised as cookies
Dr. Nevario : What?
Gru : Cookie robots Asserting
Dr. Nevario : Who is this? Gru
: Oh, Forget it. Gru gives explaining that he wants cookis robots. However, Dr. Nevario
answers Who is this?. The answer of Dr. Nevario tells to Gru that he does not listen clearly. So, the communication between them does not work well.
1 Addresser addressee: Dr. Nevario and Gru
2 Setting: Gru’s home
3 Relationship: Dr. Nevario as friend and Gru as Friend
Dr. Nevario : A dozen boogie robots Boogie Look at this. Watch me
Gru : Cookie robots I said cookie robots. Asserting
Dr. Nevario : Okay. Im on it. Gru is disappointed with Dr. Nevario that he wants cookies robots not
buggies robot. So he says “Cookie robots I said cookie robots” to give understanding to Dr. Nevario. Based on the fact, Dr. Nevario has problem in
listening. So, he does not listen well. However, when meeting directly, he will understand the purpose. So, those reasons are background why those illocutionary
acts do not fulfill the expected of perlocutionary acts. From the context, the same illocutionary act is asserting Based on the
comparison of the conversation above, we can conclude that the perlocutionary act is not like what is expected by the speaker in the different condition. The first
conversation occurs over the phone so it can happen any time of hearing to communicate while the second conversation happened to meet in person and the
speaker can explain it well. Therefore there will be different perlocutionary act.
Datum 3 1
Addresser addressee: Children and Gru 2
Setting: Gru’s home 3
Relationship: Children as his children and Gru as their father
Gru : Wow, wow
Edith : It was your cousin’s idea
Gru : What? Okay, bedtime. Ordering
Children : Aw
